Crustacea: Copepoda - Cerambycoidea.com
Crustacea: Copepoda - Cerambycoidea.com
Crustacea: Copepoda - Cerambycoidea.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. Introduction<br />
This checklist of the invertebrates that develop in timber and the products of its decay has<br />
been <strong>com</strong>piled for a number of reasons. It is provided as a working tool for field workers, for<br />
nature conservationists and for ecologists:<br />
�� to facilitate the recording of particular species on particular sites, to focus field<br />
workers on the significant habitat features;<br />
�� to draw the attention of nature conservationists to the enormous variety of niches<br />
exploited in wooded habitats and to emphasis the importance of wood decay<br />
succession;<br />
�� to stimulate ecological research of the fauna.<br />
It is a working document, not intended to be <strong>com</strong>plete or set in stone, a starting point to focus<br />
minds onto its strengths and weaknesses, and to stimulate ideas on where to go from here.<br />
Ideally it should be on a web-site for ease of up-dating and dissemination, and this will be<br />
one of the next stages. It is very much a statement of the information I have collated to date<br />
and so another purpose is to stimulate people to make available information that may<br />
contribute to the next edition. There will be lots here for people to criticise - if they so wish -<br />
but it is hoped that people will prefer a more constructive approach and help to up-grade this<br />
Provisional list into something more useful.<br />
The <strong>com</strong>pilation has made it possible to identify how many of our species are known to be<br />
dependant on the process of wood decay – the answer is close 1800 for Britain and over 600<br />
for Ireland (see Summary Table). The next stage will be to break this fauna down into its<br />
constituent <strong>com</strong>munities, a process that will inform and develop our understanding of the<br />
relative importance of particular sites.<br />
The checklist is very much provisional at this stage. It is provided in a spirit of co-operation<br />
and partnership, with the express hope that other specialists will help me to build on it rather<br />
than pull it apart with criticism. It is certainly provided as an Aunt Sally, to be knocked<br />
around and hammered into something better. It aims to be the first stage in building<br />
something more useful, as a baseline for future developments in our understanding and<br />
appreciation of this rich and important habitat.<br />
Whether or not a species occurs on a particular site which appears to provide suitable habitat<br />
depends on two things: firstly the biogeography of the species and secondly on the<br />
management history of the area. A detailed examination of the fauna is also essential if we<br />
are to make sensible assessments of which species are characteristic of long-established sites,<br />
ie ancient woodlands and ancient wood pastures, and hence which may be used as indicators<br />
of ecological continuity and conservation value. While some species individually may be<br />
good indicators of ecological continuity, and are clearly part of the urwaldtiere or relict old<br />
forest fauna of these islands, it is perhaps most advisable to use them collectively - the more<br />
of the identified indicators known from a particular site the more ecological continuity can be<br />
inferred. This latter approach has been advocated with deadwood Coleoptera and Syrphidae<br />
(e.g. Alexander, 1995).<br />
A large proportion of this fauna shows strong association with areas of relict old growth – old<br />
forest, medieval parks and chases, wooded <strong>com</strong>mons, old wood pastures and similar<br />
9