Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
88 <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Hype</strong><br />
The traditional small scale farms are store houses of diversity managed by men and women<br />
sharing the responsibilities. Farmers (men and women) play a conscious and determinant<br />
role in the generation and maintenance of diversity through dynamic interaction with the<br />
biotic and abiotic factors within the agro-ecosystem. In order to understand and enhance the<br />
traditional practices of farmers, it is necessary to acknowledge and learn more about the<br />
complex and diverse nature of the indigenous resource exploitation system. Conserving<br />
biodiversity also needs conservation of these traditional farming systems that have nurtured<br />
the presently existing diversity (Tsegaye, 1997, p. 225).<br />
These approaches require ongoing active engagement at all levels to introduce,<br />
maintain and grow their effectiveness.<br />
[P]romoting and supporting participatory technologies have limited impact when no attention<br />
is paid to participatory policy development and implementation (de Jager, 2005, p. 57).<br />
Furthermore, unless reward structures also reflect the value of ecosystem services, there<br />
will be little incentive for the private sector to invest in sustainable agricultural methods<br />
(Tilman et al., 2002, p. 676).<br />
In summary, biodiversity and agrobiodiversity are best maintained, even promoted,<br />
in agroecosystems composed of small-scale farming wherein multiple crops are grown<br />
using many different pest control and soil restoration practices. While some industrialscale<br />
technologies can have lower negative impact than other conventional methods, these<br />
technologies appear to only slow and not reverse the ecological impacts of agriculture and<br />
any benefits may be short-term. Social equity and national capacity-building goals are<br />
best achieved by policies that involve the farmer, often women, in ongoing innovation<br />
and secure the benefits of that innovation for the farmer and local community. In this<br />
regard, there has been no obvious benefit of genetic engineering technologies which are<br />
dominated by a small number of mega-corporations. Agroecological methods may not<br />
only better suit the social structures and agroecosystems of developing countries, they<br />
may in time out-produce the present industrial conventional methods of developed<br />
countries.<br />
Target: increased yield and disease resistance<br />
GMOs have not been designed to directly increase yield, although yield gains might<br />
be derived indirectly from more effective pest management in some cropping systems<br />
(see Chapter Five). On the whole, any such yield and financial return gains have been<br />
sporadic and highly crop- and year-dependent, with researchers concluding (e.g., for Africa)<br />
that there “is still not enough evidence to generalize about the returns to GM crop<br />
improvement research” (Eicher et al., 2006, p. 523).<br />
This is the good news: biotechnologies not based on transgenics remain technically<br />
capable of meeting our food needs (UNEP/UNCTAD, 2008). However, this will not be<br />
achieved by simply eliminating modern biotechnology. We cannot rely on agroecological