23.01.2015 Views

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Hype</strong><br />

The traditional small scale farms are store houses of diversity managed by men and women<br />

sharing the responsibilities. Farmers (men and women) play a conscious and determinant<br />

role in the generation and maintenance of diversity through dynamic interaction with the<br />

biotic and abiotic factors within the agro-ecosystem. In order to understand and enhance the<br />

traditional practices of farmers, it is necessary to acknowledge and learn more about the<br />

complex and diverse nature of the indigenous resource exploitation system. Conserving<br />

biodiversity also needs conservation of these traditional farming systems that have nurtured<br />

the presently existing diversity (Tsegaye, 1997, p. 225).<br />

These approaches require ongoing active engagement at all levels to introduce,<br />

maintain and grow their effectiveness.<br />

[P]romoting and supporting participatory technologies have limited impact when no attention<br />

is paid to participatory policy development and implementation (de Jager, 2005, p. 57).<br />

Furthermore, unless reward structures also reflect the value of ecosystem services, there<br />

will be little incentive for the private sector to invest in sustainable agricultural methods<br />

(Tilman et al., 2002, p. 676).<br />

In summary, biodiversity and agrobiodiversity are best maintained, even promoted,<br />

in agroecosystems composed of small-scale farming wherein multiple crops are grown<br />

using many different pest control and soil restoration practices. While some industrialscale<br />

technologies can have lower negative impact than other conventional methods, these<br />

technologies appear to only slow and not reverse the ecological impacts of agriculture and<br />

any benefits may be short-term. Social equity and national capacity-building goals are<br />

best achieved by policies that involve the farmer, often women, in ongoing innovation<br />

and secure the benefits of that innovation for the farmer and local community. In this<br />

regard, there has been no obvious benefit of genetic engineering technologies which are<br />

dominated by a small number of mega-corporations. Agroecological methods may not<br />

only better suit the social structures and agroecosystems of developing countries, they<br />

may in time out-produce the present industrial conventional methods of developed<br />

countries.<br />

Target: increased yield and disease resistance<br />

GMOs have not been designed to directly increase yield, although yield gains might<br />

be derived indirectly from more effective pest management in some cropping systems<br />

(see Chapter Five). On the whole, any such yield and financial return gains have been<br />

sporadic and highly crop- and year-dependent, with researchers concluding (e.g., for Africa)<br />

that there “is still not enough evidence to generalize about the returns to GM crop<br />

improvement research” (Eicher et al., 2006, p. 523).<br />

This is the good news: biotechnologies not based on transgenics remain technically<br />

capable of meeting our food needs (UNEP/UNCTAD, 2008). However, this will not be<br />

achieved by simply eliminating modern biotechnology. We cannot rely on agroecological

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!