23.01.2015 Views

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94 <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Hype</strong><br />

GM fish production also has an uncertain future (Maclean, 2003). Although fish are<br />

“particularly amenable to genetic manipulation” (van Eenennaam and Olin, 2006, p. 126),<br />

the fact that they also are prone “to escape confinement and potentially invade native<br />

ecosystems elevates the ecological concerns associated with their genetic modification”<br />

(van Eenennaam and Olin, 2006, p. 126). Meanwhile, the industry again has failed to<br />

close critical research gaps to allow GM fish to be properly evaluated.<br />

However, for most transgenic fish, insufficient publicly accessible data are available to resolve<br />

the complex issues that are necessary both for risk assessments and to develop consumer<br />

and commercial confidence. For transgenic fish technology to move forward, empirical risk<br />

assessment research needs to be undertaken and presented in parallel with strain development,<br />

enabling this maturing technology to have the essential information available to support<br />

regulatory and social requirements (Devlin et al., 2006, p. 89).<br />

Table 7.1: Food security among the developing GM “mega-countries” 1<br />

Mega-Country 2 Proportion in GM Food Supply<br />

Cultivation (%)<br />

Argentina 65 Decreasing since 1995-1997<br />

Brazil 23<br />

Paraguay 66 Decreasing since 1995-1997<br />

Uruguay 35<br />

1<br />

Based on hectares in GM cultivation according to James (2007) and total arable land plus permanent<br />

crops according to FAOSTAT in 2003.<br />

2<br />

Shading indicates growth in undernourished population (FAOSTAT).<br />

So while progress “in transgenic technologies has allowed the generation of<br />

genetically modified large animals for applications in agriculture and biomedicine” (Kues<br />

and Niemann, 2004, p. 286),<br />

[i]n contrast to the undoubted efficacy of conventional genetic selection, which delivers<br />

sustained improvements year-on-year, transgenic strategies for genetic improvement have<br />

simply not delivered. Explicitly put, no transgenic livestock have been generated that were<br />

deemed worthy of incorporation into livestock breeding regimes (Clark and Whitelaw, 2003,<br />

p. 827).<br />

Both the <strong>World</strong> Bank and advocates of transgenic approaches have recognized the<br />

solid track record of livestock improvement through conventional approaches.<br />

The cross-breeding of dairy cows with exotic breeds has improved the livelihoods of<br />

smallholder farmers in high-potential areas in the tropics. About 100 million cattle and pigs<br />

are bred annually in the developing world using artificial insemination. And thanks largely<br />

to artificial insemination, about 1.8 million small-scale farmers in the highlands of East

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!