Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
94 <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Hype</strong><br />
GM fish production also has an uncertain future (Maclean, 2003). Although fish are<br />
“particularly amenable to genetic manipulation” (van Eenennaam and Olin, 2006, p. 126),<br />
the fact that they also are prone “to escape confinement and potentially invade native<br />
ecosystems elevates the ecological concerns associated with their genetic modification”<br />
(van Eenennaam and Olin, 2006, p. 126). Meanwhile, the industry again has failed to<br />
close critical research gaps to allow GM fish to be properly evaluated.<br />
However, for most transgenic fish, insufficient publicly accessible data are available to resolve<br />
the complex issues that are necessary both for risk assessments and to develop consumer<br />
and commercial confidence. For transgenic fish technology to move forward, empirical risk<br />
assessment research needs to be undertaken and presented in parallel with strain development,<br />
enabling this maturing technology to have the essential information available to support<br />
regulatory and social requirements (Devlin et al., 2006, p. 89).<br />
Table 7.1: Food security among the developing GM “mega-countries” 1<br />
Mega-Country 2 Proportion in GM Food Supply<br />
Cultivation (%)<br />
Argentina 65 Decreasing since 1995-1997<br />
Brazil 23<br />
Paraguay 66 Decreasing since 1995-1997<br />
Uruguay 35<br />
1<br />
Based on hectares in GM cultivation according to James (2007) and total arable land plus permanent<br />
crops according to FAOSTAT in 2003.<br />
2<br />
Shading indicates growth in undernourished population (FAOSTAT).<br />
So while progress “in transgenic technologies has allowed the generation of<br />
genetically modified large animals for applications in agriculture and biomedicine” (Kues<br />
and Niemann, 2004, p. 286),<br />
[i]n contrast to the undoubted efficacy of conventional genetic selection, which delivers<br />
sustained improvements year-on-year, transgenic strategies for genetic improvement have<br />
simply not delivered. Explicitly put, no transgenic livestock have been generated that were<br />
deemed worthy of incorporation into livestock breeding regimes (Clark and Whitelaw, 2003,<br />
p. 827).<br />
Both the <strong>World</strong> Bank and advocates of transgenic approaches have recognized the<br />
solid track record of livestock improvement through conventional approaches.<br />
The cross-breeding of dairy cows with exotic breeds has improved the livelihoods of<br />
smallholder farmers in high-potential areas in the tropics. About 100 million cattle and pigs<br />
are bred annually in the developing world using artificial insemination. And thanks largely<br />
to artificial insemination, about 1.8 million small-scale farmers in the highlands of East