Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Précis for Policy-Makers<br />
1<br />
Chapter One<br />
Précis for Policy-Makers<br />
Key messages<br />
1. The modern biotechnologies coming from developed countries favour large-scale<br />
farming of a small number of mega-crops. This range of crops does not fit the type<br />
and purpose of farms of subsistence and poor farmers.<br />
2. Relatively new changes in patent and patent-like plant variety protection (PVP)<br />
intellectual property instruments influence the type of technologies dominating in<br />
developed countries, particularly in promoting the development of genetically modified/engineered<br />
(GM/GE) crops.<br />
3. These same instruments create liabilities for farmers, by potentially extending<br />
proprietary ownership to non-GM crops contaminated through transgene flow.<br />
4. Intellectual property and some biosafety regulations create liabilities for GM farmers<br />
and developers of GM crops, by also potentially extending proprietary ownership<br />
to inadvertently mixed GM crops containing transgenes from different developers<br />
and contaminated through transgene flow, and by linking damage to non-GM farmers<br />
or consumers to transgene flow.<br />
5. The scale of and subsidies for farming in developed countries, along with efforts<br />
to harmonize intellectual property frameworks and protect intellectual property coming<br />
from developed countries, combine to inhibit the development of local agriculture<br />
markets in developing countries and have dampened research by and for local farmers.<br />
6. The potential agronomic advantages of many GM crops are not realized by subsistence<br />
farmers who grow a large diversity of crops in close proximity, and GM<br />
crops make industrialized farmers and consumers vulnerable to the effects of<br />
monocropping, environmental damage from intensification, and loss of agro- and<br />
bio-diversity.<br />
7. Policy options include a new emphasis on public funding of agriculture innovation<br />
for the poor and subsistence farmer. This may include a balanced portfolio of<br />
investment in improving agroecological methods applied at scale, farmer participatory<br />
and extension projects, and modern biotechnology research with a commensurate<br />
reduction in the emphasis on commercial control of products.