Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56 <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Hype</strong><br />
Comments such as Spielman’s above were criticized during the Assessment’s peerreview<br />
process for understating the degree of environmental diversity that has been tested,<br />
on the grounds that tests span the US and it is an environmentally diverse country. This<br />
argument is fraught with difficulties, however, because it exposes a lack of easily compared<br />
and comprehensive studies that are publicly available. For example:<br />
There is an almost complete lack of peer-reviewed literature on the Cry1Ab [transgene] expression<br />
of Mon810 [corn] at different plant growth stages, tissue types and seasons, despite<br />
of the world-wide use of Mon810 varieties. Most of the published data on Cry1Ab expression<br />
levels derived from a very few studies and are limited to a few tissue types, such as root, stalk<br />
and anther (Nguyen and Jehle, 2007, p. 82).<br />
This topic will be explored in more detail below. In any case, general yield benefit<br />
claims even in US cropping systems are not consistent with the data.<br />
Yields of [IR] cotton appear largely unchanged at most locations, and those of maize are<br />
mostly unchanged (in 12 out of 18 regions), except where there has been high corn-borer<br />
pressure. Where pressure was high, yields were 5-30% greater for GM maize. In Missouri,<br />
however, no significant differences in yield under various corn-borer pressures across the<br />
state were found and at the University of Purdue it has been concluded that farmers may not<br />
benefit by adopting Bt [IR] technologies under average pest infestation levels, given that<br />
economically-significant pest attack occurs only one [sic] in 4-8 years in most locations in<br />
the USA (Pretty, 2001, pp. 255-256).<br />
Researchers are now aware that GM crops in very uniform environments still display<br />
variation in the expression of transgenes. To illustrate, a recent study found significant<br />
differences in transgene expression levels between identical commercial varieties when<br />
analyzed by growth phase and tissue and grown in two different locations just within<br />
Germany (Nguyen and Jehle, 2007).<br />
The monitoring of Cry1Ab expression showed that the Cry1Ab contents varied strongly<br />
between different plant individuals (p. 82)…our analyses are the first large-scale expression<br />
monitoring of Cry1Ab under European field conditions and provide a comprehensive data set<br />
of the temporal distribution of Cry1Ab in transgenic maize Mon810. Cry1Ab expression was<br />
lowest in pollen, very low in the stalks, low in roots, but highest in the leaves. Although our<br />
studies corroborate the tendencies of reported Cry1Ab contents of Mon810, a considerable<br />
variation in the expression levels of Cry1Ab was observed. The observed variation exceeds<br />
variation levels reported previously and may be due to the large number of analysed samples<br />
and different growing years (Nguyen and Jehle, 2007, p. 86).<br />
Generally speaking, how variable the expression of any gene might be when the<br />
plant is grown in different environments is not well surveyed. This is unfortunate because<br />
the variation in the expression of these transgenes has benefit/harm-specific implications.<br />
For insecticide-producing GM crops, individual variation could undermine long-term re-