23.01.2015 Views

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134 <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Hype</strong><br />

[Generation-to-generation transfer:] [T]he RNAi effect is remarkably long lived. Potent<br />

interference is routinely observed not only in the injected animal but also in all of the injected<br />

animal’s progeny. Thus, interference can be inherited…For many genes, interference can<br />

persist for at least one full generation after the one receiving the injection, and for certain<br />

genes, interference can be observed to transmit in the germ line apparently indefinitely<br />

(Tabara et al., 1998).<br />

However, ERMA explicitly rejected RNA of this type as genetic material:<br />

siRNA, antisense RNA, shRNA, micro-RNAs and dsRNA molecules that have been produced<br />

and purified are not genetic material (ERMA, 2006, p. 58).<br />

The HSNO Act is silent on what constitutes genetic material, but ERMA equates<br />

genetic material with “genetic element” (ERMA, 2006). Genetic element is defined by<br />

the Act as “any genes, nucleic acids, or other molecules from the organism that can,<br />

without human intervention, replicate in a biological system and transfer a character or<br />

trait to another organism or to subsequent generations of the organism” (Part 1 s2). By<br />

virtue of RNA being able to form replication pathways without human intervention, it is<br />

genetic material and/or a genetic element. Therefore, it can be directly deduced that<br />

organisms exposed to in vitro RNA or that have any ancestral history deriving from RNA<br />

manipulated in vitro or synthesized from DNA that has any ancestral history of in vitro<br />

manipulation, have been genetically modified.<br />

It appears that ERMA is correct in thinking that genetic elements are at least a subset,<br />

if not the full set, of all that can be considered genetic material. However, because dsRNA<br />

is clearly a genetic element as per the definition of the Act, it is not clear how ERMA<br />

excluded it as a molecule that creates GMOs.<br />

Replication of dsRNA and inheritance of gene silencing by various biochemical pathways<br />

The ability to replicate dsRNA molecules is nearly ubiquitous.<br />

Pioneering observations on PTGS/RNAi were reported in plants, but later on RNAi-related<br />

events were described in almost all eukaryotic organisms, including protozoa, flies,<br />

nematodes, insects, parasites, and mouse and human cell lines (Agrawal et al., 2003, p.<br />

657).<br />

This is also the case for bacteria (Gottesman, 2005; Tchurikov et al., 2000). Thus, in<br />

theory, many organisms exposed to dsRNA will be capable of replicating and “expressing”<br />

a gene silencing trait, just as they would be able to replicate DNA and potentially express<br />

DNA-mediated traits, depending on certain conditions being met. For example, expression<br />

of a gene composed of DNA requires compatibility between various important DNA<br />

sequences and proteins that serve as transcription factors. Similarly, gene silencing will<br />

require compatibility between existing genes and the small dsRNA molecule that first<br />

enters the cell (Buratowksi and Moazed, 2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!