Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
134 <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Hype</strong><br />
[Generation-to-generation transfer:] [T]he RNAi effect is remarkably long lived. Potent<br />
interference is routinely observed not only in the injected animal but also in all of the injected<br />
animal’s progeny. Thus, interference can be inherited…For many genes, interference can<br />
persist for at least one full generation after the one receiving the injection, and for certain<br />
genes, interference can be observed to transmit in the germ line apparently indefinitely<br />
(Tabara et al., 1998).<br />
However, ERMA explicitly rejected RNA of this type as genetic material:<br />
siRNA, antisense RNA, shRNA, micro-RNAs and dsRNA molecules that have been produced<br />
and purified are not genetic material (ERMA, 2006, p. 58).<br />
The HSNO Act is silent on what constitutes genetic material, but ERMA equates<br />
genetic material with “genetic element” (ERMA, 2006). Genetic element is defined by<br />
the Act as “any genes, nucleic acids, or other molecules from the organism that can,<br />
without human intervention, replicate in a biological system and transfer a character or<br />
trait to another organism or to subsequent generations of the organism” (Part 1 s2). By<br />
virtue of RNA being able to form replication pathways without human intervention, it is<br />
genetic material and/or a genetic element. Therefore, it can be directly deduced that<br />
organisms exposed to in vitro RNA or that have any ancestral history deriving from RNA<br />
manipulated in vitro or synthesized from DNA that has any ancestral history of in vitro<br />
manipulation, have been genetically modified.<br />
It appears that ERMA is correct in thinking that genetic elements are at least a subset,<br />
if not the full set, of all that can be considered genetic material. However, because dsRNA<br />
is clearly a genetic element as per the definition of the Act, it is not clear how ERMA<br />
excluded it as a molecule that creates GMOs.<br />
Replication of dsRNA and inheritance of gene silencing by various biochemical pathways<br />
The ability to replicate dsRNA molecules is nearly ubiquitous.<br />
Pioneering observations on PTGS/RNAi were reported in plants, but later on RNAi-related<br />
events were described in almost all eukaryotic organisms, including protozoa, flies,<br />
nematodes, insects, parasites, and mouse and human cell lines (Agrawal et al., 2003, p.<br />
657).<br />
This is also the case for bacteria (Gottesman, 2005; Tchurikov et al., 2000). Thus, in<br />
theory, many organisms exposed to dsRNA will be capable of replicating and “expressing”<br />
a gene silencing trait, just as they would be able to replicate DNA and potentially express<br />
DNA-mediated traits, depending on certain conditions being met. For example, expression<br />
of a gene composed of DNA requires compatibility between various important DNA<br />
sequences and proteins that serve as transcription factors. Similarly, gene silencing will<br />
require compatibility between existing genes and the small dsRNA molecule that first<br />
enters the cell (Buratowksi and Moazed, 2005).