Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
Hope Not Hype - Third World Network
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
68 <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Hype</strong><br />
Bacillus producing δ-endotoxins encoded by cry and cyt genes are considered to be a<br />
pathogen of insects rather than mammals (Appendix Three; NPTN, 2000; Schnepf et al.,<br />
1998). The cry genes are named after the parasporal crystal proteins which form inclusions<br />
in B. thuringiensis spores.<br />
All pesticides have environmental costs. Insecticidal crops are toxic to both target<br />
and non-target organisms. The full range of non-target effects of Bt crops is still to be<br />
determined (Schmidt et al., 2008). As with research on yield, the amount of research on the<br />
effects of insecticidal crops has been limited by the number of years since their<br />
commercialization and the number and quality of studies.<br />
[I]n the case of GM crops, scientific analyses have also been deficient. In particular, many<br />
experiments used to test the environmental safety of GM crops were poorly replicated, were<br />
of short duration, and/or assessed only a few of the possible response variables. Much could<br />
be learned and perhaps some debates settled if there were credible quantitative analyses of<br />
the numerous experiments that have contrasted the ecological impact of GM crops with those<br />
of control treatments involving non-GM varieties (Marvier et al., 2007, p. 1475).<br />
Important organisms in freshwater, where the residues of Bt crops are expected to<br />
accumulate, are among the non-target organisms that have been found to be affected.<br />
Laboratory feeding trials showed that consumption of Bt corn byproducts reduced growth<br />
and increased mortality of nontarget stream insects. Stream insects are important prey for<br />
aquatic and riparian predators, and widespread planting of Bt crops has unexpected ecosystemscale<br />
consequences (Rosi-Marshall et al., 2007, p. 16204).<br />
We conclude that the tested variety of Bt-maize and its UM [unmodified] counterpart do not<br />
have the same quality as food sources for this widely used model organism. The combination<br />
of a reduced fitness performance combined with earlier onset of reproduction of D. magna<br />
fed Bt-maize indicates a toxic effect rather than a lower nutritional value of the GM-maize<br />
(Bøhn et al., 2008, p. 584).<br />
Human health effects of Bt crops are more uncertain. However, there are very few<br />
studies on human consumption of GM crop plants and no studies on effects of inhalation;<br />
even animal studies are rare (Domingo, 2007; Pryme and Lembcke, 2003). Worryingly,<br />
some research as recent as late 2008 is warning of potential adverse effects (Appendix<br />
Three; Finamore et al., 2008; Seralini et al., 2007; Velimirov et al., 2008).<br />
Until now, assessment of GMO immune adverse effects was based on the potential allergenic<br />
evaluation of the pure recombinant proteins, and only a recent study has considered the potential<br />
immunotoxicological effects of whole GMO given to rats for different periods. In addition,<br />
no studies have considered the intestinal immune response for such a purpose. However, the<br />
intestine interacts continuously with food-derived antigens, allergens, pathogens, and other<br />
noxious agents, and the gut immune system, which is the largest lymphoid tissue of the body,<br />
is crucial for mounting a correct immune response while maintaining a quiescent status toward<br />
innocuous antigens (Finamore et al., 2008, p. 11533).