Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Précis for Policy-Makers 17 MSNBC (2008). http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23922063/. Date of access: 10 August 2008. Pardey, P., James, J., Alston, J., Wood, S., Koo, B., Binenbaum, E., Hurley, T. and Glewwe, P. (2007). Science, technology and skills. International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP) center. http://www.sciencecouncil.cgiar.org. Pennisi, E. (2008). The Blue Revolution, Drop by Drop, Gene by Gene. Science 320, 171-173. Phipps, R. H. and Park, J. R. (2002). Environmental benefits of genetically modified crops: global and European perspectives on their ability to reduce pesticide use. J. Anim. Sci. Feed Sci. 11, 1-18. Pingali, P. L. and Traxler, G. (2002). Changing locus of agricultural research: will the poor benefit from biotechnology and privatization trends Food Policy 27, 223-238. Pinstrup-Andersen, P. and Cohen, M. J. (2000). Modern Biotechnology for Food and Agriculture: Risks and Opportunities for the Poor. In Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor, G. J. Persley and M. M. Lantin, eds. (Washington, D.C., CGIAR), pp. 159-169. Powles, S. B. (2008). Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manag. Sci. 64, 360-365. Pray, C. E. and Naseem, A. (2007). Supplying crop biotechnology to the poor: opportunities and constraints. J. Develop. Studies 43, 192-217. Pretty, J. (2001). The rapid emergence of genetic modification in world agriculture: contested risks and benefits. Environ. Conserv. 28, 248-262. Pryme, I. F. and Lembcke, R. (2003). In vivo studies on possible health consequences of genetically modified food and feed – with particular regard to ingredients consisting of genetically modified plant materials. Nut. Health 17, 1-8. Qaim, M. and Zilberman, D. (2003). Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries. Science 299, 900-902. Raney, T. (2006). Economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 17, 174-178. Reece, J. D. and Haribabu, E. (2007). Genes to feed the world: The weakest link Food Policy 32, 459- 479. Rivera-Ferre, M. G. (2008). The future of agriculture. EMBO Rep. 9, 1061-1066. Rosegrant, M. W. and Cline, S. A. (2003). Global food security: challenges and policies. Science 302, 1917-1919. Sagar, A., Daemmrich, A. and Ashiya, M. (2000). The tragedy of the commoners: biotechnology and its publics. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 2-4. Schiermeier, Q. (2008). A long dry summer. Nature 452, 270-273. Service, R. F. (2007). A growing threat down on the farm. Science 316, 1114-1117. Sinclair, T. R., Purcell, L. C. and Sneller, C. H. (2004). Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends Pl. Sci. 9, 70-75. Smyth, S., Khachatourians, G. G. and Phillips, P. W. B. (2002). Liabilities and economics of transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 537-541. Srinivasan, C. S. (2003). Exploring the Feasibility of Farmers’ Rights. Dev. Pol. Rev. 21, 419-447. Stewart, P. A. and Knight, A. J. (2005). Trends affecting the next generation of U.S. agricultural biotechnology: politics, policy, and plant-made pharmaceuticals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 72, 521- 523. Taberlet, P., Valentini, A., Rezaei, H. R., Naderi, S., Pompanon, F., Negrini, R. and Ajmone-Marsan, P. (2007). Are cattle, sheep, and goats endangered species Mol. Ecol. 17, 275-284. TeKrony, D. M. (2006). Seeds: the delivery system for crop science. Crop Sci. 46, 2263-2269. Thomas, Z. (2005). Agricultural biotechnology and proprietary rights. Challenges and policy options. J. World Intel. Prop. 8, 711-734. Tilman, D. (1999). Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5995-6000. Tsegaye, B. (1997). The significance of biodiversity for sustaining agricultural production and role of
18 Hope Not Hype women in the traditional sector: the Ethiopian experience. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 62, 215-227. UNEP/UNCTAD (2008). Organic Agriculture and Food Security in Africa. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2007/ 15. UNEP-UNCTAD Capacity-building Task Force on Trade, Environment and Development. Valverde, B. and Gressel, J. (2006). Dealing with the evolution and spread of Sorghum halepense. SENASA. http://www.weedscience.org/paper/Johnsongrass%20Glyphosate%20Report.pdf. van Eenennaam, A. L. and Olin, P. G. (2006). Careful risk assessment needed to evaluate transgenic fish. Cal. Ag. 60, 126-131. Vandermeer, J. and Perfecto, I. (2007). The agricultural matrix and a future paradigm for conservation. Con. Biol. 21, 274-277. Varzakas, T. H., Arvanitoyannis, I. S. and Baltas, H. (2007). The politics and science behind GMO acceptance. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nut. 47, 335-361. WHO (2005). Modern food biotechnology, human health and development: an evidence-based study. Food Safety Department of the World Health Organization. World Bank (2007). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank. Zamir, D. (2008). Plant breeders go back to nature. Nat. Genet. 40, 269-270. Zoebl, D. (2006). Is water productivity a useful concept in agricultural water management Ag. Water Manag. 84, 265-273.
Page 1 and 2: Pesticides 1
Page 3 and 4: 2 Hope Not Hype Hope Not Hype The F
Page 5 and 6: 4 Hope Not Hype Chapter Seven: Biot
Page 7 and 8: vi Hope Not Hype IR kg MAB/S μg mg
Page 9 and 10: viii Hope Not Hype shrouded in laye
Page 11 and 12: x Hope Not Hype countries. Everyone
Page 13 and 14: xii Hope Not Hype might affect tens
Page 15 and 16: xiv Hope Not Hype Denise Caruso, Ta
Page 17 and 18: 2 Hope Not Hype A SYNTHESIS of the
Page 19 and 20: 4 Hope Not Hype be a technological
Page 21 and 22: 6 Hope Not Hype The selection of la
Page 23 and 24: 8 Hope Not Hype Liability The funda
Page 25 and 26: 10 Hope Not Hype The story is the s
Page 27 and 28: 12 Hope Not Hype especially concent
Page 29 and 30: 14 Hope Not Hype Conclusions The dr
Page 31: 16 Hope Not Hype Gerbens-Leenes, P.
Page 35 and 36: 20 Hope Not Hype The many quotes an
Page 37 and 38: 22 Hope Not Hype The larger issue t
Page 39 and 40: 24 Hope Not Hype Unlike the public-
Page 41 and 42: 26 Hope Not Hype agree in ways that
Page 43 and 44: 28 Hope Not Hype References Coghlan
Page 45 and 46: 30 Hope Not Hype
Page 47 and 48: 32 Hope Not Hype The Assessment tex
Page 49 and 50: 34 Hope Not Hype Surprisingly, ther
Page 53 and 54: 38 Hope Not Hype There were two sig
Page 55 and 56: 40 Hope Not Hype makes its way into
Page 57 and 58: 42 Hope Not Hype Regulations cannot
Page 59 and 60: 44 Hope Not Hype Figure 4.1: Lysine
Page 61 and 62: 46 Hope Not Hype Even if all corn p
Page 63 and 64: 48 Hope Not Hype Whether or not som
Page 65 and 66: 50 Hope Not Hype References Antoine
Page 69 and 70: 54 Hope Not Hype The plant science
Page 71 and 72: 56 Hope Not Hype Comments such as S
Page 73 and 74: 58 Hope Not Hype nologies in Midvil
Page 75 and 76: 60 Hope Not Hype The authors of the
Page 77 and 78: 62 Hope Not Hype Tabashnik, B. E.,
Page 79 and 80: 64 Hope Not Hype So far, we do not
Page 81 and 82: 66 Hope Not Hype Does genetic engin
Page 83 and 84:
68 Hope Not Hype Bacillus producing
Page 85 and 86:
70 Hope Not Hype Box 6.1: Do insect
Page 87 and 88:
72 Hope Not Hype chemicals that can
Page 89 and 90:
74 Hope Not Hype nonetheless import
Page 91 and 92:
76 Hope Not Hype Heinemann, J. A. (
Page 93 and 94:
78 Hope Not Hype WHO (2005). Modern
Page 95 and 96:
80 Hope Not Hype The Assessment tex
Page 97 and 98:
82 Hope Not Hype adapted to tempera
Page 99 and 100:
84 Hope Not Hype either inefficient
Page 101 and 102:
86 Hope Not Hype Future productivit
Page 103 and 104:
88 Hope Not Hype The traditional sm
Page 105 and 106:
90 Hope Not Hype Critically, the pl
Page 107 and 108:
92 Hope Not Hype In places like sub
Page 109 and 110:
94 Hope Not Hype GM fish production
Page 111 and 112:
96 Hope Not Hype opportunities for
Page 113 and 114:
98 Hope Not Hype Marris, E. (2008).
Page 115 and 116:
100 Hope Not Hype either for patent
Page 117 and 118:
102 Hope Not Hype The Assessment te
Page 119 and 120:
104 Hope Not Hype The sexual flow o
Page 121 and 122:
106 Hope Not Hype From new drugs to
Page 123 and 124:
108 Hope Not Hype Figure 8.1: The g
Page 125 and 126:
110 Hope Not Hype of research...Whi
Page 127 and 128:
112 Hope Not Hype The huge proporti
Page 129 and 130:
114 Hope Not Hype BRCA genes that a
Page 131 and 132:
116 Hope Not Hype The Assessment te
Page 133 and 134:
118 Hope Not Hype Conclusions The c
Page 135 and 136:
120 Hope Not Hype Jauhar, P. P. (20
Page 137 and 138:
122 Hope Not Hype
Page 139 and 140:
124 Hope Not Hype Figure 9.1: Degre
Page 141 and 142:
126 Hope Not Hype To feed the world
Page 143 and 144:
128 Hope Not Hype
Page 145 and 146:
130 Hope Not Hype In New Zealand, t
Page 147 and 148:
132 Hope Not Hype Figure A1.1: Mole
Page 149 and 150:
134 Hope Not Hype [Generation-to-ge
Page 151 and 152:
136 Hope Not Hype Transgene RNAs wo
Page 153 and 154:
138 Hope Not Hype using an already
Page 155 and 156:
140 Hope Not Hype purposely manipul
Page 157 and 158:
142 Hope Not Hype Heinemann, J. A.
Page 159 and 160:
144 Hope Not Hype
Page 161 and 162:
146 Hope Not Hype The predominant t
Page 163 and 164:
148 Hope Not Hype References Andow,
Page 165 and 166:
150 Hope Not Hype Box A3.1: A new t
Page 167 and 168:
152 Hope Not Hype estimated to caus
Page 169 and 170:
154 Hope Not Hype 0.5% of their dai
Page 171 and 172:
156 Hope Not Hype Kroghsbo, S., Mad
Page 173 and 174:
158 Hope Not Hype developer, Aventi
Page 175 and 176:
160 Hope Not Hype References Barlet
show all

Hope Not Hype - Third World Network

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?