28.01.2015 Views

2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue

2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue

2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

List <strong>of</strong> Tables and Charts<br />

2-A. 2004 Daily Trip Demand To and From <strong>Bellevue</strong> 14<br />

2-B. 2030 Daily Trip Demand To and From <strong>Bellevue</strong> 15<br />

2-C. I-405 Corridor Program 16<br />

2-D. I-90 Two-Way Transit/HOV Project 17<br />

2-E. SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 17<br />

2-F. Nickel Package and TPA Projects 18<br />

3-C. Range <strong>of</strong> Volume-to-capacity Ratios with User Impressions 24<br />

3-D. 2000-2004 Areawide Level <strong>of</strong> Service Performance 25<br />

3-E. Concurrency Areawide Average Levels <strong>of</strong> Service 27<br />

4-A. Project Planning: From Policy to Financial Programming 29<br />

4-C. Comparison <strong>of</strong> 2001-2012 TFP and 2004-2015 TFP 33<br />

4-D. Transportation Funding as a Portion <strong>of</strong> Total CIP Budget, 1998-2011 34<br />

4-E. Sources <strong>of</strong> Funding in the <strong>2005</strong>-2011 CIP 35<br />

5-A. Main Components <strong>of</strong> the CIP Project Selection Process 39<br />

5-B. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Actual CIP spending to Adopted and Total Budget Available, 2001-<strong>2005</strong> 41<br />

5-C. Completed CIP Projects, <strong>2005</strong> 42<br />

6-A. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Requests, 2001-<strong>2005</strong> 45<br />

6-B. Implemented NTCP Phase I Measures, 2001-<strong>2005</strong> 47<br />

6-C. Implemented NTCP Phase II Measures, 2001-<strong>2005</strong> 47<br />

6-D. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Projects and Outcomes 48<br />

6-F. Transportation NEP Requests and Project Information, 2001-<strong>2005</strong> 50<br />

6-G. Neighborhood Enhancement Program Transportation Projects, <strong>2005</strong> 51<br />

6-H. Radar Sign Effectiveness 52<br />

7-A. Police Investigated Traffic Accidents, 2001-<strong>2005</strong> 55<br />

7-C. Highest Accident Intersections, <strong>2005</strong> 56<br />

7-D. Highest Accident Mid-Block Corridors, <strong>2005</strong> 57<br />

7-E. Completed Accident Reduction Program Projects, <strong>2005</strong> 58<br />

7-G. Completed Spot Improvement Projects, <strong>2005</strong> 60<br />

8-A. Street Repair Priority by Functional Class and Pavement Rating 63<br />

8-B. Roadways Meeting Pavement Rating Standards, 2001-<strong>2005</strong> 64<br />

8-C. Pavement Performance Curve 64<br />

8-E. <strong>City</strong>-Maintained Bridge Structures 66<br />

9-A. Transit Improvement Targets 72<br />

10-A. Completed Pedestrian system Projects, <strong>2005</strong> 78<br />

10-C. Pedestrian System Completion by <strong>Mobility</strong> Management Area 80<br />

11-A. Completed Bicycle System Projects, <strong>2005</strong> 83<br />

11-C. Bicycle Route Classification 85<br />

11-D. Bicycle System Completion by <strong>Mobility</strong> Management Area 86<br />

A-3. Regional <strong>Mobility</strong> Interest <strong>State</strong>ment 95<br />

A-5. Level <strong>of</strong> Service (PM peak, 2-hour Average) 98<br />

A-6. 2004-2015 Transportation Facilities Plan Project List 102<br />

A-9. Annual Accident Study – Intersections, <strong>2005</strong> 112<br />

A-10. Annual Accident Study – Mid-Block Corridors, <strong>2005</strong> 113<br />

A-11. Cost Savings to the Public from Accident Reduction Projects, 1990-<strong>2005</strong> 114<br />

124<br />

<strong>2005</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mobility</strong> <strong>Report</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!