2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue
2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue
2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 5: Capital Investment Program Implementation<br />
implementation by the year that funding becomes<br />
available. All projects in the current <strong>2005</strong>-2011 CIP<br />
are noted on Map 4-B (page 32).<br />
• A decrease in the 2003-2004 adopted budget<br />
equated to a more manageable workload for the<br />
capital projects staff than in previous years.<br />
Diagram 5-A on the previous page details steps in<br />
the CIP project selection and prioritization process.<br />
The <strong>City</strong> uses an “outcome-based” process that<br />
links the vision <strong>of</strong> the citizens — as captured in<br />
the policies <strong>of</strong> the Comprehensive Plan, learned<br />
through the public involvement process, and guided<br />
by the Transportation Commission — to capital<br />
budget funding decisions.<br />
Involve affected neighborhoods and other<br />
interested citizens in the planning and design <strong>of</strong><br />
transportation system improvements.<br />
Comprehensive Plan Policy TR-28<br />
By The Numbers<br />
During <strong>2005</strong>, the <strong>City</strong> spent approximately $22<br />
million in CIP funds to implement high priority<br />
transportation projects. The $22 million expended<br />
represents nearly 62 percent <strong>of</strong> the budget available,<br />
which is an increase from the previous year. (Budget<br />
Available refers to the budget adopted by the <strong>City</strong><br />
Council plus unspent funds from the previous year<br />
that are “carried forward” and external funding that<br />
is awarded after the budget adoption.)<br />
Chart 5-B illustrates how actual transportation<br />
CIP spending has compared to both the adopted<br />
budget and the budget available for each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
past five years. In <strong>2005</strong> the gap between actual<br />
expenditures and budget available continued to<br />
be much smaller than in the previous three years.<br />
Factors contributing to this improved expenditure<br />
rate include:<br />
• A significant level <strong>of</strong> project implementation/<br />
expenditure in 2002 reduced the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
carry-forward funds. (See the 2001-2002 <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Mobility</strong> <strong>Report</strong> for more information.)<br />
• A substantial number <strong>of</strong> larger CIP projects<br />
completed construction while on-going<br />
programs, such as Neighborhood Traffic<br />
Calming (see Chapter 6), over-expended their<br />
yearly allotments.<br />
During the past three years the Department has<br />
been able to close the gap between budget available<br />
and project expenditures, which means efficient<br />
project management is keeping projects on their<br />
expenditure timelines as defined in the CIP.<br />
CIP In Action<br />
<strong>2005</strong> brought the completion <strong>of</strong> many projects,<br />
including several that were implemented with<br />
significant community involvement and support,<br />
such as the NE 29th Place Connection project.<br />
Table 5-C lists recently completed CIP projects.<br />
In addition, several major projects were under<br />
construction and are expected to be completed in<br />
2006 or early 2007, including improvements to:<br />
• SE 16th Street, 145th Place SE to 148th Avenue<br />
SE<br />
• Lake Hills Boulevard, 150th to 156th Avenues SE<br />
• 119th Avenue SE, SE 60th Street to Lake Heights<br />
Street<br />
• 112th Avenue SE and SE 6th Street signal<br />
40<br />
<strong>2005</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mobility</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Chapter 5