2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue
2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue
2005 State of Mobility Report - City of Bellevue
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 4: Transportation Planning and Programming<br />
4-C. Comparison <strong>of</strong> 2001-2012 TFP and 2004-2015 TFP<br />
2001-2012 TFP 2004-2015 TFP Reduction<br />
Total Value <strong>of</strong> Projects Listed $284 million $174 million $110 million<br />
Total Number <strong>of</strong> Projects in Plan 98 73 25<br />
Average Project Cost $2.9 million $2.5 million $500,000<br />
The reduction in transportation funding places<br />
greater than usual importance on the transportation<br />
planning and programming process.<br />
In September, <strong>2005</strong>, the Transportation Department<br />
initiated the 2006-2017 TFP Update process, which<br />
started with the Transportation Commission and<br />
staff identifying, evaluating and prioritizing more<br />
than 100 candidate projects. On December 1, <strong>2005</strong>,<br />
the Transportation Commission recommended the<br />
proposed TFP project list for <strong>City</strong> Council approval.<br />
The list will be advanced through an evaluation<br />
process in 2006 that includes the preparation <strong>of</strong> an<br />
EIS to document the potential citywide impacts <strong>of</strong><br />
implementing the 12-year project plan.<br />
Capital Investment Programming<br />
The final step in the process to plan for and<br />
finance transportation system improvements is the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the seven-year Capital Investment<br />
Program (CIP) plan. The CIP is updated every<br />
two years. The biennial process reviews the <strong>City</strong>’s<br />
priorities and criteria for selecting projects that<br />
will vie for future funding. The <strong>City</strong>’s CIP is<br />
organized into major program areas including<br />
Parks, Public Safety, Neighborhood Enhancement,<br />
and Transportation. Each program area may be<br />
further sub-divided into project categories. The<br />
Transportation CIP is allocated to the following<br />
categories:<br />
• Roadways<br />
• Intersections<br />
• Walkways/Bikeways<br />
• Maintenance/Minor Capital<br />
Map 4-B shows the projects included in the <strong>2005</strong>-<br />
2011 CIP Plan.<br />
Table 4-D indicates the distribution <strong>of</strong> citywide CIP<br />
funds to Transportation and the sub-allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
those revenues to the specific project categories for<br />
the past five CIP cycles.<br />
Trends in Transportation Funding<br />
Chart 4-E reflects the four primary categories <strong>of</strong><br />
revenue that generally support the Transportation<br />
Program Area in the relative proportion that funded<br />
the <strong>2005</strong>-2011 CIP. The categories <strong>of</strong> funding<br />
include:<br />
• General CIP revenue, comprised <strong>of</strong> state and<br />
local option sales taxes and local business and<br />
occupation (B&O) taxes;<br />
• <strong>State</strong> and federal grants and contributions from<br />
other local agencies, such as King County and<br />
the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Redmond;<br />
• Transportation Impact Fees and other developer<br />
contributions; and<br />
• Transportation dedicated taxes and fees such as<br />
motor vehicle fuel taxes and specified portions <strong>of</strong><br />
real estate excise tax and the local B&O tax.<br />
Based on the past two CIP update cycles (2003-2009<br />
CIP and <strong>2005</strong>-2011 CIP), the following trends will<br />
need to be monitored as the department completes<br />
the 2007-2013 CIP Update process in 2006:<br />
<strong>2005</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mobility</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Chapter 4 33