14.11.2012 Views

The Qur'an in its historical context (pdf - Islam and Christian-Muslim ...

The Qur'an in its historical context (pdf - Islam and Christian-Muslim ...

The Qur'an in its historical context (pdf - Islam and Christian-Muslim ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11<br />

NOTES ON MEDIEVAL AND<br />

MODERN EMENDATIONS OF<br />

THE QUR’AN<br />

Dev<strong>in</strong> J. Stewart<br />

<strong>The</strong> publication of Christoph Luxenberg’s Die syro-aramäische Lesart des Koran:<br />

E<strong>in</strong> Beitrag zur Entschlüsselung der Qur’ansprache, <strong>in</strong> which he argues that<br />

attention to Syriac <strong>Christian</strong> vocabulary, syntax, calques, <strong>and</strong> texts enables one<br />

to “decipher” the Qur’an, thus reveal<strong>in</strong>g the secrets of <strong>its</strong> difficult <strong>and</strong> obscure<br />

passages, has provoked strong reactions, both positive <strong>and</strong> negative. 1 A celebratory<br />

review by Robert R. Phenix Jr. <strong>and</strong> Cornelia B. Horn <strong>in</strong> Hugoye, a Syriac studies<br />

journal, touts this work as a major breakthrough <strong>in</strong> Qur’anic criticism – the first<br />

serious attempt, <strong>in</strong> their estimation, to apply <strong>historical</strong> <strong>and</strong> textual criticism to<br />

the Qur’an.<br />

Not <strong>in</strong> the history of commentary on the Qur’an has a work like this been<br />

produced. Similar works can only be found <strong>in</strong> the body of text-critical<br />

scholarship on the Bible. From <strong>its</strong> method to <strong>its</strong> conclusions on the language<br />

<strong>and</strong> content of the Qur’an, Luxenberg’s study has freed scholars<br />

from the problematic tradition of the <strong>Islam</strong>ic commentators. Whether or<br />

not Luxenberg is correct <strong>in</strong> every detail, with one book he has brought<br />

exegetical scholarship of the Qur’an to the “critical turn” that biblical<br />

commentators took more than a century ago. This work demonstrates to<br />

all exegetes of the Qur’an the power of the scientific method of philology<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>its</strong> value <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g a clearer text of the Qur’an. Scholars of<br />

the first rank will now be forced to question the assumption that, from a<br />

philological perspective, the <strong>Islam</strong>ic tradition is mostly reliable, as<br />

though it were immune to the human error that pervades the transmission<br />

of every written artifact. If biblical scholarship is any <strong>in</strong>dication, the<br />

future of Qur’anic studies is more or less decided by this work. 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> reviewers <strong>in</strong> this case may know someth<strong>in</strong>g about the history of Biblical<br />

criticism but are apparently completely un<strong>in</strong>formed about the history of Qur’anic<br />

studies. Such a sweep<strong>in</strong>g claim – <strong>and</strong> one should po<strong>in</strong>t out that Luxenberg himself<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!