UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF - UDC Law Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Section 1: Bluebook Literacy Section 1 Instructions: Below are twenty questions that test your general knowledge about The Bluebook. These questions are intended both to test your understanding of the structure of The Bluebook and to require you to apply selected rules. The questions are in either multiple choice or fill-in-the-blank format. Enter your response to each question below on the provided answer form. 1. You are a law clerk who has been instructed to review a draft opinion for technical correctness. What section of The Bluebook should you refer to for rules about citations in court documents 2. You are drafting a student note for submission to your school’s law review. What section of The Bluebook should you refer to for rules about citations in law review publications 3. You are a law review associate editor who is unsure whether the italicized typeface should be used for a case name that appears in a footnote citation to an article you are editing. The citation is a “full” (i.e., not a short form) citation. Which rule should you refer to 2 Answer Options A.) Rule 2.1(c) B.) Table 13 C.) The Whitepages D.) Rule 4 E.) Rule 2.1(a) F.) Rule 10.9 G.) Table 6 4. Is the italicized typeface the correct typeface for H.) Rule 10.2.2 this citation I.) Rule 10.2.1(c) 5. You are a law review associate editor who, while editing an article that has been submitted to the J.) The Index law review, is confronted with a footnote citation to “Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. K.) The Bluepages Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908).” You know that some words in the case name should be abbreviated, _.) but Rule you 10.9, are not pg. sure which ones. Which table should you refer to 107 6. Rewrite the citation with the appropriate abbreviations. 7. Later, in the text of the article, you find another reference to “Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mottley.” You are not sure whether the abbreviation rules that apply to case names in law review footnote citations also apply to article text. Which rule should you refer to 8. Rewrite the case name with the appropriate abbreviations. 9. You are a law review associate editor. While reviewing an article that has been submitted to the law review, you discover that the author has cited an
article that appeared in the periodical “Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights.” You are not sure how the words in the periodical title should be abbreviated in a footnote citation. Which table should you refer to 10. You are also unsure which typeface should be used for the name of the periodical in a footnote citation. What rule should you refer to 11. Rewrite the periodical name in the correct typeface and with the correct abbreviations for a footnote citation. 12. You are a law review associate editor who is reviewing an article that includes a quotation from the Bible. You are not sure how to cite to the Bible, and you do not which rule contains this information. Where in The Bluebook should you begin your search 13. You are preparing a student note for submission to your school’s law review. You find yourself making a number of successive references to the same handful of sources. You are concerned that your repetitive full citations to the same sources are redundant and unnecessary, and would like general guidance regarding the use of short citation forms. What rule should you refer to 14. You are a law review associate editor. In citations to an article you are editing, you come across two case names, “Jordan v. United States Department of Justice” and “United States v. Morrison.” You know that sometimes geographic units like “United States” are abbreviated in citations, but you are not sure when. Naturally, you are concerned that the edits you submit be in complete conformity with The Bluebook. What rule should you refer to 15. Rewrite the case names with appropriate abbreviations. 16. You are a respected law professor and sought-after academic who is preparing an article for publication in a prominent law review. Throughout your article, you make several references to a case called “Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976).” Striving, as always, for economy in your citations, you would like to use a short citation form wherever possible, but your citations to this case are not all consecutive. What rule can help you determine where you may use a short citation form for this case 17. In one instance, you cite Runyon in footnote 4, and again in footnote 11. May you use a short form citation in footnote 11 18. In another instance, you make a full citation to Runyon in footnote 14, use an “id.” form citation in footnote 15, and cite Runyon again in footnote 20. May you use a short form in footnote 20 19. Rewrite the citation in the short form, citing specifically to page 170 of the opinion. 20. May you use a “supra” form for your successive, nonconsecutive references to Runyon Why or why not 3
Page 1: UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUM
Page 5 and 6: incarcerated children in the Distri
Page 7 and 8: Section 3: Writing Exercise Section
Page 9 and 10: Opinion PERRY, J. 73 So.3d 34 Supre
Page 11 and 12: activities, or statements that he e
Page 13 and 14: damaged package and notified federa
Page 15 and 16: B. “Sniff Test” at a Private Ho
Page 17 and 18: was standing in front of the door,
Page 19 and 20: justified on the basis of reasonabl
Page 21 and 22: The probable cause affidavit listed
Page 23 and 24: unwavering expectation that there w
Page 25 and 26: otherwise prompt his dog to alert.
Page 27 and 28: (quoting State v. Morsman, 394 So.2
Page 29 and 30: society recognizes as reasonable. A
Page 31 and 32: obtained through the search is not
Page 33 and 34: without implicating the Fourth Amen
Page 35 and 36: [14] The Government contends, howev
Page 37 and 38: the President and Attorney General
Page 39 and 40: nuisance. IV Blackstone, Commentari
Page 41 and 42: The other ‘eroding’ case cited
Page 43 and 44: 11 Jones v. United States, 362 U.S.
Page 45 and 46: 103 S.Ct. 2317 Supreme Court of the
Page 47 and 48: accompanying remedy. Here, for exam
Page 49 and 50: northbound on an interstate frequen
Page 51 and 52: inapplicable to the decision to iss
Page 53 and 54:
L.Ed. 1879 (1949). Justice BRENNAN
Page 55 and 56:
case. As the Court points out, “I
Page 57 and 58:
forcefully suggest that the exclusi
Page 59 and 60:
S.Ct., at 3073-3074. (WHITE, J., di
Page 61 and 62:
law-enforcement officers have recog
Page 63 and 64:
government enforcement agent.” Id
Page 65 and 66:
advance an important underlying sub
Page 67 and 68:
Americans must be that the Court gi
Page 69 and 70:
3 In Spinelli, police officers obse
Page 71 and 72:
The only reference to Hereford’s
Page 73 and 74:
v. United States, supra; Sibron v.
Page 75 and 76:
susceptible to the interpretation t
Page 77 and 78:
8 Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U
Page 79 and 80:
104 S.Ct. 1652 Supreme Court of the
Page 81 and 82:
will not be betrayed.” United Sta
Page 83 and 84:
*126 In sum, the federal agents did
Page 85 and 86:
and that search has not left incrim
Page 87 and 88:
privacy in the presence or absence
Page 89 and 90:
surrounding the use of the techniqu
Page 91 and 92:
1437, 4 L.Ed.2d 1688 (1960); Henry
Page 93 and 94:
26 See, e.g., Michigan v. Long, 463
Page 95 and 96:
Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 181, 110 S
Page 97 and 98:
how relatively warm—Kyllo was hea
Page 99 and 100:
concurring). To be sure, the homeow
Page 101 and 102:
homeowner would even care if anybod
Page 103 and 104:
4 This view comports with that of a
Page 105 and 106:
unless the dog sniff itself infring
Page 107 and 108:
probable cause to stop the car for
Page 109 and 110:
and, implicitly, the application of
Page 111 and 112:
3 Kyllo was concerned with whether
Page 113 and 114:
(500 grams and an unspecified amoun
Page 115 and 116:
authority to allow police inside th
Page 117 and 118:
AFFIRMED. We retain jurisdiction an
Page 119 and 120:
that “[t]he right of the people t
Page 121 and 122:
field” did not constitute a Fourt
Page 123 and 124:
Government’s unrestrained power t
Page 125 and 126:
y the government upon the privacy o
Page 127 and 128:
own difficulties. It involves a deg
Page 129 and 130:
search unless it is achieved by suc
Page 131 and 132:
88 Or. L. Rev. 829 Oregon Law Revie
Page 133 and 134:
hidden in open locations, such as f
Page 135 and 136:
While the Place Court’s failure t
Page 137 and 138:
location may be important in evalua
Page 139 and 140:
III Framing the Canine Home-Sniff D
Page 141 and 142:
seemingly making impermissible what
Page 143 and 144:
possessions. Without minimizing the
Page 145 and 146:
4. Even Surreptitious Canine Sniffs
Page 147 and 148:
the sniff--to the satisfaction of a
Page 149 and 150:
focused on the routineness of the a
Page 151 and 152:
6 See People v. Dunn, 564 N.E.2d 10
Page 153 and 154:
27 See Robert C. Bird, An Examinati
Page 155 and 156:
323 (Friedrich G. Barth et al. eds.
Page 157 and 158:
pre-Place decisions issued by the U
Page 159 and 160:
97 See Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.
Page 161 and 162:
121 Id. at 37 n.4 (majority opinion
Page 163 and 164:
147 462 U.S. 696 (1983). 148 See in
Page 165 and 166:
171 Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 2
Page 167 and 168:
199 As Justice Souter explained,
Page 169 and 170:
to school). 219 Cf. Katz & Golembie
Page 171 and 172:
240 See Kyllo v. United States, 533
Page 173 and 174:
263 In 2004, photographs emerged th
Page 175 and 176:
285 Id. at 1362. The story of this
Page 177 and 178:
306 But cf. Fitzgerald v. State, 86
Page 179 and 180:
328 Riley, 488 U.S. at 448 (observi
Page 181 and 182:
1 Search & Seizure § 2.3 (4th ed.)
Page 183 and 184:
establish a right to privacy therei
Page 185 and 186:
were locked and could only be opene
Page 187 and 188:
The Wright rule also should not be
Page 189 and 190:
to investigate. Noting that a metal
Page 191 and 192:
active domestic use. It housed ten
Page 193 and 194:
Ciraolo,191 involving aerial survei
Page 195 and 196:
ackyard of the building was complet
Page 197 and 198:
feet. The viewing from the helicopt
Page 199 and 200:
cases as Ciraolo, Riley and Dow man
Page 201 and 202:
premises were abandoned where all c
Page 203 and 204:
22 Young v. Harrison, 284 F.3d 863
Page 205 and 206:
37.1 McKenney v. Harrison, 635 F.3d
Page 207 and 208:
(1983); State v. Eddy, 519 A.2d 113
Page 209 and 210:
68 Dinkens v. State, 291 So.2d 122
Page 211 and 212:
eceived no answer to knock on front
Page 213 and 214:
870 (1987). In such a case, the fac
Page 215 and 216:
“Second, the agents had a legal r
Page 217 and 218:
131 United States v. Llanes, 398 F.
Page 219 and 220:
167 The reference is to the “open
Page 221 and 222:
however by fact lights were on insi
Page 223 and 224:
properly crossed defendant’s land
Page 225 and 226:
view”); State v. Merrill, 252 Neb
Page 227 and 228:
the area within the ‘curtilage’
Page 229 and 230:
is not to conclude that a search of
Page 231:
265 Such analysis was challenged by
show all

UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF - UDC Law Review

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?