30.01.2015 Views

V. Focused Fundamental Research - EERE - U.S. Department of ...

V. Focused Fundamental Research - EERE - U.S. Department of ...

V. Focused Fundamental Research - EERE - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sastry – U. Michigan<br />

V.E.2 Thermo-electrochemistry, Capacity Degradation and Mechanics with SEI Layer (U. Michigan)<br />

inside the active particle as well as the SEI layer, in the<br />

latter case by considering a misfit due to the difference in<br />

volume expansion between the two phases. For this<br />

experimental study, the interfacial impedance change as a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> cycling number and storage at various<br />

conditions is measured via the EIS technique. The<br />

composition change and thickness <strong>of</strong> the surface layer<br />

were then examined via X-ray Photoelectron<br />

Spectroscopy.<br />

Results<br />

Multiphysics FE model – The microstructure <strong>of</strong><br />

percolated particle aggregates has been generated using a<br />

Brownian dynamics simulation as shown in Figure V - 184a.<br />

(blue: active materials, red: inert materials). This<br />

microstructure <strong>of</strong> particle aggregates has been modeled for<br />

finite element analysis as shown in Figure V - 184b and Figure V<br />

- 184c. At the middle <strong>of</strong> the cathode, the temporal variation<br />

<strong>of</strong> reaction current density from the pseudo-2D thermoelectrochemical<br />

model and 3D microscopic model is<br />

compared in Figure V - 185, which reveals a 14% difference.<br />

In Table V - 4, the calculated effective diffusivity and<br />

conductivity are compared with the approach <strong>of</strong><br />

Bruggeman’s equation.<br />

(a) (b) (c)<br />

Figure V - 184: (a) aggregated structure (b) voxel mesh (c) tetrahedral mesh<br />

Figure V - 185: reaction current density<br />

Table V - 4: Change in surface atomic concentration <strong>of</strong> each element<br />

Volume<br />

fraction<br />

Bruggeman 3D<br />

microstructure<br />

D eff active/D active 0.49 0.34 0.346<br />

D eff elyte/D elyte 0.51 0.37 0.378<br />

σ eff solid/σ solid 0.49 0.34 0.300<br />

Capacity fade due to SEI layer formation - The<br />

developed model enabled us to overcome the limitation <strong>of</strong><br />

a conventional approach that assumes a steady state (at low<br />

frequencies the system may vary due to the long duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> measurement). Also, this numerical approach can<br />

facilitate the experimental studies on capacity fade due to<br />

SEI layer formation because capacity fade in Li-ion<br />

batteries comes from complex processes. The simulation<br />

demonstrated that capacity fade was accelerated as the film<br />

resistance increases, as shown in Figure V - 186a. It also<br />

demonstrated that impedance characteristics and frequency<br />

responses were changed depending on film resistance, as<br />

shown in Figure V - 186b.<br />

(a)<br />

Figure V - 186: (a) capacity change (b) frequency response function<br />

Anode particles near the separator underwent high<br />

stress due to (de)intercalation, which resulted in structural<br />

degradation <strong>of</strong> the active particles as shown in Figure V -<br />

187a. When the SEI layer was formed at the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

(b)<br />

anode particle, this layer changed the stress evolution<br />

inside the particle due to the mismatch <strong>of</strong> the partial molar<br />

volume as shown in Figure V - 187b. Also, this SEI layer itself<br />

underwent high stress due to the expansion <strong>of</strong> the active<br />

FY 2011 Annual Progress Report 633 Energy Storage R&D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!