31.01.2015 Views

Woo Young Lee Lecture Notes on Operator Theory

Woo Young Lee Lecture Notes on Operator Theory

Woo Young Lee Lecture Notes on Operator Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 5.<br />

TOEPLITZ THEORY<br />

If the answer to Problem 5.5 is affirmative, i.e., the Cowen’s remark is true then<br />

for φ = g + f,<br />

T φ is subnormal =⇒ g − λf ∈ H 2<br />

with |λ| < 1 =⇒ g = λf + c (c a c<strong>on</strong>stant),<br />

which says that the answer to Problem 5.3 is negative.<br />

When ψ is as in Theorem 5.3.12, we examine the questi<strong>on</strong>: For which λ, is T ψ+λψ<br />

subnormal <br />

We then have:<br />

Theorem 5.3.14. Let λ ∈ C and 0 < α < 1. Let ψ be the c<strong>on</strong>formal map of the disk<br />

<strong>on</strong>to the interior of the ellipse with vertices ±(1 + α)i passing through ±(1 − α). For<br />

φ = ψ + λψ, T φ is subnormal if and <strong>on</strong>ly if λ = α or λ = αk e iθ +α<br />

1+α k+1 e iθ (−π < θ ≤ π).<br />

To prove Theorem 5.3.14, we need an auxiliary lemma:<br />

Propositi<strong>on</strong> 5.3.15. Let T be the weighted shift with weights<br />

w 2 n =<br />

n∑<br />

α 2j .<br />

Then T + µT ∗ is subnormal if and <strong>on</strong>ly if µ = 0 or |µ| = α k (k = 0, 1, 2, · · · ).<br />

Proof. See [CoL].<br />

j=0<br />

Proof of Theorem 5.3.14. By Theorem 5.3.12, T ψ+αψ<br />

∼ = (1 − α 2 ) 3 2 T , where T is a<br />

weighted shift of Propositi<strong>on</strong> 5.3.15. Thus T ψ<br />

∼ = (1 − α 2 ) 1 2 (T − αT ∗ ), so<br />

(<br />

T φ = T ψ + λTψ ∗ ∼ = (1 − α 2 ) 1 2 (1 − λα) T + λ − α )<br />

1 − λα T ∗ .<br />

Applying Propositi<strong>on</strong> 5.3.15 with λ−α<br />

1−λα<br />

in place of µ gives that for k = 0, 1, 2, · · · ,<br />

λ − α<br />

∣1 − λα∣ = αk ⇐⇒ λ − α<br />

1 − λα = αk e iθ<br />

⇐⇒ λ − α = α k e iθ − λα k+1 e iθ<br />

⇐⇒ λ(1 + α k+1 e iθ ) = α + α k e iθ<br />

⇐⇒ λ =<br />

α + αk e iθ<br />

1 + α k+1 e iθ (−π < θ ≤ π) □<br />

However we find that, surprisingly, some analytic Toeplitz operators are unitarily<br />

equivalent to some n<strong>on</strong>-analytic Toeplitz operators. So C. Cowen noted that subnormality<br />

of Toeplitz operators may not be the wr<strong>on</strong>g questi<strong>on</strong> to be studying.<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!