31.01.2015 Views

Woo Young Lee Lecture Notes on Operator Theory

Woo Young Lee Lecture Notes on Operator Theory

Woo Young Lee Lecture Notes on Operator Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2.<br />

WEYL THEORY<br />

π 0f (T 2 ) = ∅, we must have that T 2 − λI is invertible and therefore λ ∈ σ(T 1 ) \ ω(T 1 ).<br />

Thus from Weyl’s theorem for normal operators we can see that λ ∈ π 00 (T 1 ) and<br />

hence λ ∈ iso σ(T 1 ) ∩ ρ(T 2 ), which by (2.3), implies that λ /∈ σ b (T ). This proves (2.8)<br />

and completes the proof.<br />

As applicati<strong>on</strong>s of Theorem 2.2.1 we will give several corollaries below.<br />

Corollary 2.2.2. If X is a Hilbert space and T ∈ B(X) is reduced by each of its<br />

finite-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al eigenspaces then σ(T ) \ ω(T ) ⊆ π 00 (T ).<br />

Proof. This follows at <strong>on</strong>ce from Theorem 2.2.1.<br />

Weyl’s theorem is not transmitted to dual operators: for example if T : l 2 → l 2 is<br />

the unilateral weighted shift defined by<br />

T e n = 1<br />

n + 1 e n+1 (n ≥ 0), (2.11)<br />

then σ(T ) = ω(T ) = {0} and π 00 (T ) = ∅, and therefore Weyl’s theorem holds for T ,<br />

but fails for its adjoint T ∗ . We however have:<br />

Corollary 2.2.3. Let X be a Hilbert space. If T ∈ B(X) is reduced by each of its<br />

finite-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al eigenspaces and iso σ(T ) = ∅, then Weyl’s theorem holds for T and<br />

T ∗ . In this case, σ(T ) = ω(T ).<br />

Proof. If iso σ(T ) = ∅, then it follows from Corollary 2.2.2 that σ(T ) = ω(T ), which<br />

says that Weyl’s theorem holds for T . The asserti<strong>on</strong> that Weyl’s theorem holds for<br />

T ∗ follows from noting that σ(T ) ∗ = ( σ(T ) ) −<br />

, ω(T ∗ ) = ( ω(T ) ) −<br />

and π00 (T ∗ ) =<br />

(<br />

π00 (T ) ) −<br />

= ∅.<br />

In Corollary 2.2.3, the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> “iso σ(T ) = ∅” cannot be replaced by the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong><br />

“π 00 (T ) = ∅”: for example c<strong>on</strong>sider the operator T defined by (2.11).<br />

Corollary 2.2.4. ([Be1, Theorem]) If X is a Hilbert space and T ∈ B(X) is reducti<strong>on</strong>isoloid<br />

and is reduced by each of its finite-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al eigenspaces then Weyl’s theorem<br />

holds for T .<br />

Proof. In view of Corollary 2.2.2, it suffices to show that π 00 (T ) ⊆ σ(T ) \ ω(T ).<br />

Suppose λ ∈ π 00 (T ). Then with the preceding notati<strong>on</strong>s, λ ∈ π 00 (T 1 ) ∩ [ iso σ(T 2 ) ∪<br />

ρ(T 2 ) ] . If λ ∈ iso σ(T 2 ), then since by assumpti<strong>on</strong> T 2 is isoloid we have that λ ∈ π 0 (T 2 )<br />

and hence λ ∈ π 0f (T 2 ). But since π 0f (T 2 ) = ∅, we should have that λ /∈ iso σ(T 2 ).<br />

Thus λ ∈ π 00 (T 1 ) ∩ ρ(T 2 ). Since T 1 is normal it follows that T 1 − λI is Weyl and so<br />

is T − λI; therefore λ ∈ σ(T ) \ ω(T ).<br />

Since hyp<strong>on</strong>ormal operators are isoloid and are reduced by each of its eigenspaces,<br />

it follows from Corollary 2.2.4 that Weyl’s theorem holds for hyp<strong>on</strong>ormal operators.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!