Contents - SPAD

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3. Looking to the Future of Bus 3.1) Introduction This chapter outlines the vision for the GKL/KV bus industry. As such this is led by the objectives and guiding principles for the LPTMP set out in Chapter 1. The LPTMP defines a 20 year plan for the LPT system of the region which meets the vision of establishing LPT as the first mode of choice. The LPTMP has established a process of identifying the selection of appropriate transport modes for different corridors. In order to meet the public‟s aspirations there are a series of requirements that bus services should meet to achieve the appropriate standard. Chapter 4 sets out more detail on the proposals of the BTP. 3.2) Vision for the Region Chapter 1 outlined the <strong>SPAD</strong> Vision for LPT in Malaysia. The National LPT Framework provides a series of guiding principles and a Planning Toolkit to assist the development of Regional LPTMP such as that for the GKL/KV region. The latter is also informed by the policies of the DBKL City Plan for KL and the Selangor Structure Plan and leads to the development of a 20 year LPTMP for the region. The GKL/KV LPTMP also build on the work undertaken for the NKRA. The latter set a short term programme of initiatives to 2012 to improve LPT in the region. The LPTMP seeks to build and expand on these into a 20 year plan. Figure 3.1 shows the relationship between the National LPT Framework and the LPTMP. The vision for the GKL/KV region recognises the need to facilitate economic growth created by the land use plan which will increase travel demands in the region and also increase congestion if measures to enhance LPT are not undertaken. This leads to the vision that for the region „LPT should be seen as the first mode of choice for a journey‟. The mechanisms to achieve the regional vision are set out in the GKL/KV LPTMP. These also respond to the quality aspects that the public would wish to see to allow them to choose LPT first. For the bus industry in particular, the public‟s requirements for the service determine the standards that are needed for service and therefore the regulatory regime that is required. Page 35
Figure 3.1: Relationship between National Vision/ Objectives and the GKL/KV LPTMP 3.3) The Greater KL/Klang Valley Land Public Transport Master Plan The development of the GKL/KV LPTMP has followed a series of logical steps as set out in the National LPT Framework and which are detailed in the BTP. The scenarios considered in developing the LPTMP have taken account of the transit gaps that are not served by existing rail services and the future land use patterns identified by the local authorities. The impact of land use is considered in terms of population and employment and how this impacts upon travel demands. The transport analysis tools assess the future travel patterns and demands particularly along the corridors in the GKL/KV region. These are compared against a corridor hierarchy based on peak passengers PPHPD. The tools provide methodologies to assess the impacts of alternative options within and between corridors. From this basis preferred corridors were identified for improvement and the proposals for the LPTMP assembled. At the same time, appropriate standards based on the public‟s requirements for a service have been defined. 3.4) Future Land Use Demands Data have been collated from the local authorities in relation to the DBKL City Plan, the Selangor State Structure Plan, Putrajaya Master Plan and local district plans. The latest versions of the plans have been reviewed to identify their data, land use policies and development proposals. From this basis, the transport recommendations of the LPTMP are developed using an independent systematic and methodological approach as outlined in this chapter. This allows consistency and integration of the LPT elements of the LPTMP with the development aspirations of the land use plans. Page 36
Page 2 and 3: Contents 1. Background ............
Page 4 and 5: 6.2) Phasing- Developing the Networ
Page 6 and 7: KLCP KLIA KLIFD KPI KTM KTMB LA LCC
Page 8 and 9: Background 1 Page 1
Page 10 and 11: 1.2) Greater KL/Klang Valley region
Page 12 and 13: the collation of existing data sour
Page 14 and 15: future of bus services. Chapter 4 l
Page 16 and 17: 2. Assessment of Current Conditions
Page 18 and 19: 2.3) Existing Bus Services The curr
Page 20 and 21: Indicator Number of Routes Fares Av
Page 22 and 23: should embrace physical and electro
Page 24 and 25: Figure 2.5: White Space Definition
Page 26 and 27: Table 2.3: Existing Fare Structure
Page 28 and 29: 2.8) Journey Times NKRA have set up
Page 30 and 31: Table 2.5: Interchange Facilities i
Page 32 and 33: Table 2.6: Bus Stop Classifications
Page 34 and 35: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV); S
Page 36 and 37: competing on heavily concentrated r
Page 38 and 39: Stakeholder‟s plans and proposals
Page 40 and 41: The shortfalls in planning, monitor
Page 44 and 45: The population forecasts assume a c
Page 46 and 47: Figure 3.3: Forecast Travel Demands
Page 48 and 49: Figure 3.6: Modelled Perceived Trav
Page 50 and 51: 3.6) Modes LPT covers a wide range
Page 52 and 53: 3.7) Corridor Hierarchy The approac
Page 54 and 55: connectivity. Bus services will als
Page 56 and 57: 3.12) Success Factors for Developin
Page 58 and 59: Developing the Future Bus Network 4
Page 60 and 61: Figure 4.1: Bus within the Hierarch
Page 62 and 63: Figure 4.2: Hierarchy and Scope of
Page 64 and 65: 4.5) Bus Rapid Transit A series of
Page 66 and 67: Dedicated Bus way - this option is
Page 68 and 69: Third stage will be introduction or
Page 70 and 71: Figure 4.8: Conceptual Network Chan
Page 72 and 73: 4.7) Other Initiatives 4.7.1) Impro
Page 74 and 75: 4.7.4) Improving Accessibility - Ne
Page 76 and 77: 4.7.7) Improving Bus Stop infrastru
Page 78 and 79: The Transition of the Bus Network 5
Page 80 and 81: trialling and refining these proces
Page 82 and 83: Table 5.1: Key LPT Policies and Obj
Page 84 and 85: Figure 5.2: Bus Industry Models of
Page 86 and 87: them to support socially necessary
Page 88 and 89: Thus the principal benefit of Net C
Page 90 and 91: Whilst a regime change from the cur
Page 92 and 93:
Whilst the existing regulatory regi
Page 94 and 95:
Phasing and Delivery 6 Page 87
Page 96 and 97:
6.1.1) New Licence Issue Section 2.
Page 98 and 99:
operational. This early phase shoul
Page 100 and 101:
Figure 6.1: Regulatory Timeline 6.2
Page 102 and 103:
Table 6.2: Summary of Benefits Obje
Page 104 and 105:
7. Summary SPAD has developed the N
Page 106 and 107:
The range of primary and secondary
show all

Contents - SPAD

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?