Contents - SPAD

More documents

Recommendations

Info

trialling and refining these processes through local trials, the “quick win” process and the more general staged implementation approach advocated. The diagram shown in Figure 5.1 identifies a process to move from the existing service provision within the industry to a new model for regulatory regime, one which will assist in developing and allocating risks and responsibilities to key stakeholders, and minimising the risk of service disruptions from outside influences to ensure effective delivery. Figure 5.1: Bus Industry Transition Process Review Transport Priorities Step 1: Setting & Agreement of Policy Objectives Step 2: Defining Transport Priorities in line with Policy Objectives Define <strong>SPAD</strong> scope & capabilities to deliver powers Step 3: Defining and Mapping of Regulatory Model Step 4: Identification of Risks associated with Regulatory Model Establish a series of Quick Wins to support in development of the transition process and test procedures and processes Step 5: Establish the role of public and private sector operations in the industry Step 6: Transition to revised regime and operations It is envisaged that the key drivers which are required (principally regulation, network design and planning, enforcement, and performance monitoring) to improve the bus service environment will be delivered as a result of moving through the keys stages (and its iterations) set out above. Page 73
5.4) Key Policies and Objectives Government policy is for the provision of LPT to be made through improved planning on an integrated basis. Within Chapter 11 of the GTP Roadmap which is entitled “Improving Urban Public Transport”, it advocates full integration of LPT in terms of inter-modal interchanges, fare systems and the provision of passenger information. It also recognises the need for transport integration to be taken into account when regulating provision, for example through revisions to the licensing of bus services and their subsequent monitoring and enforcement. The table shown below identifies the six key LPT objectives which are used as a basis for evaluating strategy and project proposals. These objectives will seek to contribute to economic and sustainable vitality of the region. The third column highlights, what the key priorities are of an effective and efficient bus network that would be necessary to support these objectives in their delivery. It is important to note that these priorities are directly related to key concerns and issues raised through the stakeholder engagement process. Page 74
Page 2 and 3:
Contents 1. Background ............
Page 4 and 5:
6.2) Phasing- Developing the Networ
Page 6 and 7:
KLCP KLIA KLIFD KPI KTM KTMB LA LCC
Page 8 and 9:
Background 1 Page 1
Page 10 and 11:
1.2) Greater KL/Klang Valley region
Page 12 and 13:
the collation of existing data sour
Page 14 and 15:
future of bus services. Chapter 4 l
Page 16 and 17:
2. Assessment of Current Conditions
Page 18 and 19:
2.3) Existing Bus Services The curr
Page 20 and 21:
Indicator Number of Routes Fares Av
Page 22 and 23:
should embrace physical and electro
Page 24 and 25:
Figure 2.5: White Space Definition
Page 26 and 27:
Table 2.3: Existing Fare Structure
Page 28 and 29:
2.8) Journey Times NKRA have set up
Page 30 and 31: Table 2.5: Interchange Facilities i
Page 32 and 33: Table 2.6: Bus Stop Classifications
Page 34 and 35: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV); S
Page 36 and 37: competing on heavily concentrated r
Page 38 and 39: Stakeholder‟s plans and proposals
Page 40 and 41: The shortfalls in planning, monitor
Page 42 and 43: 3. Looking to the Future of Bus 3.1
Page 44 and 45: The population forecasts assume a c
Page 46 and 47: Figure 3.3: Forecast Travel Demands
Page 48 and 49: Figure 3.6: Modelled Perceived Trav
Page 50 and 51: 3.6) Modes LPT covers a wide range
Page 52 and 53: 3.7) Corridor Hierarchy The approac
Page 54 and 55: connectivity. Bus services will als
Page 56 and 57: 3.12) Success Factors for Developin
Page 58 and 59: Developing the Future Bus Network 4
Page 60 and 61: Figure 4.1: Bus within the Hierarch
Page 62 and 63: Figure 4.2: Hierarchy and Scope of
Page 64 and 65: 4.5) Bus Rapid Transit A series of
Page 66 and 67: Dedicated Bus way - this option is
Page 68 and 69: Third stage will be introduction or
Page 70 and 71: Figure 4.8: Conceptual Network Chan
Page 72 and 73: 4.7) Other Initiatives 4.7.1) Impro
Page 74 and 75: 4.7.4) Improving Accessibility - Ne
Page 76 and 77: 4.7.7) Improving Bus Stop infrastru
Page 78 and 79: The Transition of the Bus Network 5
Page 82 and 83: Table 5.1: Key LPT Policies and Obj
Page 84 and 85: Figure 5.2: Bus Industry Models of
Page 86 and 87: them to support socially necessary
Page 88 and 89: Thus the principal benefit of Net C
Page 90 and 91: Whilst a regime change from the cur
Page 92 and 93: Whilst the existing regulatory regi
Page 94 and 95: Phasing and Delivery 6 Page 87
Page 96 and 97: 6.1.1) New Licence Issue Section 2.
Page 98 and 99: operational. This early phase shoul
Page 100 and 101: Figure 6.1: Regulatory Timeline 6.2
Page 102 and 103: Table 6.2: Summary of Benefits Obje
Page 104 and 105: 7. Summary SPAD has developed the N
Page 106 and 107: The range of primary and secondary
show all

Contents - SPAD

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?