11.02.2015 Views

Contents - SPAD

Contents - SPAD

Contents - SPAD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Whilst the existing regulatory regime within the industry is undertaken to some degree by <strong>SPAD</strong>,<br />

through revised licensing arrangement it is generally agreed that the regulatory process needs<br />

reform and that the transition to the revised process would need to be considered.<br />

Setting RapidKL to one side, the public sector currently does not stipulate routes; timetables or<br />

other element of bus services provision, but it does manage the licensing process for routes, and it<br />

does set and enforces fares for all passengers.<br />

In order to consider the transition from the existing regime to a new model, it is acknowledged<br />

that the public sector should:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Determine the short and long term objectives for the performance of the above<br />

Develop the necessary strategy and policies to achieve these objectives<br />

Plan, provide, secure or promote the provision of a properly integrated, safe, economical<br />

and efficient transport system by road<br />

Supervise the testing, registration and licensing of motor vehicles and drivers<br />

Supervise the regulation, management, safety and control of road traffic and the transport<br />

of passengers and goods<br />

Promote training and the welfare of those involved in providing LPT services<br />

In ensuring that these services are delivered a transition process needs to be established and<br />

implemented setting out the government‟s desires for the LPT network in terms of its day-to-day<br />

operation, the controls over competition and the mechanisms through which the network can be<br />

altered and adapted to changing travel demands and a clear process and timetable for moving from<br />

the existing licensing regime to a Gross Cost Contract Regime. This will take a number of years<br />

recognising the need to re-plan the entire network, the need to progress with tendering at a pace<br />

that operators can respond to effectively and simply the time taken to invite, assess and award<br />

contracts. Additionally it is not yet known precisely when new rail initiatives will come on stream<br />

and it will be necessary to match bus network changes with the introduction of new rail services.<br />

It is this transitional process that needs to be adopted before any radical improvements can be<br />

made to the network, so that all parties are clear as to the purpose of change, the process and<br />

timescale within which it is going to be implemented and commitment from all to support the<br />

transitional arrangements.<br />

The provision of a well planned, integrated bus network forms a central focus within an overall<br />

Integrated Transport Strategy, especially where the bus operators are provided with contractual<br />

incentives to improve the quality of the service and to maintain the inherent flexibility of roadbased<br />

LPT. However, it is important to recognise that on its own, a reform of the bus industry is<br />

unlikely to deliver the necessary transformation of bus LPT.<br />

As has been found in many situations elsewhere, it is often the implementation of a whole-scale<br />

package of transport-related measures as discussed in Chapter 4 that produces modal shift, rather<br />

than simply the provision of an improved network. It is with the LPTMP and the associated plans<br />

that the improvements that are needed within the LPT industry can be achieved. Critical to<br />

delivery of these changes, however, is the specification of standards and, as appropriate, their<br />

inclusion in route and area contracts.<br />

Page 85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!