16.02.2015 Views

Recommendations - City of West Torrens - SA.Gov.au

Recommendations - City of West Torrens - SA.Gov.au

Recommendations - City of West Torrens - SA.Gov.au

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.0<br />

Local Road Network<br />

Movement function predominate<br />

for such roads, with clearways<br />

sometimes provided to satisfy capacity<br />

requirements.<br />

In recent years, functional classification<br />

<strong>of</strong> roads have been used. For example,<br />

DTEI’s functional classification<br />

describes the predominant use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

particular road:<br />

• strategic routes (all modes)<br />

• freight routes<br />

• car (commuter) access routes<br />

• tourist routes<br />

• passenger transport routes<br />

• pedestrian zones<br />

• cycling routes<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong> road classification was<br />

considered in the Metropolitan Local<br />

<strong>Gov</strong>ernment Transport Strategy.<br />

The Strategy notes that it would<br />

be desirable to have a uniform system<br />

in the metropolitan area and this<br />

is supported.<br />

Without being overly prescriptive,<br />

it is desirable to have a uniform<br />

system for classifying roads throughout<br />

the metropolitan region.<br />

Accordingly, the following threetiered<br />

classification model is <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

for consideration:<br />

• road hierarchy (i.e. to determine<br />

road responsibility)<br />

• road functionality (i.e. to identify<br />

how a road should operate)<br />

• road land use relationship.<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> this approach is that the<br />

transport and access/land use role <strong>of</strong><br />

each road can be better described,<br />

which can lead to development <strong>of</strong><br />

clearer road performance criteria.<br />

The interrelationship between the<br />

road environment and adjacent land<br />

uses can also be better understood,<br />

along with the compromises that<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten needed in managing the<br />

available road space.<br />

MLGTS study August 2005<br />

The <strong>SA</strong> Grants Commission has also<br />

used the functionality <strong>of</strong> a road (a<br />

three-tier classification <strong>of</strong> freight,<br />

tourism and social) as part <strong>of</strong> its Special<br />

Local Roads funding considerations.<br />

The MLGTS has proposed the following<br />

functional hierarchy description:<br />

Freight route - Facilitates industry<br />

development by linking key industries<br />

to major transport routes and<br />

contributes to efficient movement <strong>of</strong><br />

large volumes <strong>of</strong> heavy freight vehicles.<br />

Primary Freight Routes link strategically<br />

important economic regions within and<br />

external to the State. Secondary Freight<br />

Routes link urban and regional freight<br />

generators and providing connections<br />

to primary freight routes –<br />

See Figure 10.<br />

Social access routes - Provides for<br />

community development and equitable<br />

access to community facilities whilst<br />

minimising the impact <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />

vehicles on the community. Routes that<br />

provide a high level <strong>of</strong> connectivity<br />

between areas (through routes),<br />

including those that supplement the<br />

arterial road network, or that provide<br />

immediate access to community spaces<br />

or recognised shopping precincts.<br />

See Figure 11.<br />

Tourist routes - provides access to<br />

tourism sites and locations and enables<br />

people to view scenic attractions in<br />

a safe and enjoyable manner. Tourist<br />

routes can be described as either being<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the attraction (i.e. destination)<br />

or part <strong>of</strong> the route to/from the<br />

destination or attraction.<br />

See Figure 12.<br />

Passenger public transport routes<br />

• routes that support the use <strong>of</strong><br />

passenger transport including<br />

strategic bus routes as well as routes<br />

that provide access to associated<br />

facilities (e.g. park-n-ride areas) –<br />

See FIGURE 8 in Section 9.0.<br />

Bicycle routes - key cycling routes –<br />

see bicycle routes in Strategic Bicycle<br />

Plan report<br />

Pedestrian routes - key pedestrian<br />

routes – to be prepared under Pedestrian<br />

Footpath Plan (See Section 8.0).<br />

The functional road hierarchy is shown<br />

in FIGURES 10 to 12.<br />

Recommendation<br />

• Adopt the proposed classical and<br />

functional road hierarchy classification<br />

<strong>of</strong> roads as shown in Figures 9 to 12.<br />

12.2 Local Network Issues<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> improvements have<br />

previously been identified for some <strong>of</strong><br />

the “collector roads”. For example, in<br />

a recent detailed traffic investigation<br />

for the Garden Terrace area in<br />

Underdale, upgrades to the Holbrooks<br />

Road junction and Garden Terrace/<br />

White Avenue junction were identified<br />

for future implementation.<br />

Table 3 provides a list <strong>of</strong> local<br />

intersections with arterial roads that<br />

have been considered in past traffic<br />

reviews or are know “problem” sites.<br />

Part 1 - Overview | Local Road Network 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!