14.11.2012 Views

CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist

CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist

CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LECTURE 2<br />

that one starts the other order of things. From the standpoint of the gods<br />

this world is less than child’s play; it is a seed in the earth, a mere potentiality.<br />

Our whole world of consciousness is only a seed of the future. And<br />

when you succeed in the awakening of Kundalini, so that she begins to<br />

move out of her mere potentiality, you necessarily start a world which is<br />

a world of eternity, totally different from our world.<br />

Here it will become clear why I speak at length about this whole<br />

problem.<br />

You remember that in our former seminars I always tried to point out<br />

to you that the series of visions was an experience of a nonpersonal or<br />

impersonal kind, and to explain to you why I was so particularly reticent<br />

in speaking about the personal side of our patient; the personal side is<br />

really perfectly negligible in comparison with her visions. Her visions<br />

could be the visions of anybody, because they are impersonal, they correspond<br />

to the world of Kundalini and not to the world of mÖlvdhvra. They<br />

are experiences which really mean the development of Kundalini and<br />

not of Mrs. So-and-So. Sure enough, a very clever analyst would be able<br />

to analyze out of that material a series of personal incidents in her life,<br />

but it would be from only the mÖlvdhvra point of view, that is, our rational<br />

point of view of this world as the definite world. But from the<br />

standpoint of the Kundalini yoga, that aspect is not interesting, because<br />

it is merely accidental. 2 mÖlvdhvra is the world of illusion from that other<br />

point of view—as the world of the gods, the impersonal experience, is<br />

naturally an illusion from the mÖlvdhvra psychology, the rational viewpoint<br />

of our world.<br />

I insist upon this particular symbolism because it really can give you an<br />

incomparable opportunity to understand what is meant by the impersonal<br />

experience, and by the peculiar duality, even duplicity, of the<br />

human psychology, where two aspects form a bewildering crisscross. On<br />

the one side the personal aspect, in which all the personal things are the<br />

only meaningful things; and another psychology in which the personal<br />

things are utterly uninteresting and valueless, futile, illusory. You owe it<br />

to the existence of these two aspects that you have fundamental conflicts<br />

at all, that you have the possibility of another point of view, so that you<br />

2 When the seminar on visions resumed on 2 November, Jung reiterated this statement:<br />

“You know I must refrain entirely from speaking of the personal life of our patient because<br />

it leads nowhere; if you begin to think of her as a personal being it will lead you astray.<br />

These visions are not to be understood in a personal way, for then it would be nothing but<br />

the subjective foolishness of one person.” The Visions Seminar, vol. 7, 7. Clearly, the excursus<br />

on the psychology of Kundalini yoga was pedagogically intended to drive home this<br />

point.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!