CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist
CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist
CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LECTURE 2<br />
that one starts the other order of things. From the standpoint of the gods<br />
this world is less than child’s play; it is a seed in the earth, a mere potentiality.<br />
Our whole world of consciousness is only a seed of the future. And<br />
when you succeed in the awakening of Kundalini, so that she begins to<br />
move out of her mere potentiality, you necessarily start a world which is<br />
a world of eternity, totally different from our world.<br />
Here it will become clear why I speak at length about this whole<br />
problem.<br />
You remember that in our former seminars I always tried to point out<br />
to you that the series of visions was an experience of a nonpersonal or<br />
impersonal kind, and to explain to you why I was so particularly reticent<br />
in speaking about the personal side of our patient; the personal side is<br />
really perfectly negligible in comparison with her visions. Her visions<br />
could be the visions of anybody, because they are impersonal, they correspond<br />
to the world of Kundalini and not to the world of mÖlvdhvra. They<br />
are experiences which really mean the development of Kundalini and<br />
not of Mrs. So-and-So. Sure enough, a very clever analyst would be able<br />
to analyze out of that material a series of personal incidents in her life,<br />
but it would be from only the mÖlvdhvra point of view, that is, our rational<br />
point of view of this world as the definite world. But from the<br />
standpoint of the Kundalini yoga, that aspect is not interesting, because<br />
it is merely accidental. 2 mÖlvdhvra is the world of illusion from that other<br />
point of view—as the world of the gods, the impersonal experience, is<br />
naturally an illusion from the mÖlvdhvra psychology, the rational viewpoint<br />
of our world.<br />
I insist upon this particular symbolism because it really can give you an<br />
incomparable opportunity to understand what is meant by the impersonal<br />
experience, and by the peculiar duality, even duplicity, of the<br />
human psychology, where two aspects form a bewildering crisscross. On<br />
the one side the personal aspect, in which all the personal things are the<br />
only meaningful things; and another psychology in which the personal<br />
things are utterly uninteresting and valueless, futile, illusory. You owe it<br />
to the existence of these two aspects that you have fundamental conflicts<br />
at all, that you have the possibility of another point of view, so that you<br />
2 When the seminar on visions resumed on 2 November, Jung reiterated this statement:<br />
“You know I must refrain entirely from speaking of the personal life of our patient because<br />
it leads nowhere; if you begin to think of her as a personal being it will lead you astray.<br />
These visions are not to be understood in a personal way, for then it would be nothing but<br />
the subjective foolishness of one person.” The Visions Seminar, vol. 7, 7. Clearly, the excursus<br />
on the psychology of Kundalini yoga was pedagogically intended to drive home this<br />
point.<br />
26