CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist
CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist
CG JUNG - Countryside Anarchist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LECTURE 2<br />
with a few poor little pieces of cloth, right inside the door, so that the<br />
baby—who was probably his child—would rise with the noble on the<br />
great day of judgment. He was quite satisfied with his own futility, but his<br />
baby, at least, should reach the sun. So this third center is rightly called<br />
the fullness of jewels. It is the great wealth of the sun, the never-ending<br />
abundance of divine power to which man attains through baptism.<br />
But of course, that is all symbolism. We come now to the psychological<br />
interpretation, which is not as easy as the symbolic or comparative<br />
method. 5 It is far less easy to understand maõipÖra from a psychological<br />
point of view. If one dreams of baptism, of going into the bath or into the<br />
water, you know what it means when people are in actual analysis: that<br />
they are being pushed into the unconscious to be cleansed; they must<br />
get into the water for the sake of renewal. But it remains dark what follows<br />
after the bath. It is very difficult to explain in psychological terms<br />
what will follow when you have made your acquaintance with the unconscious.<br />
Have you an idea? Mind you, this question is not easy to answer,<br />
because you will be inclined to give an abstract answer, for a psychological<br />
reason.<br />
Dr. Reichstein: You could say that the old world is burning down.<br />
Dr. Jung: That is not just abstract, but it is very universal and at a safe<br />
distance.<br />
Dr. Reichstein: The old conventional forms and ideas are breaking<br />
down.<br />
Dr. Jung: Oh yes, our philosophy of the world may be changed tremendously,<br />
but that is no proof that you have reached maõipÖra.<br />
Dr. Reichstein: But is not maõipÖra a symbol of fire, of things burned?<br />
Dr. Jung: Well, it is not just a destructive symbol; it means more a<br />
source of energy. But you are quite right—there is always a note of destruction<br />
when one speaks of fire; the mere mention of fire is enough to<br />
rouse the idea of destruction. And there you touch upon that fear that<br />
causes abstraction; we easily get abstract when we do not want to touch<br />
a thing that is too hot.<br />
Miss Hannah: Is one not able, then, to see the opposites at the same<br />
time?<br />
Dr. Jung: Yes, that is nicely put, very abstract, but you could designate<br />
it more completely.<br />
Mrs. Sawyer: In the visions, the patient came to the place where she had<br />
to stand the fire, and then the stars fell down. 6 So the impersonal things<br />
began.<br />
5 The contrast is to Hauer’s method of interpretation.<br />
6 See The Visions Seminar, vol. 5, 9 March 1932, 114.<br />
32