The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder
The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder
The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
120 Edges<br />
a worst - case scenario turn into alarmism or hype, the stuff <strong>of</strong> medical<br />
thriller movies?<br />
This is so much more the case when emerging infectious diseases<br />
are paired alongside the war on terrorism. In many ways, the pairing<br />
<strong>of</strong> emerging infectious disease and bioterrorism is something that is<br />
programmatically supported by the U.S. government. While bioterrorism<br />
has certainly existed for some time, it is hard to dismiss the<br />
heightened anxieties surrounding any news item concerning an infectious<br />
disease. <strong>The</strong> question up front is always: is it a bioterrorist attack?<br />
<strong>The</strong> unspoken thought, the really frustrating thought, is that<br />
the most effective bioterrorist attack may be nearly indistinguishable<br />
from a naturally occurring disease. Officials from the U.S. Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services have in the past likened their efforts<br />
to the mili tary agenda in Iraq, and public health policy in the<br />
United States after September 11, 2001, <strong>of</strong>ten combines medical and<br />
military research. 22 <strong>The</strong> disease - as - war metaphor is not new, but it<br />
takes on a new guise in the era <strong>of</strong> networks. If, as we are told, we are<br />
fighting “a new kind <strong>of</strong> war” based on networks, and if “war” has historically<br />
been the most common metaphor for talking about disease,<br />
then are we also fighting a new kind <strong>of</strong> medical terror, a new kind <strong>of</strong><br />
biopolitical war?<br />
What would be the medical analogy, then, for counterterrorist<br />
operations and counterinsurgency units? Consider the “good - virus”<br />
model applied to the outbreak <strong>of</strong> an emerging infectious disease: An<br />
epidemic is identified, and owing to its networked nature, a counternetwork<br />
deploys to confront it. An engineered microbe containing a<br />
vaccine to the epidemic agent is then released (via aerosol drones)<br />
into infected “hot zones,” and the microbial netwar is allowed to run<br />
its course. Paradoxically, the good virus will succeed in administering<br />
the vaccine only if its rate <strong>of</strong> infection surpasses that <strong>of</strong> the bad virus.<br />
This nexus <strong>of</strong> disease, medicine delivery, and military logistics is what<br />
we can expect in future evolutions <strong>of</strong> warfare.<br />
Medical Surveillance (SimSARS II)<br />
<strong>The</strong> condensed, almost aphoristic quality <strong>of</strong> many recent epidemics<br />
continually serves to remind us <strong>of</strong> the intensive nature <strong>of</strong> networks.