14.04.2015 Views

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prolegomenon 19<br />

has nothing to do with moral weakness, selling out, or any other psychological<br />

explanation. <strong>The</strong> very act <strong>of</strong> choosing, spread widely<br />

enough and freely enough, creates a power law distribution.” 8 Power<br />

law distributions help explain America’s place in the global network.<br />

Even in distributed networks, certain power centers will necessarily<br />

emerge through a sort <strong>of</strong> clustering pattern, just as certain Web sites<br />

will emerge as supernodes within the larger net. Today these power<br />

centers are called Bangalore, or Micros<strong>of</strong>t, or Archer Daniels Midland.<br />

But the fact that they have names does not discount the continuing<br />

affective force <strong>of</strong> the distributed networks they inhabit and<br />

move through.<br />

Since networked power is additive in its political strategies, control in<br />

the information age is created through the selective articulation <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

tactics here and others there.<br />

It is a case not <strong>of</strong> distributive control winning out over centralized<br />

sovereignty but <strong>of</strong> the orchestrated use <strong>of</strong> one against the other. In<br />

this sense, it is necessary for networks to exist in order that sovereignty<br />

may be created. In the rich philosophical literature on political<br />

sovereignty, sovereignty is always compromised by “the outside.”<br />

In Aquinas the earthly sovereign must still answer to God. In the<br />

secularized version <strong>of</strong> Bodin, sovereignty is limited by the good <strong>of</strong> the<br />

commonwealth (as is the case for Spinoza). In Grotius sovereignty <strong>of</strong><br />

one nation is always tempered by the sovereignty <strong>of</strong> other nations<br />

and the possibility <strong>of</strong> war.<br />

Today this same dynamic is at play. Networked power is based on a dia -<br />

lectic between two opposing tendencies: one radically distributes control into<br />

autonomous locales; the other focuses control into rigidly defined hierarchies.<br />

All political regimes today stand in some relation to networks. So it is possible<br />

to have unilateralism and networks, a fact that makes the American<br />

regime so beguiling.<br />

When a sovereign networked power is able to command globally<br />

and instantaneously, there exist what might be called “global - single”<br />

command events. By “global - single” we mean that while the networked

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!