14.04.2015 Views

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prolegomenon 9<br />

Following Foucault, to become unilateral, it is necessary to become<br />

multilateral, but via a veiled, cryptic sort <strong>of</strong> multilateralism. To become<br />

singular, one must become plural.<br />

<strong>The</strong> center <strong>of</strong> so - called American unilateralism is constructed<br />

through its network properties. In a sense, any particular presidential<br />

administration is only half aware <strong>of</strong> this. It has placed itself in a paradoxical<br />

position. To ensure the cohesion <strong>of</strong> American unilateralism,<br />

it must forge links outside its domain.<br />

Provisional Response 3: Ubiquity and Universality<br />

(the Determinist Argument)<br />

Analyses <strong>of</strong> power relations <strong>of</strong>ten spend a great deal <strong>of</strong> time on the<br />

ideological content <strong>of</strong> political struggle: how the values <strong>of</strong> Islamic<br />

fundamentalism, or U.S. arrogance, produced within a certain historical<br />

context, lead to or justify violent actions. However, there is another<br />

view that focuses on the architecture <strong>of</strong> power, not just on its<br />

ideological content.<br />

<strong>The</strong> role that communications and information networks have played in<br />

international terrorism and the “war on terror” has meant that media have<br />

now become a core component <strong>of</strong> war and political conflict.<br />

One result <strong>of</strong> this view is that media can be seen to determine the<br />

very conditions <strong>of</strong> politics: the nexus <strong>of</strong> war and media makes war<br />

less real, while its effects, following Jean Baudrillard and Paul Virilio,<br />

take on the form <strong>of</strong> technological “accidents,” “information bombs,”<br />

and a “spirit” <strong>of</strong> terrorism <strong>of</strong> which the body is a vehicle. When the<br />

terms “power” and “control” are used in this context, this is really a<br />

shorthand for the material effects <strong>of</strong> media systems—the materiality<br />

<strong>of</strong> the media is, we are told, determinant <strong>of</strong> power relations, not the<br />

reverse. For instance, from this viewpoint the networks <strong>of</strong> FedEx or<br />

AT&T are arguably more important than that <strong>of</strong> the United States in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> global economies, communication, and consumerism. This<br />

argument—what we might call a determinist argument—states that<br />

to understand the political situation, it is necessary to understand

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!