The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder
The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder
The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
76 Nodes<br />
become routine in technologically advanced sectors <strong>of</strong> the world, stem<br />
from a foundation that is at once biological and technological.<br />
Despite these aspects <strong>of</strong> biopolitics, the relation between life and<br />
politics within a technoscientific frame is never obvious, or stable. In<br />
both the sovereign and liberal democratic formations, we find what<br />
Giorgio Agamben calls a “zone <strong>of</strong> indistinction” between “bare life”<br />
(biological life) and the qualified life <strong>of</strong> the citizen (the political subject).<br />
48 In more contemporary situations, we find what Michael Hardt<br />
and Antonio Negri refer to as “living immaterial labor” (the “intellectual<br />
labor” <strong>of</strong> the IT industries, technoscience, and media industries). 49<br />
Biopolitics is therefore never an ideology but rather is a particular<br />
problem emerging within protocological relations about how and<br />
whether to distinguish “life” from “politics.”<br />
At this point, we can summarize some <strong>of</strong> the main features <strong>of</strong> the<br />
biopolitical view <strong>of</strong> networks in roughly the following way:<br />
• A shift in the object <strong>of</strong> control, from the individualized body<br />
or organism <strong>of</strong> the civil subject to the massified biological<br />
species - population.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> development and application <strong>of</strong> informatic technologies<br />
such as statistics and demographics, for calculating averages,<br />
generating hierarchies, and establishing norms.<br />
• A change in the nature <strong>of</strong> power, from the sovereign model<br />
<strong>of</strong> a command over death to a regulatory model <strong>of</strong> fostering,<br />
impelling, and optimizing life.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> making the concern for security immanent to<br />
social life while also creating networks <strong>of</strong> all types (social,<br />
economic, biological, technological, political). 50<br />
What is the relationship between the Foucauldian concept <strong>of</strong> biopoli -<br />
tics and our constellation <strong>of</strong> topics: networks, control, and protocol?<br />
We can start by saying that in the way in which it operates, biopolitics<br />
conceives <strong>of</strong> networks as existing in real time and therefore as<br />
existing dynamically. Biopolitics is a mode in which protocological<br />
control manages networks as living networks. In the biopolitical perspective,<br />
we perceive a strategic indiscernibility between an informatic<br />
view <strong>of</strong> life and the notion <strong>of</strong> “life itself.” <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> “life itself ”