14.04.2015 Views

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nodes 67<br />

As a concept, swarming derives from biological studies <strong>of</strong> social<br />

insects and their capacity to collectively carry out complex tasks:<br />

the construction <strong>of</strong> a nest by wasps, the coordinated flashing among<br />

fireflies, the cooperative transportation <strong>of</strong> heavy loads by ants, the<br />

global thermoregulation <strong>of</strong> a nest by bees, and so on. 36 Each <strong>of</strong> these<br />

examples illustrates the basic rules <strong>of</strong> biological self - organization,<br />

how a set <strong>of</strong> simple, local interactions culminates in complex, collective<br />

organization, problem solving, and task fulfillment. In philos -<br />

ophy, the relationship between humans and insects far predates such<br />

scientific studies: Aristotle, in calling the human being a “political animal,”<br />

made a direct contrast to the insect; Hobbes stressed the human<br />

capacity to emerge out <strong>of</strong> the “state <strong>of</strong> nature” through the giving up<br />

<strong>of</strong> rights to a sovereign, a capacity lacking in insects; Marx acknowledged<br />

the capacity <strong>of</strong> insects to build but emphasized the human capacity<br />

for idealization as part <strong>of</strong> their “living labor”; and Bergson,<br />

expressing a poetic wonder at the ability <strong>of</strong> insects to self - organize,<br />

suggested that evolution was multilinear, with human beings excelling<br />

at “reason” and insects excelling at “intuition.”<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is an entire genealogy to be written from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

challenge posed by insect coordination, by “swarm intelligence.” Again<br />

and again, poetic, philosophical, and biological studies ask the same question:<br />

how does this “intelligent,” global organization emerge from a myriad<br />

<strong>of</strong> local, “dumb” interactions?<br />

Arquilla and Ronfeldt also ask this question, but they limit their<br />

inquiry to military applications. Building on the military - historical<br />

work <strong>of</strong> Sean Edwards, their analysis is ontological: it is about the relationship<br />

between enmity and topology. <strong>The</strong>y distinguish between<br />

four types <strong>of</strong> aggregate military diagrams: the chaotic melee (in which<br />

person - to - person combat dominates, with little command and control),<br />

brute - force massing (where hierarchy, command formations,<br />

and a battle line predominate), complex maneuvers (where smaller,<br />

multilinear, selective flanking movements accompany massing), and<br />

finally swarming (an “amorphous but coordinated way to strike from<br />

all directions”). 37 While elements <strong>of</strong> each can be found throughout<br />

history (horse - mounted Mongol warriors provide an early swarming

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!