14.04.2015 Views

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

The Exploit: A Theory of Networks - asounder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142 Edges<br />

operates according to different relations <strong>of</strong> matter - form. Furthermore,<br />

metallurgy, or the idea <strong>of</strong> un métal pur, has nothing to do with the<br />

forging <strong>of</strong> swords or coins per se. “Not everything is metal, but metal<br />

is everywhere.” <strong>The</strong>re is a metallurgy that cuts across all complex<br />

matter, a sort <strong>of</strong> contagion <strong>of</strong> metallomorphic patterns, recombi na -<br />

tions <strong>of</strong> bits and atoms, a metalmorphosis <strong>of</strong> living forms that is not less<br />

ambivalent for its being metallurgic: “<strong>The</strong> huge population <strong>of</strong> viruses,<br />

combined with their rapid rates <strong>of</strong> replication and mutation, makes<br />

them the world’s leading source <strong>of</strong> genetic innovation: they constantly<br />

‘invent’ new genes. And unique genes <strong>of</strong> viral origin may travel, finding<br />

their way into other organisms and contributing to evolutionary<br />

change.” 48<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hypertrophy <strong>of</strong> Matter (Four Definitions and<br />

One Axiom)<br />

Definition 1. Immanence describes the process <strong>of</strong> exorbitance, <strong>of</strong> desertion,<br />

<strong>of</strong> spreading out. <strong>Networks</strong> cannot be thought without thinking<br />

about immanence (but not all networks are distributed networks).<br />

Immanence is not opposed to transcendence but is that which distributes<br />

in transcendence. Immanence is formally not different from<br />

self - organization. Immanence is ontologically not different from what<br />

Spinoza describes as causa sui.<br />

Definition 2. Emptiness is an interval. Emptiness is “the space between<br />

things,” or what in graph theory is called an edge. Emptiness is<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> space, as if in itself. Emptiness is always “n1.” It is<br />

the pause that constitutes the network.<br />

Definition 3. Substance is the continual by - product <strong>of</strong> the immanence<br />

<strong>of</strong> emptiness. Substance is the effect, not the cause, <strong>of</strong> networks,<br />

akin to what graph theory calls a node. Substance is the point<br />

at which monism and pluralism implode. Substance is the indistinction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the one and the many, the production <strong>of</strong> the nodes that constitute<br />

a network.<br />

Definition 4. Indistinction is the quality <strong>of</strong> relations in a network.<br />

Indistinction is the “third attribute” never postulated by Spinoza<br />

(thought, extension, indistinction). Indistinction is not nondistinc-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!