16.11.2012 Views

Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF

Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF

Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

aspect ratio characteristic <strong>of</strong> CinemaScope prints up to the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

50s: 1:2.55. Today’s common scope ratio is more narrow (1:2.35), and all<br />

Lola Montes prints struck after 1957 show this narrow aspect ratio,<br />

which has cut the frame at the left side to have room for an optical<br />

sound track. To illustrate this problem, some technical notes:<br />

CinemaScope wants to make a picture with double width out <strong>of</strong> a<br />

normal 35mm film by means <strong>of</strong> an anamorphic lens, squeezing the<br />

picture while filming and printing in the ratio <strong>of</strong> 1 to 2, and<br />

unsqueezing it in projection - technically a simple process, yet having to<br />

contend with problems <strong>of</strong> blurring. The definition <strong>of</strong> a picture twice as<br />

big as the 35mm frame it’s taken from is rather bad. Hence the<br />

industry’s efforts to use the entire picture (with its side ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:1.33),<br />

as in silent film. In unsqueezing projection, this picture has a side ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1:2.66, the 4 channel magnetic sound being played independently<br />

from a band player. Yet, during the production <strong>of</strong> 20th Century Fox’s The<br />

Robe (1953), the first scope film, a special process was already invented,<br />

to bring four magnetic sound stripes directly onto the picture: the<br />

sprocket holes were reduced and the sound stripes brought on on both<br />

sides <strong>of</strong> the left holes. The side aspect ratio <strong>of</strong> such a picture, which is<br />

only minimally reduced on its left side, is 1:2.75, which makes 1:2.55 in<br />

unsqueezing projection.<br />

Those magnetic sound prints needed special projectors and sound<br />

systems that only bigger first-run theatres could afford. Smaller<br />

cinemas required optical sound prints, in which the picture frame was<br />

reduced on the left by about 10%, thus creating an aspect ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:2.35.<br />

The smaller scope ratio caught on because it is best adaptable to other<br />

gauges, and even more so since multi-channel sound became possible<br />

with Dolby Stereo optical sound. If nowadays new prints are made from<br />

old Scope films, their left side is cut just as easily, as one did for decades<br />

with silents when printing them in the sound film gauge. With many<br />

films, this does not show all that much, but with Lola Montes, a film<br />

which uses the scope frame to its full extent, information is cut and the<br />

symmetry <strong>of</strong> the pictures composition is ruined.<br />

[SCHEDULE 3]<br />

[PHOTO MAG]<br />

[FRAME2,55]<br />

FILM FRAME<br />

FOR 1:2,55 PROJECTION<br />

the full aperture 1:1,33 frame is slightly cropped on the left side<br />

the perforation holes are smaller than usual to have space for<br />

the 4 channel magnetic sound tracks<br />

(all 4 channel magnetic track films <strong>of</strong> the fifties have this format)<br />

[PHOTO OPT]<br />

[FRAME2,35]<br />

FILM FRAME<br />

FOR 1:2,35 PROJECTION<br />

the silent 1:1,33 frame is heavily cropped on the left side to have<br />

space for the optical sound<br />

(all optical cinemascope prints have this format)<br />

11 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Preservation</strong> / 65 / 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!