You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ties <strong>that</strong> Bind<br />
187 India’s contribution to the<br />
Great War (Calcutta, 1923) p.221<br />
188 Mahatma Gandhi, Gandhi:<br />
Hind Swaraj and other writings<br />
(Cambridge, 1997)<br />
44 | policyexchange.org.uk<br />
recognition of the contribution which men from across the Commonwealth<br />
made to the British war effort. Indeed, shortly after the war the British<br />
government in India concluded:<br />
The Indian Corps reached France in the nick of time and helped to stem the German thrust<br />
towards Ypres and the Channel Ports during the autumn of 1914...India has sound reason to<br />
be proud of the way she surmounted the inherent obstacles and obtained such a marvellous<br />
result. 187<br />
This is the history of the victorious – but voiceless – to which we must now give<br />
fuller expression and understanding.<br />
Second World War<br />
Through Indian eyes the Second World War was an altogether different affair to<br />
the First. Whereas there had been enthusiastic support for the British war effort<br />
in 1914 and a desire to demonstrate Indian loyalty to the Crown – of course, with<br />
one eye firmly fixed on winning further freedoms for India – by 1939 the revival<br />
of European hostili<strong>ties</strong> was seen by many as more of an inconvenience. Certainly,<br />
the unravelling of the Ottoman Empire over two decades earlier meant there was<br />
no obvious conflict between political and spiritual powers for Muslim <strong>sep</strong>oys in<br />
1939 as there had previously been. Moreover, this time, any rallying to the colours<br />
was seen by some as being at odds with the aspirations of the Indian National<br />
Congress.<br />
Indian Muslims, Congress and the looming war<br />
The growing autonomy Indians enjoyed at provincial and national levels meant<br />
<strong>that</strong> throughout the 1930s, Indian leaders were less concerned by internecine<br />
strife within Europe. After all, the Congress was finally beginning to realise its<br />
vision and in 1938 succeeded in winning eight out of eleven provincial<br />
assemblies. A decision, however, was made by Lord Linlithgow, the Viceroy – who<br />
announced in September 1939 <strong>that</strong> India would once again contribute to Britain’s<br />
war effort. The Congress was outraged <strong>that</strong> it had not been consulted and refused<br />
to cooperate with the Viceroy’s command. This prompted a wave of resignations<br />
from Congress-controlled provincial assemblies. Of course, the Congress did not<br />
support Hitler; but things were very different from what they had been on the<br />
outbreak of the Great War. In part, this was borne out of frustration <strong>that</strong> the<br />
rewards for Indian participation in 1914 had been so limited. Congress and others<br />
now considered India to be on the verge of independence, and the war was<br />
therefore regarded by some as an impediment to political development. 188<br />
Gandhi also advised Britain against conflict, arguing instead for the pursuit of<br />
non-violent means against Nazi expansionism. In an open letter he urged:<br />
No cause, however just can warrant the indiscriminate slaughter <strong>that</strong> is going on minute to<br />
minute ... I do not want Britain to be defeated, nor do I want her to be victorious in a trial of<br />
brute strength ... I want you to fight Nazism without arms ... I want you to lay down the arms<br />
you have as being useless for saving you or humanity. You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor<br />
Mussolini to take what they want of the countries you call your possessions. Let them take