10.07.2015 Views

here - Sites personnels de TELECOM ParisTech - Télécom ParisTech

here - Sites personnels de TELECOM ParisTech - Télécom ParisTech

here - Sites personnels de TELECOM ParisTech - Télécom ParisTech

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.1. Further background on elliptic curves 133following fundamental result.Theorem 5.1.1 ([244, Theorem II.2.3], [128, Proposition II.6.8]). Let K be a perfect field. Letφ : C 1 → C 2 be a morphism between algebraic curves <strong>de</strong>fined over K. Then φ is constant orsurjective (over K).Basic properties of morphisms between algebraic curves are <strong>de</strong>fined using the canonicallyassociated maps on the corresponding function fields.Definition 5.1.2 (Function field). Let K be a perfect field and C algebraic curve <strong>de</strong>fined on K.We <strong>de</strong>note by K(C) the function field of C.Definition 5.1.3. Let K be a perfect field. Let φ : C 1 → C 2 be a non-constant morphismbetween algebraic curves <strong>de</strong>fined over K. Different homomorphisms between the function fields ofthe curves can be <strong>de</strong>fined from a morphism between the curves:• φ ∗ : K(C 2 ) → K(C 1 ), g ↦→ g ◦ φ,• φ ∗ = (φ ∗ ) −1 ◦ N K(C1)/φ ∗ K(C 2).First, these maps can be used to completely characterize a morphism.Theorem 5.1.4 ([244, Theorem II.2.4], [128, Corollary I.6.12, Proposition II.6.8]). Let K be aperfect field. Let C 1 and C 2 be two curves <strong>de</strong>fined over K.1. Let φ : C 1 → C 2 be a non-constant morphism. Then K(C 1 ) is a finite extension ofφ ∗ K(C 2 ).2. Let i : K(C 2 ) → K(C 1 ) be an injection leaving K fixed. Then t<strong>here</strong> exists a uniquenon-constant morphism φ : C 1 → C 2 such that i = φ ∗ .3. Let K ′ ⊂ K(C 1 ) be a subfield of finite in<strong>de</strong>x containing K. Then t<strong>here</strong> exists a smooth curveC ′ , unique up to K-isomorphism, and a morphism φ : C 1 → C ′ such that K ′ = φ ∗ K(C ′ ).Second, two very important quantities are <strong>de</strong>fined using the function fields.Definition 5.1.5 (Degree). Let K be a perfect field. Let φ : C 1 → C 2 be a morphism betweentwo algebraic curves <strong>de</strong>fined over K.If φ is constant, thenwe <strong>de</strong>fine its <strong>de</strong>gree <strong>de</strong>g(φ) = 0.Otherwise, φ is surjective and its <strong>de</strong>gree is <strong>de</strong>fined as<strong>de</strong>g(φ) = [K(C 1 ) : φ ∗ K(C 2 )],i.e. the dimension of the φ ∗ K(C 2 )-vector space K(C 1 ).The morphism φ is said to be separable, inseparable or purely inseparable, if the extension offunction fields is; the separable and inseparable <strong>de</strong>grees <strong>de</strong>g s (φ) and <strong>de</strong>g i (φ) are <strong>de</strong>fined accordingly.Definition 5.1.6 (Ramification in<strong>de</strong>x). Let K be a perfect field. Let φ : C 1 → C 2 be a nonconstantmorphism between smooth curves <strong>de</strong>fined over K. Let P ∈ C 1 . The ramification in<strong>de</strong>xof φ at P is <strong>de</strong>fined ase φ (P ) = ord P (φ ∗ t φ(P ) )w<strong>here</strong> t φ(P ) ∈ K(C 2 ) is a uniformizer at φ(P ) (i.e. ord φ(P ) (t φ(P ) ) = 1).An application of these quantities is the study of the number of preimages of a point. Forexample, the <strong>de</strong>gree is equal to the sum of ramification indices at the preimages of any point, andthe separable <strong>de</strong>gree is equal to the number of preimages of a point except for a finite number ofthem [244, Proposition 2.6].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!