Journal International Law_N2-10.indd

More documents

Recommendations

Info

saerTaSoriso samarTlis Jurnali, #2, 2010 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, N2, 2010Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its protocols in 1950; the InternationalCovenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant on Economic,Social and Cultural Rights, both in 1966; the American Convention on HumanRights in1969 and the African Charter on Human Rights and Peoples’ Rights in1981.4Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969); See alsoMagdalena Sepulveda, “The Nature of the Obligations under the InternationalCovenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”, Intersentia, Antweren –Oxford – New York, 2003, p. 6.5Thomas Buergenhtal, “To Respect and to Ensure: State Obligations andPermissible Derogations”, in The International Bill of Rights, (1981), p. 78.6Manfred Nowak “U.N. Convention on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary”N.P. Engel. Publisher 1993, p. 73.7Supra note 4, Sepulveda “The Nature of the Obligation”, p. 295.8Supra note 6, Nowak “CCPR Commentary” p.73.9“Clawback” clauses are understood to mean provisions that permit, in normalcircumstances, a breach of an obligation for specifi ed public reasons. As defi nedin Higgins, “Derogations”, p. 28110Supra note 2, Higgins, “Derogations”, p. 28111Mcdougal, Lasswell and Cheng “The Aggregate Interests in Shared Respect andHuman Rights: Harmonization of Public Order and Civic Order” Yale Law Journal,cited in Higgins “Derogations” at p.28212Supra note 2, Higgins, “Derogations”, p. 28113Myres McDoug “Human Rights and Public Order: Principles of Content andProcedure for clarifying General Community Policies”, Virginia Journal ofInternational Law , 14 (1974), p. 386 at p. 390 cited in Higgins, “Derogations”, p.281.14Article 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.15Article 27 of the American Convention on Human Rights Article.16Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights and FundamentalFreedoms.17See James O’Donnell, “States of Exception”, In The Review of InternationalCommission of Jurists, vol. p. 52 (1978)18Supra note 6, Nowak “CCPR Commentary” p.7419Id.20Article 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.21Id.22Under the ICCPR non-derogable norms represent: right to life (Art. 6), prohibitionof torture (Art.7), prohibition of slavery (Art. 8), prohibition of the detention for debt(Art. 11), prohibition of retroactive criminal laws (Art. 15), recognition of legal personality(Art. 16) and freedom of thought, religion, continence and belief (Art 18).23Article 15(1) ECHR24Id. Article 15(3)25Non-derogable rights under ECHR are: right to life, except in respect of deathsresulting from lawful acts of wars (Art. 2), prohibition of torture (Art. 3), prohibitionof slavery and forced labor (Art. 4 (1)) and no punishment without a law (Art. 7).26Supra note 6, Nowak “CCPR Commentary” p74.27Supra note2, Higgins, “Derogations”, pp. 282-283.28In 1952, the word “war” was deleted from the draft of the ICCPR by the HRCommission, to avoid any possible misunderstandings that the UN acceptedwar.29By 1993 more than 16 countries that derogated from their rights under the ICCPRused such grounds as social unrest, subversive activities, vandalism, guerilla war,146
T. GOLETIANI, DEROGATION CLAUSE AND THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTSethnic confl icts, terrorism etc. See CCPR/C/2/Rev.3. reproduced in the Appendixin Nowak “CCPR Commentary” p780.30Supra note 4, Sepulveda “The Nature of the Obligation”, p. 297.3110 GAOR Annexes, UN Doc, A/2929, part II,/ch.5, para.39 (1955).32Supra note 5, Buergenthal “State Obligations”, p. 7833Case of Lawless v. Ireland, Application n o 332/57 3 Pub. Eur. Ct. Human RightsSer. A, para 28 (1961).34Greek case Y.B. Eur. Conv. Human Rights para. 153 (1969).35Case of Ireland v. United Kingdom, Application n o 5319/71. ECtHR, Judgment 18January 1978 para 248.36Supra note 5, Buergenthal “State Obligations”, p.80.37See Study prepared by the International Commission of Jurists, “State ofEmergency: Their Impact on Human Rights”.1983, p. 414.38Supra note 6, Nowak “CCPR Commentary” p79.39See UN Doc. CCPR/C/SR/ 128 (1979) cited in Joan Fitzpatrick “Human Rights inCrises: International System For Protecting Rights During States of Emergency”,University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994 pp. 87-88.40Supra note, Nowak “CCPR Commentary” p79.41Landinelli Silva v Uruguay (1981) HRC Comm No 34/1978, [8.3].42Diplomatic Communications to H.E. Ban Ki-moon and H.E. Terry Davis, Achievesof Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia, International Law Department November2007.43The press realize of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia November 23, 2007available at www.mfa.gov.ge44Supra note 2 Higgins, “Derogations”, p. 187.45Supra note 2 Higgins, “Derogations”, p. 187.46Limburg Principles on the Implementation of the International Covenant onEconomic, Social and Cultural Rights No 48, 50 and 5147Id No 49.48Id. No 5649Supra note 4, Sepulveda “The Nature of the Obligation”, p. 280.50Supra note 46, Limburg Principles, 52; See also General Comment No 13 Rightto Food, of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, para. 42 andGeneral Comment No14, Highest Attainable Standard of Health of the Committeeon Economic, Social and Cultural Rights para. 28.51Philip Alston & Gerard Quinn, “The Nature and Scope of State Parties’ Obligationsunder the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”,Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 9 No. 2 (1987), p. 202.52Concluding Observations Iraq E/1998/22 paras 253, 254 and 269.53Concluding Observations Guatemala E/1997/22 para. 12354Concluding Observations Sri Lanka E/1998/22 paras 69-74.55Concluding Observations Peru E/1998/22 para. 141.56See supra note 53, General Comment No 13 para. 42 and General CommentNo14 para. 28.57Supra note 4, Sepulveda “The Nature of the Obligation”, p. 285; See also, supranote 2, Higgins “Derogations” p. 287.58Malcolm N. Shaw, “International Law” Fifth Edition, Cambridge University Press,2003, p. 707.59The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction,Text and Commentaries / [compiled by] James Crawford, Cambridge; New York,Cambridge University Press, 2002 p. 183.60Draft Articles on the Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts, withCommentaries, Report of International Law Commission on the Work of its 53 rdSession. United Nations, 2008 p. 76.147
Page 1:
ivane javaxiSvilis sax. Tbilisis sa
Page 5 and 6:
Zalis gamoyenebis samarTlebriviaspe
Page 7 and 8:
x. burkaZe, Zalis gamoyenebis samar
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 18 and 19:
saerTaSoriso samarTlis Jurnali, #2,
Page 20 and 21:
KHATUNA BURKADZELEGAL ASPECTS OF TH
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
ZURAB SANIKIDZEPROBLEMS WITH THE DE
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
IVANE ABASHIDZEPROTECTION OF REFUGE
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97: saerTaSoriso samarTlis Jurnali, #2,
Page 102 and 103: NINO ABRAMISHVILIHUMAN RIGHTS OBLIG
Page 176 and 177: NINO PARSADANISHVILITRAFFICKING PRE
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
TAMAR SADRADZEETHICAL AND LEGAL PRO
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
paata cincaZesaerTaSoriso samarTlis
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
PAATA TSINTSADZEKOSOVO: NORMS AND C
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
show all

Journal International Law_N2-10.indd

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?