Journal International Law_N2-10.indd

i. abaSiZe, ltolvilTa dacva erTiani evropuli TavSesafris sistemis pirobebSi. Sesabamisoba...53Case C-540/03 Parliament v Council and Commission, judgment of 27 June 2006,paras 62-64, not yet reported.54Doc. 14348/02 JUR 449 ASILE 67, 15 November 2002, paras 5 and 7. Offi cialaccess to this document has been refused by the Council (with the vote againstby Sweden). See Letter from the General Secretariat of the Council of 23 May2005, refusing full access to Documents 10560/02 and 14348/02, Doc. 9727/05INF 111 API 85 JUR 240, of 3 June 2005. However, the document is available at:http://www.statewatch.org/newx/2002/dec/14348.02.doc. diskusia aRniSnulsakiTxze ix.: MT Gil-Bazo ‘Refugee status, subsidiary protection, and the rightto be granted asylum under EC law’ New Issues in Refugee Research, ResearchPaper No. 136 (Geneva, UNHCR, November 2006) 14-20.55ix. for instance, Case C-280/93 Germany v Council [1993] ECR I-4973 and CaseC-122/95 Germany v Council [1995] ECR I-973.56T.I. v the United Kingdom, decision of 7 March 2000, 15, Reports of Judgmentsand Decisions 2000-III.57Schengen Agreement Between the Governments of the States of the BeneluxEconomic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic onthe Gradual Abolition of Checks at the Common Frontiers, published at (1991) 30International Legal Materials 73.58Convention Applying the Schengen Agreement of 14 Jun 1985 Between theGovernments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republicof Germany and the French Republic on the Gradual Abolition of Checks at theCommon Frontiers, published at (1991) 30 International Legal Materials 84.59Convention determining the State responsible for examining applications for asylumlodged in one of the Member States of the European Communities - DublinConvention. [1997] OJ C254/1.60Article 24 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishingthe criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsiblefor examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by athird-country national. [2003] OJ L50/1.61Commission staff working paper, ‘Revisiting the Dublin Convention: developingCommunity legislation for determining which Member State is responsible for consideringan application for asylum submitted in one of the Member States’ SEC(2000) 522, punqti 55.62iqve, punqti 59.63Recital 2 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishingthe criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsiblefor examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by athird-country national [2003] Offi cial Journal L50/1.64ix. the House of Lords decision in the case of Regina v. Secretary of State forthe Home Department, Ex Parte Adan Regina v. Secretary of State for the HomeDepartment, Ex Parte Aitseguer (Conjoined Appeals), judgment of 19 December2000. The House of Lords ruled against the removal of the two applicants toFrance and Germany in application of the Dublin Convention on the grounds thatthe interpretation of the Geneva Convention made by those countries did not guaranteethe protection of the applicants.65T.I. v the United Kingdom, decision of 7 March 2000, 15, Reports of Judgmentsand Decisions 2000-III.66Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrantand the surrender procedures between Member States (2002/584/JHA); [2002]OJ L190/1.67muxlebi 23(4)(c)(ii), 25(2)(c), 27, da 36., Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States forgranting and withdrawing refugee status [2005] OJ L326/13.68Letter from the UK Government, ix. sqolio 6.69C. Phuong, ‘Identifying states’ responsibilities towards refugees and asylum seekers’.Paper presented at the ESIL Research Forum on International Law, May2005. ixileT Semdeg bmulze: www.ssrn.com (25.11.2009).70A. Fortín, The ‘Safe Third Country’ Policy in the light of the international obligationsof countries vis-à-vis refugees and asylum seekers (London, 1993), paras. 1.1-1.2and 2.2-2-3. ixileT Semdeg bmulze: www.ssrn.com (25.11.2009).75