23.11.2012 Views

Master Thesis - Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg

Master Thesis - Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg

Master Thesis - Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. Conclusion and Outlook <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Thesis</strong> Björn Ostermann page 115 of 126<br />

7 Conclusion and Outlook<br />

7.1 Conclusion<br />

This work shows new ways towards a collaborative workplace, using a 3D camera and a PC program,<br />

to allow an industrial robot and humans to work alongside each other.<br />

Two approaches towards this goal have been implemented in the course of the project. The first is a<br />

speed control based on proximity monitoring. The second is a path planning algorithm that plans a<br />

collision free trajectory of the robot arm, based on the location of dynamic objects, the position of the<br />

robot and its goal.<br />

The resulting demonstrator, programmed during the course of this work, uses both approaches<br />

separately, demonstrating their functionality. The developed workplace has been successfully<br />

demonstrated during presentations at the BGIA and has proven to function reliably. While still tasks<br />

remain for further studies (see chapter 7.2), the stability of the system was seldom disturbed by outside<br />

influences. Only two specific pieces of clothing (a grey jeans and a black shirt) proved to be<br />

problematic to the developed algorithm because of their unexpected values from the 3D camera’s<br />

measurement.<br />

Due to a problem in the external control mode of the robot, which is caused by the robot’s PLC, the<br />

robot tends to judder if goal changes occur in the direct drive mode. This has no influences on the<br />

functionality but only in the smoothness of the path execution in this mode.<br />

The algorithms, the PC and the sensor equipment used in the demonstrative workplace have not been<br />

designed towards the necessary safety, but have only been implemented for this case study. The safety<br />

of the system at this stage is ensured by the application of a hold to run button.<br />

If the complete project is implemented for industrial purpose and both approaches are combined, only<br />

the control of the robot’s speed needs to be safe. The trajectory will only allow the robot to use its full<br />

potential. The advantage of this approach, other than the reduced demand on the safety of the planning<br />

of the trajectory, is that the algorithm of the trajectory planning can be changed afterwards without<br />

reevaluation of the safety of the whole system.<br />

As chapter 6.3 showed, the system is not ready for industrial application at this point. In chapter 6.5 a<br />

conclusion was formulated from the observed performances, resulting in the observation that the<br />

designed system, implemented in special hardware, could be used to control a robot at 2 m/sec with a<br />

safety distance of 500 mm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!