distribution is a corollary of the limit theorem extended onto the appropriate sums of smallvariables.I shall not tire you with the precise formulation of the results concerning the necessary <strong>and</strong>sufficient conditions for the applicability of the limit theorem as obtained by variousmathematicians. Research in this field distinguished by extreme subtlety <strong>and</strong> deepness islinked with the main problem in analysis <strong>and</strong> makes use of two externally different methods.One of these, the method of expectations of the consecutive powers, or of moments, whoseidea is due to {Bienaymé <strong>and</strong>} Chebyshev, underlies Markov’s fundamental works. Itconsists in solving a system of an infinite number of equations in an infinite number ofunknowns by the algorithm of continued fractions; the solution is directly connected with theproblem of summing everywhere divergent Taylor series. The second method applied byLiapunov, that of characteristic functions, is based on the Dirichlet discontinuity factor thatconnects the calculation of the limiting probability with the theory of improper integrals <strong>and</strong>trigonometric series 11 .The just mentioned scholars had investigated the case of sums of independent variableswith an exhaustive completeness, <strong>and</strong> the later work of Lindeberg, Pólya <strong>and</strong> others, withoutintroducing essentially new ideas, has only simplified some proofs <strong>and</strong> provided another,sometimes more general formulations for the results of Liapunov <strong>and</strong> Markov.Here, I shall only note one corollary of the Liapunov theorem especially important for thestatistical practice <strong>and</strong>, in particular, for justifying the method of sampling: For anydistribution of the values of some main {parent} population, the arithmetic mean of thesevalues, when the number of observations is sufficiently large, always obeys the Gauss law.The investigation of sums of dependent variables, an example of which I have consideredabove, presents special difficulties. However, in this field rather considerable findings hadalso been already obtained. In particular, they allow to explain why most of the curves ofdistribution of indications occurring in more or less uniform biological populations, asalready noticed by Quetelet, obey in the first approximation the Gauss law. By similarmethods {?} it became also possible to substantiate mathematically the theory of normalcorrelation whose main formulas were indicated by Bravais <strong>and</strong> applied by Galton forstudying the phenomena of heredity. I shall not expound here the Galtonian statistical theoryof heredity which Pearson developed later in detail. Its essence consists in his law ofhereditary regression according to which normal correlation exists between the sizes of somequantitatively measured indication in parents <strong>and</strong> offspring. At present, owing to theexperiments connected with the Mendelian theory, it should be considered as experimentallyestablished that the Galtonian theory is not as universal as Pearson, who based his opinion onhis numerous statistical observations, thought it was.However, the abovementioned mathematical investigations enable us to prove that, even ifthe Mendelian law is not the sole regulator of the inheritance of elementary indications, theGaltonian law of hereditary regression must be applicable to all the complicated indications(for example, to the stature of man) made up of a large number of elementary ones. The sametheorems explain why Pearson <strong>and</strong> his students could have also statistically revealed, inmany cases, the existence of normal correlation between the sizes of various organs inindividuals of one <strong>and</strong> the same race. The investigations also show that both the Gaussiannormal curve <strong>and</strong> the normal correlation are only the limiting cases of some generaltheoretical patterns so that the actually observed more or less considerable deviations fromthem are quite natural.[10] Thus we approach a new cycle of problems in the theory of probability whichcomprises the theories of distribution <strong>and</strong> of the general non-normal correlation. From thepractical viewpoint the Pearsonian British school is occupying the most considerable place inthis field. Pearson fulfilled an enormous work in managing statistics; he also has great
theoretical merits, especially since he introduced a large number of new concepts <strong>and</strong> openedup practically important paths of scientific research. The justification <strong>and</strong> the criticism of hisideas is one of the central problems of the current mathematical statistics. Charlier <strong>and</strong>Chuprov, for example, achieved considerable success here whereas many other statisticiansare continuing Pearson’s practical work definitively lousing touch with probability theory;uncritically applying his formulas, they are replacing science by technique of calculation.The purely theoretical problem of analytically expressing any statistical curve, just as anyproblem in interpolation, can always be solved, <strong>and</strong> by infinitely many methods. And, owingto the more or less considerable discrepancies allowed by the theory of probability, it is quitepossible, even when only having a small number of arbitrary parameters at our disposal, toobtain a satisfactory theoretical curve. Experience shows that in many cases this can beachieved by applying the Pearsonian curves which depend on four parameters; theoretically,however, in the sense of the corresponding stochastic pattern, these are only justified whenthe deviation from the normal curve is small. It would be interesting therefore to discover thecause of the conformity for those cases in which it actually exists given a large number ofobservations (Bernstein 1926).On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Bruns’ theory supplemented by Charlier that introduces aperturbational factor into the Gauss or the Poisson function provides a theoretical possibilityfor interpolating any statistical curve. However, for a curve considerably deviating from thenormal curve, a large number of parameters can be necessary, <strong>and</strong>, moreover, in this case thetheoretical meaning of the perturbational factor becomes unclear. Thus, excluding curvesapproaching in shape the Gauss curve, or the Poisson curve 12 , interpolation of statisticaldistributions is of an empirical nature <strong>and</strong> provides little help in underst<strong>and</strong>ing the essence<strong>and</strong> regularities of the phenomena considered.Of a certain interest is therefore the rarely applied method suggested by Fechner 13 <strong>and</strong>employed later by Kapteyn <strong>and</strong> some other authors. It consists in that, by an appropriatechange of the variable, the given statistical curve is transformed into a normal curve. Indeed,we have seen that very diverse patterns of the theory of probability lead to the normaldistribution so that it is natural to expect, <strong>and</strong> especially in biology, that in many cases whenthe measured variable does not obey the Gauss law, it can in one or another way be expressedas a function of one (or of a few) normal r<strong>and</strong>om variable(s). Without restricting our effortsto mechanical interpolation, but groping for, <strong>and</strong> empirically checking theoretical schemescorresponding to the statistical curves {I omit here a barely underst<strong>and</strong>able phrase}, weshould attempt to come gradually to an integral theory of the studied phenomena. In thisconnection, molecular physics is very instructive <strong>and</strong> it should serve as a specimen fortheoretical constructions in other branches of statistics.[11] The main causes simplifying the solution of the formulated problems in physics are,first, the hardly restricted possibility of experimentation under precisely determinedconditions 14 . The second favorable circumstance is the enormous number of elements,molecules or electrons, with which physics is dealing. The law of large numbers, whenapplied to bodies of usual size, – that is, to tremendous statistical populations, – thus leads tothose absolutely constant regularities which until recently were being regarded as the onlypossible forms of the laws of nature. Only after physicists had managed to studyexperimentally such phenomena where comparatively small populations of molecules orelectrons were participating, as for example the Brownian motion, <strong>and</strong> to ascertain that thedeviations foreseen by probability theory actually take place, the statement that physicalbodies were statistical populations of some uniform elements was turned from a hypothesisinto an obvious fact.In addition, most complete are the studies of those phenomena of statistical physics thathave a stationary nature. In other branches of theoretical statistics as well we should therefore
- Page 4 and 5: [3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7: successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9: classes of independent facts whose
- Page 12 and 13: examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15: 12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17: generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19: one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21: is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29: charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47: with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61:
influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63:
P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65:
4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67:
are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69:
described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71:
conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73:
Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75:
Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77:
Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79:
2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81:
Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83:
52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85:
Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87:
Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89:
30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91:
22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93:
10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95:
Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97:
In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99:
to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101:
In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103:
as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105:
1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107:
Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109:
determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111:
for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113:
Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115:
Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117:
Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119:
7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov