conditional variance <strong>and</strong> determined various correlation invariants. For the normallydistributed n-dimensional r<strong>and</strong>om vector the normal law is completely defined by the vectorof the expectation <strong>and</strong> the tensor of variance. Obukhov’s proposition on the canonicalexpansion of the correlation density that he proved reduces the study of multidimensionalvectorial correlations to the case of one-dimensional vectors.Romanovsky [21] studied various problems concerned with the connection of qualitativeindications (the theory of association).When determining the number <strong>and</strong> the size of the samples needed for establishing themean value of some quantitative indication distributed over a certain area (for example, ofthe harvest, or the content of metal in ore), we have to allow for correlation between differentpoints of the area. Boiarsky [3] made an interesting attempt to isolate continuous isotropicr<strong>and</strong>om fields of the Markov type <strong>and</strong> Obukhov [5] obtained more general results.Romanovsky [21], Nemchinov [1], Mitropolsky [2; 3; 4] <strong>and</strong> Lagunov [1] studied problemsconnected with the determination of the equations of regression.2. Distribution of Sample <strong>Statistics</strong>. Estimating the Parameters of theLaws of DistributionThe problems of sampling, that is, of the methods of approximately determining variouscharacteristics of the general population given the empirical material, can be very diversedepending on the nature of the theoretical law of distribution <strong>and</strong> the organization of theobservations. A rational choice of such functions of the observations (the choice of statistics,as Fisher called them) which provide, under given conditions, the best (in a certain sense)approximation of (information on) the estimated theoretical magnitudes (for example, of/onthe parameters of the law of distribution) is a complicated problem. The precision of theapproximation can be estimated in full if the law of distribution of the sample statistic isknown. In this case, it is also possible to evaluate the greater or lesser suitability of thechosen statistic as compared with other possible functions to serve as an approximatemeasure of the estimated parameter. The investigation of the laws of distribution of thevarious kinds of empirical means (means, variances, correlation coefficients, etc) is thereforeone of the most important problems of mathematical statistics. Those mostly studied,naturally occurred to be samples from normal populations, <strong>and</strong> many contributions ofEnglish <strong>and</strong> American statisticians headed by Fisher were devoted to this subject. Thepossibility of entirely describing the normal distribution by a small number of parameters <strong>and</strong>the comparative simplicity of calculations clear the way for a deep analysis of the variousrelations between the general population <strong>and</strong> the sample that represents it.Prominent <strong>and</strong> universally recognized achievements in this domain are due toRomanovsky. Issuing from the notions of the British school, his writings [8; 10; 11; 13; 18;19; 21] nevertheless advantageously differ since they are based on rigorous methodologicallines <strong>and</strong> are free from a rather considerable jumble of the main assumptions; indeed, heovercame the confusion of empirical <strong>and</strong> stochastic elements so characteristic of the Englishstatisticians. With considerable analytic mastery Romanovsky applies the method ofgenerating functions which leads to peculiar inversion problems in the theory of integralequations of the first kind.He was the first to derive rigorously the laws of distribution of the well-known Student –Fisher t- <strong>and</strong> z-criteria, of empirical coefficients of regression <strong>and</strong> of a number of otherstatistics. A summary of his main results can be found in his well-known treatise [37] thatplayed a fundamental part in the heightening of the mathematical level of the statisticalthought.Kuznetsov [2] studied the distributions of the length <strong>and</strong> the argument of a radius vectorby the normal distribution of its components. Kuzmin [2] investigated the asymptotic
ehavior of the law of distribution of the empirical correlation coefficient (derived byFisher). Smirnov [10] discovered the distribution of the maximal deviation (normed by theempirical variance) of observations from their empirical mean. This enabled him to makemore precise the well-known Chauvenet rule for rejecting outliers 1 .Smirnov [2; 6] studied the terms of the variational series, i.e., of the observed values of ar<strong>and</strong>om variable arranged in order of ascending magnitude, <strong>and</strong> established the appropriatelimit laws under rather general assumptions. Gnedenko [15; 23] obtained interesting resultsabout the distribution of the extreme terms of such series. There are three <strong>and</strong> only threelimiting distributions of these terms (Fisher & Tippett <strong>and</strong> Mises); for the maximal term theseare (x) = 0 if x ≤ 0 <strong>and</strong> = exp (– x – ) otherwise; (x) = exp [– (– x) ] if x ≤ 0 <strong>and</strong> = 1 otherwise, > 0;(x) = exp (– e –x ), |x| < + .By very subtle methods Gnedenko ascertained necessary <strong>and</strong> sufficient conditions for theoccurrence of each of these <strong>and</strong> delimited in full the domains of their attraction. The works ofGumbel show that this theory finds applications in hydrological calculations (volumes ofreservoirs), investigations of extreme age brackets, civil engineering, etc. Making use ofGnedenko’s method, Smirnov, in a not yet published paper, presents an exhaustive to acertain extent classification of the limit laws for the central terms of the variational series <strong>and</strong>of the domains of their attraction.Problems connected with a rational construction of statistics most effectively estimatingthe parameters of a theoretical law of distribution for a given size of the sample are urgent formodern science. Here, the classical approach, when the estimated parameter is considered asa r<strong>and</strong>om variable with some prior distribution is in most cases fruitless <strong>and</strong> the veryassumption that a prior distribution exits is often unjustified. Fisher <strong>and</strong> Neyman put forwarda new broad concept. It sees the main problem of the statistical method in establishingsubstantiated rules aiming at selecting hypotheses compatible with the observed data fromamong those admissible in the given concrete area of research. These rules should, first, besufficiently reliable, so that, when used regularly, they would practically seldom lead tomistaken results; <strong>and</strong>, second, they should be the most effective, so that, after accounting forthe observational data, their use would narrow the set of admissible hypotheses as much aspossible. The measure of the good quality of a statistical rule is the confidence coeffcientdefined as the lower bound of the probabilities of a correct conclusion resulting from the rule.Fisher <strong>and</strong> Neyman developed methods that allow, when only issuing from the sample data(without introducing prior probabilities), to indicate confidence boundaries that correspondto the assumed confidence coefficient <strong>and</strong> cover the estimated parameter of the generalpopulation. The revision of the already established methodology <strong>and</strong> the development of newideas is the main channel of modern scientific work for those engaged in this domain.Kolmogorov [43] presented an original interpretation of these ideas which specifies somesubtle logical points as applied to the simplest problem of estimating the parameters of theGauss law by a restricted number of observations. Bernstein [37] indicated the difficultiesconnected with Fisher’s concept which restrict the applicability of his methods by conditionsjustified within the boundaries of the classical theorems. In the final analysis, the estimationof the efficiency of statistical rules is inseparable from an accurate notion of the aim of thestatistical inmvestigation. The peculiarity of the logical situation <strong>and</strong> the uncommonness ofthe introduced concepts led to a number of mistaken interpretations (Fisher himself was alsoguilty here), but the fruitfulness of the new way is obvious. For our science, the furtherdevelopment of the appropriate problems is therefore an urgent necessity. Romanovky [44]<strong>and</strong> Brodovitsky [2] described <strong>and</strong> worked out a number of pertinent problems. Again
- Page 4 and 5:
[3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7:
successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9:
classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11:
distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13:
examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15:
12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17:
generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19:
one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21: is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29: charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47: with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63: P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65: 4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67: are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69: described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 72 and 73: Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75: Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77: Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79: 2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81: Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83: 52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85: Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87: Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89: 30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91: 22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93: 10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95: Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97: In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99: to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101: In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103: as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105: 1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107: Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109: determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111: for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113: Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115: Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117: Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119: 7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov