11.07.2015 Views

7. Probability and Statistics Soviet Essays - Sheynin, Oscar

7. Probability and Statistics Soviet Essays - Sheynin, Oscar

7. Probability and Statistics Soviet Essays - Sheynin, Oscar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP ij (t–1) p kj (t) , t > 1. (4.1.1)Especially important is the time-homogeneous case p ij (t) = p ij . Here, the matrix (P ij (t) ) is equal tomatrix (p ij ) raised to the power of t.A natural question of the limiting behavior of the probabilities P ij (t) as t ¤ ¥presents itself. In case of a finite number of states <strong>and</strong> time-homogeneity Markov proved that whenall the p ij were positive there existed limitslim P ij (t) = P j as t ¤ ¥ (4.1.2)which did not depend on the initial state E 1 . Beginning with 1929, this result (Markov’s ergodictheorem) became the point of departure for a long cycle of works done by Romanovsky <strong>and</strong> a numberof foreign authors (Mises, Hadamard, Fréchet, et al). Romanovsky made use of algebraic methodsdating back not only to Markov but also to Frobenius whereas Mises initiated direct probabilitytheoreticmethods. Romanovsky, in his fundamental memoir [35], fully studied by algebraic methodsthe limiting behavior of the transition probabilities P ij (t) under conditions of time-homogeneity <strong>and</strong>finiteness of the number of states. An exhaustive exposition of the solution by means of a directmethod can be found in Bernstein’s treatise [41]. Kolmogorov [29] was able completely to ascertainby direct methods the limiting behavior of these probabilities under time-homogeneity for a countablenumber of states.Already Markov had studied non-homogeneous chains. For them, a natural generalization of therelation (4.1.2) islim |P ik (t) – P jk (t) | = 0 as t ¤ ¥ (4.1.3)which expresses the vanishing of the dependence of state E k after t steps (as t ¤ ¥ ) from the initialstate (E i or E j ). On related problems see Kolmogorov [22; 32] <strong>and</strong> Bernstein [41].Markov’s typical problem was the study of the sums of a sequence of r<strong>and</strong>om variables 1 , 2 , …, t ,… such that t takes value a j if, after t steps, the system, having initially been in state E i , finds itself instate E j . The sums t = 1 + 2 + … + tcan obviously be written down as t =ja j µ ij(t)where µ ij (t) is the number of times that the system finds itself in state E j during the first t steps giventhat its initial state was E i . Therefore, from the modern point of view, the main natural problem is thestudy of the limiting behavior of the r<strong>and</strong>om variables µ ij (t) as t ¤ ¥ .For the case of time-homogeneity, all the problems connected with the usual, <strong>and</strong> the strong law oflarge numbers are easily solved. Sarymsakov devoted his article [9] to the law of the iteratedlogarithm. The problem of the limiting laws of distribution are deeper. For a finite number n of statesthe main problem consists in studying the limiting behavior as t ¤ ¥ of probabilitiesQ i (t) (m 1 ; m 2 ; …; m n ) = P(µ i1 (t) = m 1 ; µ i2 (t) = m 2 ; …; µ in (t) = m n ).A number of authors have quite prepared a full solution of this problem; more precisely, theydiscovered the necessary <strong>and</strong> sufficient conditions for the applicability of the appropriate local limittheorem concerning the (n – 1)-dimensional Gauss law (indeed, m 1 + m 2 + …+ m n = n) <strong>and</strong> even for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!