P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP ij (t–1) p kj (t) , t > 1. (4.1.1)Especially important is the time-homogeneous case p ij (t) = p ij . Here, the matrix (P ij (t) ) is equal tomatrix (p ij ) raised to the power of t.A natural question of the limiting behavior of the probabilities P ij (t) as t ¤ ¥presents itself. In case of a finite number of states <strong>and</strong> time-homogeneity Markov proved that whenall the p ij were positive there existed limitslim P ij (t) = P j as t ¤ ¥ (4.1.2)which did not depend on the initial state E 1 . Beginning with 1929, this result (Markov’s ergodictheorem) became the point of departure for a long cycle of works done by Romanovsky <strong>and</strong> a numberof foreign authors (Mises, Hadamard, Fréchet, et al). Romanovsky made use of algebraic methodsdating back not only to Markov but also to Frobenius whereas Mises initiated direct probabilitytheoreticmethods. Romanovsky, in his fundamental memoir [35], fully studied by algebraic methodsthe limiting behavior of the transition probabilities P ij (t) under conditions of time-homogeneity <strong>and</strong>finiteness of the number of states. An exhaustive exposition of the solution by means of a directmethod can be found in Bernstein’s treatise [41]. Kolmogorov [29] was able completely to ascertainby direct methods the limiting behavior of these probabilities under time-homogeneity for a countablenumber of states.Already Markov had studied non-homogeneous chains. For them, a natural generalization of therelation (4.1.2) islim |P ik (t) – P jk (t) | = 0 as t ¤ ¥ (4.1.3)which expresses the vanishing of the dependence of state E k after t steps (as t ¤ ¥ ) from the initialstate (E i or E j ). On related problems see Kolmogorov [22; 32] <strong>and</strong> Bernstein [41].Markov’s typical problem was the study of the sums of a sequence of r<strong>and</strong>om variables 1 , 2 , …, t ,… such that t takes value a j if, after t steps, the system, having initially been in state E i , finds itself instate E j . The sums t = 1 + 2 + … + tcan obviously be written down as t =ja j µ ij(t)where µ ij (t) is the number of times that the system finds itself in state E j during the first t steps giventhat its initial state was E i . Therefore, from the modern point of view, the main natural problem is thestudy of the limiting behavior of the r<strong>and</strong>om variables µ ij (t) as t ¤ ¥ .For the case of time-homogeneity, all the problems connected with the usual, <strong>and</strong> the strong law oflarge numbers are easily solved. Sarymsakov devoted his article [9] to the law of the iteratedlogarithm. The problem of the limiting laws of distribution are deeper. For a finite number n of statesthe main problem consists in studying the limiting behavior as t ¤ ¥ of probabilitiesQ i (t) (m 1 ; m 2 ; …; m n ) = P(µ i1 (t) = m 1 ; µ i2 (t) = m 2 ; …; µ in (t) = m n ).A number of authors have quite prepared a full solution of this problem; more precisely, theydiscovered the necessary <strong>and</strong> sufficient conditions for the applicability of the appropriate local limittheorem concerning the (n – 1)-dimensional Gauss law (indeed, m 1 + m 2 + …+ m n = n) <strong>and</strong> even for
an exhausting study of special cases. However, definite <strong>and</strong> simple formulations of such results, fromwhich would have inevitably followed the local <strong>and</strong> integral one-dimensional limit theorems for thesums t , are still lacking (see the works of Romanovsky <strong>and</strong> Sarymsakov, but, above all,Romanovsky [35]).For Markov <strong>and</strong> Bernstein, the case of non-homogeneity with respect to time served as a subjectfor a subtle study of the boundaries of the applicability of the classical limit theorem for sequences ofdependent r<strong>and</strong>om variables. They especially investigated the case of two states <strong>and</strong> a matrix p p( t )11( t )21pp( t )12( t )22reducible to a unit matrix. If, asymptotically, p 12 (t) c/n , p 21 (t) c"/n , then the limit theorem isapplicable for < 1/3; generally, however, this is not the case anymore when ≥ 1/3 (Bernstein [11];[18]).4.2. General Markov Processes. The main results of the theory of Markov chains essentiallydepend on assuming the absence of aftereffect. When keeping to this restriction, but going over to anarbitrary phase space = {} of possible states <strong>and</strong> ab<strong>and</strong>oning the dem<strong>and</strong> that the values of time tbe integers, we shall arrive at the concept of general Markov process governed by the probabilitiesP(t 1 ; t 2 ; ; ) of transition from state to the set of states ⊆ during time interval (t 1 ; t 2 ). For anyt 1 < t 2 < t 3 these probabilities obey the Smoluchowski equation 6P(t 1 ; t 3 ; 0 ; ) = ΩP(t 2 ; t 3 ; ; ) P(t 1 ; t 2 ; 0 ; d). (4.2.1)Kolmogorov [10] developed the general theory of Markov processes <strong>and</strong> offered their classification.The special cases, important for applications, can be isolated on various ways:1) The cases in which the phase space is a finite or a countable set (as it was for Markov chains)or a differentiable n-dimensional manifold, etc are considered separately.2) The case of discrete or continuous change of time t is studied.3) The case of time-homogeneity in which the transition probabilities P(t 1 ; t 2 ; ; ) only depend onthe time difference (t 2 – t 1 ) is isolated.4) The dem<strong>and</strong> that the change of (t) with time is continuous is included; or, on the contrary, thenumber of moments when one state is step-wisely changed to another one is restricted.5) Some differentiability is dem<strong>and</strong>ed on the distribution of probabilities P; the first suchrequirement is the condition that they be expressed through the corresponding densities of theprobabilities of transition.The emerging vast program is far from being fulfilled. Only some cases are studied in detail.4.2a. The set is finite, the time changes continuously, <strong>and</strong> the transition probabilities P aredifferentiable with respect to t 1 <strong>and</strong> t 2 . These probabilities are here obeying linear differentialequations which were made use of long before the general theory originated. For this case, the generaltheory is simpler, <strong>and</strong> leads to more simple <strong>and</strong> more polished formulations than the theory ofMarkov chains with discrete time does.4.2b. The case of a countable set of states also leads, under some restrictions, to systems of lineardifferential equations which, however, include here an infinite set of unknown functions.Nevertheless, these are being successfully solved in a number of instances taking place in applications.The case of branching processes where the matter can be reduced to a finite system of non-lineardifferential equations (Kolmogorov & Dmitriev [1]; Kolmogorov & Sevastianov [1]) had beenespecially studied. It covers important patterns of branching chain reactions.4.2c. Step-wise processes with any sets of states <strong>and</strong> continuous time were the subject of V.M.Dubrovsky’s numerous studies.
- Page 4 and 5:
[3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7:
successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9:
classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11:
distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13: examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15: 12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17: generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19: one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21: is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29: charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47: with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 64 and 65: 4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67: are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69: described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71: conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73: Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75: Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77: Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79: 2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81: Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83: 52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85: Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87: Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89: 30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91: 22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93: 10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95: Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97: In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99: to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101: In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103: as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105: 1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107: Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109: determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111: for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113:
Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115:
Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117:
Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119:
7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov