is inapplicable because the right side is indefinite. Nevertheless, I was able to determineP x=a (A) in the most general case although my definition seems to be too complicated. Inaddition, there exist many physical problems, where, properly speaking, only conditionalprobabilities are studied so that the reduction of all the applied conditional probabilities tosome definite system of unconditional probabilities is altogether impossible. Such, forexample, is the case of Brownian motion along an infinite straight line. Here, the conditionalprobabilities of the position of a particle x(t 2 ) at moment t 2 > t 1 are known if the position ofthe particle x(t 1 ) at moment t 1 is given. To reduce this problem to the pattern developed in mybook [1], it is necessary to choose some initial t 0 <strong>and</strong> to assume a correspondingunconditional (n + 1)-dimensional law of distribution of the variables x(t n ), x(t n–1 ), …, x(t 1 ),x(t 0 ) for any t n > t n–1 > … > t 2 > t 1 > t 0 . Knowing these unconditional (n + 1)-dimensionaldistributions, it will be possible to calculate, for any t 2 > t 1 > t 0 , the conditional law ofdistribution x(t 2 ) given a fixed x(t 1 ). Actually, however, the conditional laws of distribution ofthis last type are indeed initially given, <strong>and</strong>, for that matter, they are known for each pair t 2 >t 1 rather than only for t 1 > t 0 . An important problem therefore originates: To construct a directaxiomatics of conditional probabilities instead of determining them by issuing fromunconditional probabilities.Introductory Literature1. Kolmogoroff, A.N. (1933), Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeits-rechnung. Berlin.2. Hopf, E. (1934), On causality, statistics <strong>and</strong> probability. J. Math. Phys., vol. 13, pp. 51 –102.3. Lomnicki, Z., Ulam, S. (1934), Sur la théorie de la mesure. Fund. Math., Bd. 23, pp.237 – 278.1b. A full analogy between the notions of probability <strong>and</strong> measure of a set; between thedefinitions of expectation <strong>and</strong> the Lebesgue integral; <strong>and</strong> a partial analogy between theindependence of r<strong>and</strong>om variables <strong>and</strong> orthogonality of functions led to the possibility oftransferring the methods of the metric theory of functions of a real variable {to the theory ofprobability} <strong>and</strong> back. As the main result, the theory of probability gained a full solution ofthe problem concerning the conditions for the applicability of the law of large numbers tosequences of independent r<strong>and</strong>om variables <strong>and</strong> the creation of the concept of the strong lawof large numbers. Even for independent r<strong>and</strong>om variables no necessary <strong>and</strong> sufficientconditions, clear <strong>and</strong> convenient to any extent, were yet discovered for the applicability ofthe latter law.For a long time the Khinchin <strong>and</strong> Kolmogorov necessary <strong>and</strong> sufficient condition for theconvergence of a series of independent r<strong>and</strong>om variables was considered as being moreinteresting for applications in the theory of functions of a real variable. Recently, however, itwas established that this condition is of basic importance for the harmonic analysis ofr<strong>and</strong>om functions (Slutsky, Kolmogorov) <strong>and</strong> for studying r<strong>and</strong>om functions withindependent increments (Lévy).Bibliographic indications can be found in the last chapter of [1], see §1a.2a. The first systematically studied general pattern of a stochastic process was the schemeof Markov chains. Already Markov himself rather thoroughly developed the mathematicalside of their theory. However, only after the works of Hostinsky, Hadamard <strong>and</strong> Mises(1931) it became clear that these chains are the simplest <strong>and</strong> in many aspects typicalspecimens of arbitrary stochastic processes without aftereffect, – that is, of such processeswhere the knowledge of the state of the system x(t 0 ) at moment t 0 determines the law ofdistribution of the possible states x(t) of the system at moment t > t 0 irrespective of its statesat moments preceding t 0 .
Markov chains correspond to the case in which the states of a system are only consideredat integer values of t <strong>and</strong> the number of the possible states is finite. Here, all is reduced to theprobabilities P ik (t) of the transition from state i to state k during the interval of time betweenthe moments t <strong>and</strong> (t + 1). The more general probabilities P ik (s; t) of the same transitionbetween moments s <strong>and</strong> t > s are expressed through P ik (t). At present, a large number ofgeneralized Markov chains have been studied, <strong>and</strong> I discuss some of them in §3a. Thefollowing pattern covers all of them.Let E be the set of the possible states of the system, F, – the distribution function ofprobabilities in E. Then, for each interval of time from moment s to moment t > s there existsan operator H st (F) = F 1 by whose means we can determine the distribution function F 1 atmoment t given F at moment s. This operator is inevitably linear <strong>and</strong> unitary. In addition, itobeys the equationH su = H tu H st (1)for any s < t < u. Equation (1) is indeed the main equation of stochastic processes withoutaftereffect. For the case of Markov chains it takes the well-known formP ik (s; u) =jP jk (t; u)P ij (s; t).The general solution of equation (1) seems to be very difficult even for separate particularcases. The most important instance is the time-homogeneous case in which H st = H t–s <strong>and</strong> inwhich, accordingly, equation (1) becomesH s+t = H s H t . (1)Equation (1) shows that the matter indeed concerns the determination of the general formof a one-parameter group of unitary operations H t in the space of distribution functions F.The natural assumption that H t = e tU always leads to wide <strong>and</strong> important cases of solutions ofthe equation (1). It remains unknown whether a convenient method of forming a generalsolution, when the symbol U is understood in a sufficiently general sense, is possible.In addition to stochastic processes without aftereffect, another class of such processes withaftereffect but stationary (where all the distributions persist under the change from t to t = t+ a) was also deeply studied. Khinchin proved a profound theorem for stationary processesgeneralizing the Birkhoff ergodic proposition. Hardly anything is known about nonstationaryprocesses with aftereffect.Introductory literature1. Hostinsky, B. Méthodes générales du calcul des probabilités. Mém. Sci. Math., t. 52,1931, pp. 1 – 66.2. Kolmogoroff, A. Über die analytischen Methoden in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung.Math. Ann., Bd. 104, 1931, pp. 415 – 458.Further bibliographic indications are in3. Khintchine, A. Asymptotische Gesetze der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Berlin, 1933.2b. A systematic study of r<strong>and</strong>om functions is just beginning. It is certain, however, that adeeper theory of stochastic processes will be essentially based on the notions connected withr<strong>and</strong>om functions. Owing to the incompleteness of the axiomatics of probability theory,many investigations (Wiener, Slutsky) were restricted to considering the values of functionsat a finite number of points. In this case, even the formulation of the problem concerning theconditions of continuity, integrability, differentiability of a function, etc was impossible.
- Page 4 and 5: [3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7: successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9: classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11: distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13: examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15: 12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17: generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19: one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29: charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47: with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63: P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65: 4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67: are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69: described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71:
conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73:
Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75:
Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77:
Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79:
2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81:
Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83:
52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85:
Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87:
Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89:
30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91:
22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93:
10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95:
Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97:
In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99:
to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101:
In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103:
as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105:
1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107:
Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109:
determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111:
for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113:
Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115:
Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117:
Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119:
7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov