examine in the first place the curves of distribution corresponding to established conditionswhich regrettably do not occur often. A specimen of a stationary distribution most oftenencountered in statistical physics is the simple law of geometric progression, or the linearexponential law of the distribution of energy among uniform elements with one degree offreedom. The latter corresponds to a given total amount of energy possessed by the wholepopulation of the elements under consideration. The same exponential law also regulates theprocess of natural decay of the atoms of radioactive substances.A similar problem also corresponds to the economic issue of the stationary distribution ofwealth among the individuals of a given society. The law discovered here by Pareto canillustrate a methodologically correct approach to constructing the theoretical curves withwhich the appropriate curves of economic statistics should be compared when searching foran explanation of the deviations from these curves in the peculiarities of the social structure<strong>and</strong> in the dynamics {in the moving forces <strong>and</strong> trends} in the given society.I shall not dwell on the fundamental difference in stating the problem of the distribution ofenergy depending on whether we assume the Boltzmann hypothesis of continuity or thePlanck hypothesis of discontinuity. I only note that the latter leads to issues in finitecombinatorial analysis whereas the mathematical problem corresponding to the formerconsists in determining the most probable distribution of probabilities of a positive variablewith a given expectation; under some general assumptions the distribution sought isexponential. When dropping the condition of positivity but additionally assigning the valueof the expectation of the square, we arrive at the exponential function of the second degree,i.e., to the Maxwellian law of distribution of velocities to which the Gauss normal lawcorresponds.Generalizing this result further, we find that, under the same overall assumptions, the mostprobable curve corresponding to given moments of the first k orders is expressed by anexponential function with a polynomial of the k-th degree as its exponent. Therefore, if itoccurs that in some cases the method of moments applied in statistics is not only a technicaltrick applied for calculation, but that the moments of several lower orders are indeedsubstantially constant, then an exponential curve with an exponent of the correspondingpower should be regarded as a typical distribution of such a statistical population.A general mathematical theory of stationary statistical curves does not exist yet. Theirdetermination in some cases, as in the just considered instance, is reduced to a problem in thecalculus of variations, <strong>and</strong>, in other cases, to functional <strong>and</strong> integral equations. It is natural toapply the latter method {?} in biology where some law of heredity <strong>and</strong> selection plays thepart of an iterative function or operator determining the transformation of the curve ofdistribution of one generation into the curve of the next one. Inversely, issuing from thestatistical distribution of consecutive generations, it is possible to seek the simplest iterativelaws compatible with the given dynamical process. In particular, in this way it becamepossible to establish that the Mendelian law of heredity is almost the only such elementarylaw that, when selection is lacking, realizes stationary conditions beginning already with thesecond generation.[12] Finally, turning over to correlation theory, it should be indicated first of all, that,excluding biological applications, most of its practical usage is based on misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing.The desire to express all non-functional dependences through correlation is natural. However,no technical improvements replacing the hypothesis of normal correlation by any curvilinearcorrelation are attaining this goal since in probability theory the concept of correlation,according to its meaning, assumes stationarity which consists in that every variable involvedpossesses some fixed law of distribution.It is therefore senseless to consider, for example, the correlation between the amount of{paper} money in a country <strong>and</strong> the cost of a given product or the mean wholesale index. As
it seems to me, in such cases we should study some approximate functional dependencesbetween several magnitudes, x, y, z, <strong>and</strong> establish whether the hypothetical functionsconstructed on the basis of economic considerations are indeed sufficiently stable <strong>and</strong> littledepend on time or place. The role of the theory of probability in such matters is far fromsimple <strong>and</strong> its formulas should be applied with great care. When comparing dynamical series,the very concept of correlation should be replaced, as some authors do, by the termcovariation with a purely technical descriptive meaning attached to it. In any case, thenumerous studies concerning covariations are until now of a purely empirical nature <strong>and</strong> donot belong to the province of the theory of probability. In restricting the field of applicationof the correlation theory by more or less stationary populations, we lessen its practicalimportance; however, its conclusions in this {smaller} domain possess indisputable value<strong>and</strong> in some cases the correlation dependences express the same regularities as the functionaldependences.The need to complete my report which has already dragged on for an extremely long time,makes it impossible to dwell on purely mathematical <strong>and</strong> not yet fully solved problemsconnected with correlation theory. I hope that I was able to show that the methods ofprobability theory have now attained a sufficient degree of flexibility <strong>and</strong> perfection so as notto be afraid of most severe scientific criticism <strong>and</strong> to serve as a solid foundation for thefurther development of science. It should only be remembered that the concept of probabilityis a precise mathematical idea <strong>and</strong> that it should not be abused in the absence of strictpreconditions for its application. Because, as apparently Poincaré put it, the theory did notoffer us a wonderful gift of deriving something out of nothing 15 ; it only embodies adistinctive method of stating, combining <strong>and</strong> uniting our knowledge into an harmoniousmathematical system.Notes1. {Bernstein hardly had much knowledge of the (then not yet studied) history ofprobability. Thus, he did not mention De Moivre at all. And Bertr<strong>and</strong> (1888) had indeedseverely criticized the theory of probability, – not only in its Préface,– but in many cases hewas mistaken, see <strong>Sheynin</strong> (1994).}2. {Its application became necessary, above all, owing to Darwin’s Origin of Species.}3. {This statement seems too optimistic: the Kolmogorov axiomatics was yet to appear (in1933).}4. I think that it is unnecessary to repeat that, owing to the generally accepted continuity ofspace, the values of the angles are supposed here to be physically measured rather thanabsolutely precise <strong>and</strong> determined arithmetically.5. {The Editors inserted here a reference to the Russian translation of Borel (1914).}6. {Bernstein did not mention Mises.}<strong>7.</strong> {Possibly Marbe (1899).}8. {The reader will encounter this coefficient time <strong>and</strong> time again. Bernstein also devotedmuch attention to it much later, in his treatise (1946) but in either case he did not mentionthat Markov <strong>and</strong> Chuprov had all but rejected the coefficient of dispersion as a reliable tool.See <strong>Sheynin</strong> (1996, §§14.3 – 14.5).}9. {Boris Sergeevich Yastremsky (1877 – 1962). See Yastremsky (1964) <strong>and</strong> Anonymous(1962).}10. {The second reference is perhaps to Poincaré’s remark (1912, p. 171) that he borrowedfrom G. Lippmann to the effect that experimenters believe that the normal law is amathematical theorem whereas the latter think that it is an experimental fact.}11. {On Liapunov’s alleged use of the discontinuity factor see his note (1901).}
- Page 4 and 5: [3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7: successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9: classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11: distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 14 and 15: 12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17: generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19: one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21: is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29: charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47: with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63:
P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65:
4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67:
are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69:
described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71:
conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73:
Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75:
Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77:
Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79:
2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81:
Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83:
52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85:
Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87:
Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89:
30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91:
22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93:
10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95:
Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97:
In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99:
to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101:
In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103:
as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105:
1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107:
Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109:
determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111:
for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113:
Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115:
Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117:
Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119:
7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov