generality, the similarities taking place between the main notions of the theory of probability<strong>and</strong> the problem of metrization. Work in this direction is continuing. Kolmogorov’s yetunpublished research promises to advance considerably our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the limitingstochastic regularities.3. During these years, the estimation of the probabilities connected with an infinitelycontinued series of trials acquired both an essential theoretical importance <strong>and</strong> a considerablepractical interest. The Italian, <strong>and</strong> the Moscow mathematical schools, independently of oneanother, advanced the so-called strong law of large numbers as one of the general <strong>and</strong> mainlaws of probability theory, which Borel discovered in the simplest cases already long ago.However, whereas the Italians (Cantelli) did not go further than its formulation, we haveminutely worked out both its connection with the usual law of large numbers <strong>and</strong> theconditions for its applicability (Khinchin). We were also the first to discover the law ofiterated logarithm that determined, in a certain sense, the precise upper bound of thedeviations of sums of large numbers of r<strong>and</strong>om variables from their expectations (Khinchin);<strong>and</strong> to establish that it has a very wide field of applications (Kolmogorov). These issues arerecently attracting considerable attention of the European (mostly French <strong>and</strong> Italian)scientists.4. The investigation of more subtle limiting regularities under the conditions of theclassical Bernoulli pattern, <strong>and</strong> especially the study of the behavior of the distributionfunction at large distances from the center, which are also of a considerable practical interest,had mostly been developed during these years in the <strong>Soviet</strong> Union. We derived here anumber of findings exhausting the posed problems (Smirov. Khinchin).5. During the last years, after some interruption, the interest towards the simplest case of aseries of dependent r<strong>and</strong>om variables known as a Markov chains has again strengthened. Thefirst pertinent works had appeared abroad (Hadamard; Hostinsky), but they also met with arapid response in our country <strong>and</strong> were supplemented (Romanovsky) <strong>and</strong> considerablygeneralized (Kolmogorov). Important investigations on the applicability of the limitingtheorem to Markov chains (Bernstein) constitute a separate entity.6. Kolmogorov extended the theory of Markov chains to the continual case thus convertingit into a general theory of stochastic processes. This is one of the most remarkableachievements of <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematics in general. The new theory covers any process wherethe instantaneous state of a system uniquely determines the probability of any of its states atany subsequent moment irrespective of its previous history. Mathematically speaking, thistheory establishes for the first time the general principles connecting the problems ofstochastic processes with differential equations of definite types. Kolmogorov especiallyconsidered processes where the distribution function of the increment of the r<strong>and</strong>om variableremained constant, independent either of time or of the value of the variable at a givenmoment. He derived the general analytical form of such processes. Parallel investigationsabroad were only carried out in Italy (Finetti) where some particular results were attained.<strong>7.</strong> Along with Markov chains attention during the latest years was attracted to stationaryseries of r<strong>and</strong>om variables, that is, to series in which all the terms have the same expectation<strong>and</strong> the same variance <strong>and</strong> the correlation coeffi-cient between two terms only depends ontheir mutual location in the series.In some aspects, these series, of essential importance for various applications, present anextension of Markov chains. <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematicians have developed their theory (which,however, is yet far from being completed). In the first instance, we derived series whose
terms are connected by a recurrent linear relation which takes place with a high probability.These terms are therefore situated in the vicinity of certain sinusoids (or of combinations ofsuch curves) which constitutes the limiting sinusoidal law <strong>and</strong> very interesting models ofsuch series were constructed (Slutsky, Romanovsky). Khinchin recently proved that eachstationary series obeys the law of large numbers <strong>and</strong> this fact certainly considerablystrengthened the interest in them. Gelfond <strong>and</strong> Khinchin, in yet unpublished contributions,studied the properties of the Gram determinants for stationary series.8. The interest in the so-called congestion problems, that is, in stochastic investigationsconnected with the running of generally used plants, essentially increased mostly inconnection with the development of automatic telephony. By now, these studies resulted inthe creation of a special theoretical chapter of the doctrine of probability, <strong>and</strong> we aretherefore mentioning them here. The Moscow school (Kolmogorov, Khinchin) published anumber of pertinent writings which theoretically solved sufficiently general problems.[9] Finally, we ought to say a few words about some isolated works. In spite of theirapplied nature, it is difficult to pass over in silence Bernstein’s remarkable investigations ofheredity possessing considerable theoretical interest {contradiction!}. Kolmogorov recentlysolved a number of separate, <strong>and</strong>, again, theoretically important related problems. He alsostudied the general forms of mean values satisfying definite natural dem<strong>and</strong>s. His workoccasioned essential response from foreign scientific circles.We are now concluding our essay, <strong>and</strong> we repeat that it is very incomplete. We did notgive their due to all the works mentioned, but we still hope that we have attained our mainaim by showing that <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematics, in spite of the tenfold efforts exerted by ourEuropean comrades in competition, is firmly holding that banner of championship inprobability theory which the pre-revolutionary Russian science had already deserved.Notes1. {The civil war ended in 1920 <strong>and</strong> scarcely any serious work had begun until then, oreven until several years later.}2. {The official term was Great October [new style: November 7] Socialist Revolution.Contrary to Russian grammatical rules, all four words were capitalized.}3. A.N. Kolmogorov. On Some Modern Currents in the Theory of <strong>Probability</strong> 1934. (Proc. Second All-UnionMathematical Conference 1934), vol. 1. Leningrad – Moscow, 1935, pp. 349 – 358[Introduction] The first, classical period in the development of the theory of probabilityessentially ended with the investigations of Laplace <strong>and</strong> Poisson. Then, the theory wasmostly engaged in the calculation of the probabilities of various combinations of a finitenumber of r<strong>and</strong>om events. Entirely in accord with the problems studied, its mathematicaltools were mainly combinatorial analysis, difference equations, <strong>and</strong>, when solving these, themethod of generating functions.Owing to their fundamental research, Chebyshev, Markov <strong>and</strong> Liapunov initiated a newdirection. During that {new} period the concept of r<strong>and</strong>om variable occupied the centralposition. New analytic machinery for studying these variables, substantially based on thenotion of expectations, on the theory of moments <strong>and</strong> distribution functions was created. Themain objects of examination were sums of an increasing (but always finite) number ofr<strong>and</strong>om variables, at first independent, <strong>and</strong> later dependent. Mises (1919) developed acomplete theory of n-dimensional distribution functions for n r<strong>and</strong>om variables depending
- Page 4 and 5: [3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7: successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9: classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11: distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13: examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15: 12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 18 and 19: one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21: is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29: charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47: with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63: P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65: 4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67:
are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69:
described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71:
conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73:
Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75:
Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77:
Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79:
2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81:
Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83:
52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85:
Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87:
Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89:
30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91:
22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93:
10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95:
Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97:
In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99:
to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101:
In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103:
as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105:
1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107:
Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109:
determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111:
for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113:
Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115:
Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117:
Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119:
7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov