charged with making the leading plenary report on the theory of probability. All thisdescribes the forms of contacts <strong>and</strong> influences of which the pre-revolutionary mathematicianswere completely deprived.Bernstein’s predecessors were almost exclusively examining sums of independent r<strong>and</strong>omvariables thus continuing the traditions of the classics of probability theory 5 . However,practice poses problems that very often dem<strong>and</strong> the study of series of r<strong>and</strong>om variables ratherconsiderably depending one on another. In most cases this dependence is the stronger thenearer in the given series are the considered variables to each other; on the contrary, variablessituated far apart occur to be independent or almost so (meteorological factors,chronologically ordered market prices). Bernstein was the first who successfully attempted togeneralize the main principles of probability theory to these cases as well. His remarkabletheorem on the law of large numbers extends its action to all series of dependent terms wherethe correlation (the measure of dependence) between the terms of the series unboundedlydecreases with an infinite increase in the distance between them. His deep investigationsdevoted to the limit theorem showed that it also, under very wide assumptions, can begeneralized to series of dependent r<strong>and</strong>om variables. He also was the first to formulate <strong>and</strong>solve the problem about many-dimensional generalizations of the limit theorem which is of afundamental importance for mathematical physics (theory of diffusion, Brownian motion).Along with effectively <strong>and</strong> fittingly continuing the most glorious work done before theRevolution, the <strong>Soviet</strong> period brought about many essentially new points concerning both thesubstance of the issues under development <strong>and</strong> the forms of scientific work. Here, the mostsignificant example is the scientific school created within Moscow University, a collective ofresearchers whose like the probability theory in pre-revolutionary Russia could not haveknown. It possesses its own style, its scientific traditions, its rising generation; at the sametime, it enjoys quite a deserved reputation as one of the leading <strong>and</strong> most advanced schools inthe world. There is no important region of probability theory in whose development theMoscow school had not participated actively <strong>and</strong> influentially. It had initiated <strong>and</strong> attainedthe first achievements in a large number of modern issues whereas foreign scientists onlyjoined in their investigations later.[4] Let me attempt now to shed as much light as it is possible for an author of a paper notaddressed to specialists, on the main achievements of the Moscow school. Until the very lastyears, the theory of probability only studied infinite patterns that were sequences of r<strong>and</strong>omvariables. Most often we imagined such sequences as series of consecutive values of one <strong>and</strong>the same r<strong>and</strong>omly changing (for example, with time) magnitude (consecutive readings on athermometer; consecutive positions of a particle experiencing Brownian motion). However,for suchlike patterns a direct study of a variable continuously changing with time; anexamination of a continuous interchange, of a continuous series of values where the changeoccurring between any two moments of time is subject to the action of chance, rather than ofa sequence, would better conform to reality.We thus arrive at the idea of a stochastic (a r<strong>and</strong>om) process where consecutiveinterchange is replaced by a continuous current conditioned by r<strong>and</strong>omness. The sameproblems that occupied the theory of probability when studying sequences of r<strong>and</strong>omvariables arise here, for these stochastic processes; <strong>and</strong>, in addition, a number of essentiallynew issues crop up. Along with direct theoretical interest, these stochastic processes are veryimportant for a number of applied fields (mathematical physics). However, it was difficult tocreate mathematical tools which would enable to cover them. In 1912 the French scientistBachelier had attempted to accomplish this 6 , but he did not succeed, <strong>and</strong> only in 1930Kolmogorov discovered a method based on the theory of differential equations whichensured an analytical formulation of the main problems arising in the theory of stochasticprocesses. From then onward, this theory has been actively developing <strong>and</strong> today it is one of
the most urgent chapters of probability, rich in results <strong>and</strong> problems. Along with the Moscowschool, a number of foreign mathematicians, with whom we have been in constant contact,were participating in the pertinent work.During the last decades, the theory of probability encountered extremely diverse limitingprocesses. It is about time for a mature mathematical science {such as probability} to sort outthis variety, to establish the connections <strong>and</strong> interrelations between these limiting formations.Only in 1936 the French scientist Fréchet systematically explicated this topology of r<strong>and</strong>omvariables in a complete form that dem<strong>and</strong>ed a half of a lengthy treatise. However, as herepeatedly indicated, the founder of the theory, who had first developed it considerably, wasthe Moscow mathematician Slutsky. He also played a substantial part in working out thetheory of stochastic processes (above); he highly successively studied the application of themain analytic operations (integration, differentiation, expansion into Fourier series, etc) onr<strong>and</strong>om variables <strong>and</strong> often connected his investigations with problems arising in appliednatural sciences.One of the objects initially studied by Markov but then pretty well forgotten was the seriesof r<strong>and</strong>om variables now usually called Markov chains. These are sequences of mutuallydependent r<strong>and</strong>om variables connected by an especially simple dependence when the law ofdistribution of any of them is completely defined (in the most simple case) by the value ofthe immediately preceding variable so that the influence of the earlier history is eliminated.Markov rather considerably developed the study of such chains but after his death his resultswere forgotten whereas foreign scientists probably never heard of them at all. This happenedpartly because of the abovementioned causes, <strong>and</strong> partly because scientists in those dayswere yet unable to connect these theoretical investigations with current issues in naturalsciences or practice. In 1928, when the need to study such chains became necessary forvarious reasons, <strong>and</strong> when their possibilities for applications were clearly outlined, they werediscovered for the second time. Foreign scientists, believing that they were turning up virginsoil, proved a number of his findings anew. From then onwards, the theory of Markov chainsbecame, <strong>and</strong> is remaining one of the most intensively developing chapters of the theory ofprobability. The Moscow school, mainly in the person of Kolmogorov, actively <strong>and</strong> verysuccessively participated in this work. I ought to add right here, that one of our outst<strong>and</strong>ingspecialists, Romanovsky (Tashkent), who does not belong to the Moscow school, was <strong>and</strong> isalso energetically taking part here, so that the total contribution of the <strong>Soviet</strong> science to thecreation of this theory that originated in Russia seems very considerable.Then, the Moscow school initiated <strong>and</strong> attained the main achievements in developing asphere of issues directly adjoining the classical epoch of probability theory. It was knownlong ago that in the most important instances the deviation of the arithmetic mean of a longseries of independent r<strong>and</strong>om variables from its expectation obey the normal law <strong>and</strong> that, inparticular, the value of such a deviation is therefore, in a sense, <strong>and</strong> to a certain extent,bounded, but until recently the problem of determining the exact boundaries for thesedeviations did not arise even for the most elementary cases. In 1924, Khinchin firstformulated <strong>and</strong> solved this problem for the Bernoulli trials; then, after he, somewhat later,had extended this solution (now known as the law of the iterated logarithm) to some moregeneral cases, Kolmogorov showed that it persisted under considerably more generalassumptions. In 1932 Khinchin extended this result to continuous stochastic processes. Thensome foreign scientists (Lévy, Cantelli) refined the solution provided by the law of theiterated logarithm, but its most precise formulation, at least for r<strong>and</strong>om continuous processes,was again discovered in Moscow by Petrovsky by means of a remarkable method coveringmany various problems of the modern probability theory, see below.If a magnitude changing under r<strong>and</strong>om influences is shown as a point moving along astraight line, on a plane, or in space, we will have a picture of a r<strong>and</strong>om motion, or walk of apoint. Many most urgent issues of theoretical physics (problems of diffusion, Brownian
- Page 4 and 5: [3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7: successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9: classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11: distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13: examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15: 12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17: generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19: one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21: is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47: with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63: P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65: 4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67: are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69: described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71: conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73: Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75: Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77: Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79:
2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81:
Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83:
52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85:
Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87:
Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89:
30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91:
22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93:
10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95:
Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97:
In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99:
to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101:
In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103:
as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105:
1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107:
Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109:
determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111:
for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113:
Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115:
Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117:
Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119:
7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov