2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobachevsky’s work in the theory of probability. Istoriko-Matematich. Issledovania, vol. 2, pp. 129 – 136. (R)3. Ondar, Kh.O., Editor (1977, in Russian), The Correspondence between A.A. Markov<strong>and</strong> A.A. Chuprov. New York, 1981.4. Pólia, G. (1920), Über den zentralen Grenzwertsatz der Wahrschein-lichkeitsrechnungund das Momentproblem. Math. Z., Bd. 8, pp. 171 – 181.5. <strong>Sheynin</strong>, O. (1973), Finite r<strong>and</strong>om sums. Arch. Hist. Ex. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 275 – 305.6. --- (1990, in Russian), Chuprov. Göttingen, 1996.<strong>7.</strong> --- (1994), Chebyshev’s lectures on the theory of probability. Arch. Hist. Ex. Sci., vol.46, pp. 321 – 340.<strong>7.</strong> B.V. Gnedenko, A.N. Kolmogorov. Theory of probabilityUchenye Zapiski Moskovsk. Gosudarstven. Univ., No. 91, 1947, pp. 53 – 64[Introduction]The history of probability theory may be tentatively separated into four portions of time.[…]{The authors repeat here, almost word for word, Kolmogorov’s previous account of 1947also translated in this book.} The fourth period of the development of the theory begins inRussia with the works of Bernstein. […]The activities of the Moscow probability-theoretic school began somewhat later. It isnatural to consider that it originated with Khinchin’s works on the law of the iteratedlogarithm (in 1924) <strong>and</strong> Slutsky’s paper of 1925 on stochastic asymptotes <strong>and</strong> limits. Thedirection created by Bernstein along with the works of the Moscow school are stilldetermining the development of the <strong>Soviet</strong> probability theory. A number of new directionshave, however, appeared; the theory is successfully cultivated in an ever increasing numberof mathematical centers (Moscow, Leningrad, Tashkent, Kiev, Kharkov, etc), <strong>and</strong> the worksof the various directions become woven together ever more tightly 1 .Since the theory of probability has numerous diverse applications, scientific work oftentransforms here into solving separate <strong>and</strong> very special problems, sometimes dem<strong>and</strong>ingmasterly mathematical technique but introducing little innovation into the development of itsgeneral dominating ideas. Following the Chebyshev traditions, <strong>Soviet</strong> specialists alwaysattempted to isolate the main probability-theoretic patterns, deserving deep <strong>and</strong> exhaustivestudy out of this mess of separate applied problems. The limit theorems for sums ofindependent terms; Markov chains; general Markov processes; r<strong>and</strong>om functions <strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omvector fields having distributions invariant with respect to some transformation group, – allthese classical or newer general subjects studied by <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematicians had originated asa result of thoroughly reasoning out the reduction of a large number of separate problemsfrom most diverse fields of natural sciences <strong>and</strong> technology to typical theoretical patterns.A simple formal classification is not at all sufficient for discovering these main theoreticalpatterns. Often only hard work on isolated problems makes it possible to reveal the fruitfulgeneral concept that enables to approach all of them by a single method. It is naturaltherefore that, at each stage of the development of science, which gradually appears out of amultitude of particular problems put forward for study from most various quarters, only apart of them is taken over by some established section of the general theory, whereas thesolution of a large number of problems is left to the devices of isolated amateurish methods.Such isolated problems should not at all be considered with contempt, especially if theirapplied importance is great. However, their solution could have only been included in ageneral review of the achievements of <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematicians during thirty years by listingthe titles of the appropriate contributions. We have therefore preferred to focus all ourattention on a small number of main directions, each of these being united by a sufficientlyclear dominating idea.
Smirnov elucidates the application of probability to mathematical statistics in a companionarticle {also translated below}. Applications to statistical physics would have been worthy ofa special paper since the appropriate problems are specific; we only treat some of them.1.Sums of Independent TermsChebyshev’s <strong>and</strong> Liapunov’s main research was almost entirely concentrated on studyingthe behavior of sums of a large number of such independent r<strong>and</strong>om variables that theinfluence of each of them on their sum was negligible. More special investigations connectedwith sequences of independent trials, which constituted the chief object of attention for JakobBernoulli, Laplace <strong>and</strong> Poisson, are reducible to studying such sums. This problem is of mainimportance for the probability-theoretic substantiation of the statistical methods of research(the sampling theory) <strong>and</strong> of the {Laplacean} theory of errors; the interest in it is thereforequite well founded.In addition, as it usually happens in the history of mathematics, this problem, that occupiedmost considerable efforts of the scholars of the highest caliber belonging to the precedinggeneration, became important as a touch-stone for verifying the power of new methods ofresearch. When only the laws of distribution of separate sums are involved, the method ofcharacteristic functions proved to be the most powerful. It gradually swallowed up theclassical Russian method of moments <strong>and</strong> superseded the direct methods which the newMoscow school had borrowed from the theory of functions of a real variable. Elementarydirect methods of the Moscow school are still providing the most for problems in which anestimation of the probabilities of events depending on many sums is needed. In future, thesemethods will possibly be replaced by the method of stochastic differential or integrodifferentialequations.1.1. The Law of Large Numbers. A sequence of r<strong>and</strong>om variables 1 , 2 , …, n , …is called stable if there exists such a sequence of constants C 1 , C 2 , …, C n , … that, for any >0,lim P(| n – C n | > ) = 0 as n . (1.1.1)Practically this means that, as n increases, the dependence of the variables n on r<strong>and</strong>omnessbecomes negligible. If n have finite expectations E n = A n , it will be the most natural tochoose these as the constants C n . We shall therefore say that the sequence of n with finiteexpectations A n is normally stable if, for any > 0,lim P(| n – A n | > ) = 0 as n . (1.1.2)When stating that the sequence n obeys the law of large numbers, we mean that it is stable.Classical contributions always had to do with normal stability but in many cases it is morelogical <strong>and</strong> easier to consider stability in its general sense. If the variables n have finitevariances B n = var n = E( n –E n ) 2 the relationlim B n = 0 as n (1.1.3)
- Page 4 and 5: [3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7: successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9: classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11: distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13: examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15: 12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17: generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19: one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21: is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29: charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47: with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63: P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65: 4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67: are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69: described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71: conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73: Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75: Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77: Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79: 2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81: Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83: 52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85: Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87: Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89: 30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91: 22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93: 10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95: Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97: In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99: to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101:
In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103:
as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105:
1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107:
Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109:
determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111:
for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113:
Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115:
Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117:
Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119:
7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov