securing against mistakes (A.N. Krylov’s expression) 1 . A.D. Ventsel described in his reporthow a certain part of the theory of conditional Markov processes can be constructed with duerigor.[4] The spectral theory of stationary stochastic processes whose rigorous foundation waslaid in our country by {the late} Khinchin, is being intensively developed. Here, specialattention, perhaps under the influence of Wiener’s ideas, is paid now to the attempts atcreating a spectral non-linear theory. This is indeed essential since the specialists in the fieldsof radio engineering, transmission of information, etc are inclined to apply spectral notionswhereas only the linear theory, absolutely inadequate for many practically importantapplications, is yet mathematically worked out for the continuous spectra typical for thestochastic processes.[5] In the area of information theory our scientists had to catch up with science abroad. Wemay assume that now this delay is made up for, <strong>and</strong> the works of Khinchin <strong>and</strong> of therepresentative of our younger generation, R.L. Dobrushin, have already occupied aprominent place in international science.By its nature, information is not an exclusively stochastic notion. The initial idea ofinformation as the number of binary symbols needed for isolating a certain object fromamong a finite number of objects has nothing in common with the theory of probability.Stochastic methods now only dominate the higher sections of the theory of information. It ispossible, however, that the relationship between the two theories will radically change. I donot want to dwell here on this viewpoint (I am personally ever more attracted to it) accordingto which these relations may be reversed as compared with the present situation so that notprobability theory will serve as a basis of the higher sections of the theory of information, butthe concepts of the latter will form the foundation of the former.[6] I only note the origin of the new branch of the theory of dynamic systems, i.e., of thegeneral theory of non-stochastic rigorously determinated processes where the ideas of thetheory of information (beginning with the informational idea of entropy) play the main part.Extensive analogies between dynamic systems possessing the property of intermixing withstochastic processes were understood long ago. Now, however, in the works which I hadbegun <strong>and</strong> which V.A. Rokhlin <strong>and</strong> especially Ya.G. Sinai have continued, these similaritieswere essentially deepened. In particular, Sinai proved, under broad assumptions, <strong>and</strong> forsome quite classical models (elastic balls in a box), the long-st<strong>and</strong>ing hypothesis on theasymptotically normal distribution of the sojourn periods for different sections of the phasespace. For classical dynamic systems, defined by vector fields on compact manifolds, the twoextreme instances, the almost-periodic case being studied by me <strong>and</strong> V.I. Arnold, <strong>and</strong> thecase of K-systems with intermixing, are apparently the main ones in some sense.[7] In mathematical statistics, in spite of many splendid investigations accomplished in theschools of N.V. Smirnov <strong>and</strong> Yu.V. Linnik, the work of <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematicians is yet farfrom being sufficient. As it seems, this situation is caused by the fact that the development ofmathematical statistics is closely connected with the experience of direct contact with actualstatistical material, whereas, for qualified <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematicians, such work with real datastill remains although not rare, yet incidental <strong>and</strong> somewhat casual. Linnik reported on hisremarkable accomplishments in solving difficult analytical problems appearing inmathematical statistics. Work on publishing mathematical tables required in statisticalpractice <strong>and</strong> on compiling a number of new tables is going on on a vast scale at the SteklovMathematical Institute under Smirnov <strong>and</strong> L.N. Bolshev 2 .
Some groups of mathematicians in Moscow, Leningrad <strong>and</strong> other cities are enthusiasticallyhelping scientists of other specialities in solving practical problems in biology, geology, etcby statistical methods. But I have already mentioned that this work is somewhat casual,uncoordinated <strong>and</strong> sometimes amateurish. At a future conference, our branch ought to payattention to the problem of organizing such work more rationally <strong>and</strong> wider.Notes1. {This is a paraphrase rather than a quotation from Krylov’s Foreword to Chebyshev’slectures on probability theory published in 1936; translation: Berlin, 2004.}2. {See Bolshev, L.N., Smirnov, N.V. (1968), ) (Tables of Mathematical <strong>Statistics</strong>). M.}15. B.V. Gnedenko. Theory of <strong>Probability</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mathematical <strong>Statistics</strong>. Introduction. In (History of National Mathematics), vol. 4/2.Editor, I.Z. Stokalo. Kiev, 1970, pp. 7 – 13 …Foreword by TranslatorThe following is a translation of the author’s Introduction to the chapter on probability<strong>and</strong> statistics from a monograph on <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematics during 1917 – 196<strong>7.</strong> The mainbody of that chapter written by other authors was devoted to limit theorems <strong>and</strong> the theoryof r<strong>and</strong>om processes. Concerning Lobachevsky whom Gnedenko mentioned see my Note3 to Kolmogorov’s paper of 1947 translated in this book.[1] In Russia, the first investigations pertaining to probability theory date back to thebeginning of the 19 th century when Lobachevsky, Ostrogradsky <strong>and</strong> Buniakovsky, ondifferent occasions, had to solve a number of particular problems. Lobachevsky attemptedto check by observations the geometric system that exercised dominion over the universe.Ostrogradsky examined some applied issues including acceptance inspection of goodsdelivered by providers. Buniakovsky also issued from the need to solve practical problems<strong>and</strong> he published a fundamental treatise (1846). This initial acquaintance with the theory ofprobability was a necessary <strong>and</strong> important period in developing an interest in this branchof mathematics in Russia.The formulation <strong>and</strong> solution of general problems in the theory, <strong>and</strong> its initial formationas a vast mathematical science, characterized by a specific formulation of issues playingthe main part in the entire domain of natural sciences, are connected with Chebyshev,Liapunov <strong>and</strong> Markov. By proving the law of large numbers {in a general setting}Chebyshev not only opened a general <strong>and</strong> important scientific regularity; he also providedan exceptionally simple <strong>and</strong> powerful method for the theory of probability <strong>and</strong> the entirefield of mathematics. Later Markov perceived that the Chebyshev method allowed toestablish {still} wider conditions for the applicability of the law of large numbers. Theestimation of the probability, that the deviations of arithmetic means of independentr<strong>and</strong>om variables from the {appropriate} constants will not exceed the boundaries givenbeforeh<strong>and</strong>, was a natural extension of investigating the conditions for the means toapproximate a sequence of these constants.By Chebyshev’s time the classical findings of De Moivre <strong>and</strong> Laplace concerning theBernoulli pattern were only generalized to sequences of independent trials with a variableprobability of success. However, the theory of observational errors insistently dem<strong>and</strong>edwider generalizations 1 . Laplace <strong>and</strong> Bessel surmised that, if the observational error was asum of a very large number of errors, each of them being small as compared with the sum
- Page 4 and 5:
[3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7:
successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9:
classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11:
distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13:
examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15:
12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17:
generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19:
one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21:
is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23:
Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25:
abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27:
last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29:
charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31:
motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33:
phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35:
Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37:
The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39:
automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41:
11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43:
period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45:
of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47:
with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49:
logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51:
2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53:
will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55:
nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57:
favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59:
and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61:
influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63:
P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65:
4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67:
are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69:
described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71:
conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73:
Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75:
Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77: Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79: 2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81: Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83: 52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85: Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87: Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89: 30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91: 22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93: 10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95: Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97: In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99: to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101: In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103: as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105: 1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107: Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109: determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111: for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113: Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115: Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117: Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119: 7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121: Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123: Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125: observations for its power with reg
- Page 128 and 129: of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131: In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov