Statistical problems in radio engineering concerned with revealing signals against thebackground of interferences <strong>and</strong> noise constituting a stochastic process gave rise to a vastliterature. The study of these <strong>and</strong> of many other problems caused by the requirements ofmodern technology (for example, by communication techniques as well as by problems inqueuing theory; in studies of microroughness on the surfaces of articles; in designingreservoirs, etc), leads to the statistics of stochastic processes. This is certainly one of the mosturgent <strong>and</strong> fruitful, but also of the most difficult areas of modern research. Until now, onlyseparate statistical problems connected with testing the most simple hypotheses for Markovprocesses are more or less thoroughly studied. Thus, tests are constructed for checkingsimple hypotheses about transition probabilities or for studying the order of complication{generalization?} of a chain for some alternative, etc.[3] The Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian mathematicians Gren<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong> Rosenblatt [7] studied a number ofstatistical problems originating when examining stationary processes; from among these theestimation of the spectral density of a series by means of periodograms should be mentionedin the first instance.The entire field of statistics of stochastic processes requires involved mathematical tools,<strong>and</strong> research often leads to results unexpected from the viewpoint of usual statistics ofindependent series of observations. Already Slutsky (1880 – 1948), the remarkable <strong>Soviet</strong>scholar, indicated this fact in his fundamental works devoted both to theoretical problems ofstudying stationary series with a discrete spectrum <strong>and</strong> especially in his investigations ofconcrete geophysical <strong>and</strong> geological issues.The main channel of studies stimulated by the requirements of physics <strong>and</strong> technologynowadays lies exactly in the field of statistics of stochastic processes. The following facttestifies that this field excites interest. In September 1960 a conference on the theory ofprobability, mathematical statistics <strong>and</strong> their applications, organized by the <strong>Soviet</strong> <strong>and</strong>Lithuanian academies of sciences <strong>and</strong> the Vilnius University, was held in Vilnius. And, fromamong 88 reports <strong>and</strong> communications read out there, 26 were devoted to the applications<strong>and</strong> to problems connected with stochastic processes of various types (for example, the studyof the roughness of the sea <strong>and</strong> the pitching {rolling? The author did not specify} of ships,design of spectral instruments, design <strong>and</strong> exploitation of power systems, issues incybernetics, etc).[4] Without attempting to offer any comprehensive idea about the entire variety of theways of development of the modern statistical theory <strong>and</strong> its numerous applications in thisnote, we restrict our attention in the sequel to considering one direction that took shapeduring the last decades <strong>and</strong> is known in science as non-parametric statistics. Over the lastyears, distribution-free or non-parametric methods of testing statistical hypotheses werebeing actively developed by <strong>Soviet</strong> <strong>and</strong> foreign scientists <strong>and</strong> today they constitute a sectionof the statistical theory peculiar in its subject-matter <strong>and</strong> the methods applied.The non-parametric treatment of the issues of hypotheses testing by sampling radicallydiffers from the appropriate classical formulations where it was invariably assumed that thelaws of distribution of the r<strong>and</strong>om variables under consideration belonged to some definitefamily of laws depending on a finite number of unknown parameters. Since the functionalnature of these laws was assumed to be known from the very beginning, the aims of statisticswere reduced to determining the most precise <strong>and</strong> reliable estimates of the parameters giventhe sample, <strong>and</strong> hypotheses under testing were formulated as some conditions which theunknown parameters had to obey. And the investigations carried out by the British Pearson –Fisher school assumed, often without due justification, strict normality of the r<strong>and</strong>omvariables, Such an assumption essentially simplified mathematical calculations.
Exactly in such a way were determined the various confidence limits estimating theparameters by sampling <strong>and</strong> the criteria for testing hypotheses now constituting the mainstatistical tool described in all pertinent courses.In our time, when statistical methods are being applied under conditions very unlike innature one to another, the assumptions of the classical parametric statistics are unable tocover all the field of issues that we encounter. In practice, examining the distributions ofr<strong>and</strong>om variables, we ought in many cases to restrict the problem only by very generalsuppositions (only assuming, for example, continuity, differentiability, etc). Tests orconfidence estimates determined by issuing from these general premises were indeeddesignated non-parametric which stressed their distinction from their counterparts in classicalstatistics.Practitioners have been applying some non-parametric methods for a long time. Thus, itwas known how to obtain confidence limits for the theoretical quantiles of an unknowndistribution function (under the sole assumption of continuity) given the terms of thevariational series; <strong>and</strong>, in particular, how to estimate the position of the theoretical median.The application of the coefficients of rank correlation <strong>and</strong> of various tests of r<strong>and</strong>omnessbased on the theory of runs were also known long ago.Already during the 1930s – 1940s <strong>Soviet</strong> mathematicians achieved considerably deeperfindings in the area of non-parametric statistics. Here, we only mention the remarkable test ofthe agreement between an empirical function of distribution F n (x) <strong>and</strong> the hypotheticallyadmitted theoretical law F(x). The appropriate theorem provides an asymptotic distribution ofthe criterionD n = sup|F n (x) – F(x)|whose complete theory is based on a theorem due to Kolmogorov. Only continuity of F(x) ishere dem<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> D obeys a universal law distribution independent of the type of F(x).Similar tests independent of the type of the theoretical distribution function were laterobtained in various forms <strong>and</strong> for various cases of testing hypotheses.[5] The new direction attracted the attention of many eminent mathematicians <strong>and</strong> is nowone of the most productive for the general development of statistical science. Theindependence from the kind of distribution enables to apply much more justifiably nonparametrictests in the most various situations. Such tests also possess a property veryimportant for applications: they allow the treatment of data admitting either no quantitativeexpression at all (although capable of being ordered by magnitude) or only a quantitativeestimate on a nominal scale. And the calculations dem<strong>and</strong>ed here are considerably simpler.True, the transition to non-parametric methods, especially for small samples, is connectedwith a rather essential loss of information <strong>and</strong> the efficiency of the new methods as comparedwith the classical methodology is sometimes low. However, the latest investigations (Pitman,Lehmann, Z. Birnbaum, Wolfowitz, van der Waerden, Smirnov, Chibisov <strong>and</strong> many others)show that there exist non-parametric tests which are hardly inferior in this respect to, <strong>and</strong>sometimes even better than optimal tests for certain alternatives.Comparative efficiency is understood here as the ratio of the sample sizes for which thecompared tests possess equal power for given alternatives (assuming of course that theirsignificance levels are also equal). Thus, the Wilcoxon test concerning the shift of thelocation parameter under normality has a limiting efficiency of e = 3/ 0.95 <strong>and</strong> is thushardly inferior to the well-known Student criterion. And it was shown that under the sameconditions the sequential non-parametric sign tests possesses a considerable advantage overthe Student criterion: its efficiency is 1.3. A special investigation revealed the followingimportant circumstance: supposing that the well-known classical 2 test dem<strong>and</strong>s n
- Page 4 and 5:
[3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7:
successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9:
classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11:
distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13:
examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15:
12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17:
generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19:
one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21:
is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23:
Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25:
abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27:
last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29:
charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31:
motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33:
phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35:
Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37:
The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39:
automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41:
11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43:
period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45:
of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47:
with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49:
logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51:
2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53:
will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55:
nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57:
favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59:
and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61:
influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63:
P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65:
4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67:
are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69:
described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71:
conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73: Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75: Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77: Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79: 2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81: Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83: 52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85: Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87: Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89: 30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91: 22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93: 10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95: Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97: In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99: to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101: In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103: as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105: 1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107: Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109: determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111: for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113: Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115: Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117: Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119: 7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121: Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 124 and 125: observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127: securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129: of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131: In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov