with probability approaching unity, becomes arbitrarily small as compared with the sums.The necessary <strong>and</strong> sufficient conditions under which such convergence takes place were alsodiscovered. It turned out, that, in addition to the normal law appropriate for the classical limittheorems, all the other stable laws, found by the French mathematician Lévy, can also appear,whereas the entire class of admissible laws coincides with the so-called infinitely divisiblelaws whose study was begun by the Italian de Finetti.A large part of the further work done by the Moscow school was connected with theconcept of r<strong>and</strong>om processes (for the time being, in its classical, non-quantumunderst<strong>and</strong>ing). Two large fields were here studied:4) The theory of processes without aftereffect. Being a direct generalization of Markovchains, they are therefore called Markov processes. For them, the probabilities of transitionF(x; E; s; t) from state x at moment s to one of the states belonging to set E at moment t areconnected by the so-called equation of Smoluchowski or Chapman 12 .5) The theory of stationary r<strong>and</strong>om processes with their spectral theory.Kolmogorov originated the first of these directions. He discovered that, under some wideconditions <strong>and</strong> given transition probabilities, the non-linear Smoluchowski integral equationinvariably leads to some linear partial differential equation called after Fokker <strong>and</strong> Planck 13 .Still wider are the conditions under which a variable Markov process depending on aparameter asymptotically approaches an ideal Markov process obeying the Fokker – Planckequations. In such relations we perceive now the common root of all the limit theorems of theLaplacean <strong>and</strong> Liapunov type. Only from this point of view the fact that the classical functionof the normal density of probability(x; D) = (1/2 πD) exp(– x 2 /2D)is the solution of the equation of heat conduction∂ϕ∂=∂ ϕ ∂2 2/ D 2 / xceased to appear accidental.Mathematicians of the Moscow school (including, in particular, Petrovsky) <strong>and</strong> Bernsteinare studying this new vast field, termed theory of stochastic differential equations, thatopened up here. Most works of the Moscow school assume that the considered states of thesystem are represented by points of some compact part of space whereas Bernstein examinedwith special attention those new facts that appear when this restriction is ab<strong>and</strong>oned. Hisgeneralization is all the more natural, since the special case of the classical limit theoremsleading to the normal probability distribution should indeed be considered on the entirenumber axis, i.e., on a non-compact set 14 .I am unable to dwell as minutely on the spectral <strong>and</strong> ergodic theories of stationary r<strong>and</strong>omprocesses created (as a general mathematical theory) by Khinchin. This direction of researchoccupies a prominent place in the work of other representatives of the Moscow school aswell <strong>and</strong> many foreign mathematicians cultivated it. The remarkable investigations onstatistical periodography independently started by Slutsky have also joined Khinchin’sdirection of work. In the field of statistics, the importance of all this research is widelyrecognized abroad. One of Slutsky’s main contributions was reprinted {translated intoEnglish} in Engl<strong>and</strong> on the initiative of the English statisticians. Wold’s book on stationarytime series published in Sweden was entirely based on the works of Khinchin, etc. For somereason the appreciation of the importance of the stochastic, statistical concept of oscillationswith a continuous spectrum for physics <strong>and</strong> mechanics, as insisted on by Wiener in asomewhat different form even before the appearance of the Moscow works, is established toa lesser degree. Here, the contributions of the Moscow school sometimes become known
only tardily. For example, Taylor, the celebrated specialist in the statistical theory ofturbulence, published in 1938 a work on the connection between the distribution of energyover the spectrum <strong>and</strong> the coefficient of correlation for various distances, a work thatcontained nothing except for a particular case of Khinchin’s formulas published in 1934. Asto <strong>Soviet</strong> mechanicians, they only came to know about these relations from Taylor’s work.Such cases are, however, becoming atypical. With regard to those mathematical circlesproper which are engaged in the theory of probability, the situation attained during the last 15years before the war {before 1941 – 1945} was such that <strong>Soviet</strong> works began enjoyingconsiderable response abroad almost immediately after publication. For our part, we alsopainstakingly follow everything going on in other countries. Studies in probability theory arevery intensive everywhere, <strong>and</strong> it is often difficult to isolate the achievements made byscientists of separate nations. For example, the Italian de Finetti had originated the theory ofthe so-called infinitely divisible laws of distribution, I have vastly widened it, <strong>and</strong> Khinchin<strong>and</strong> the Frenchman Lévy developed it in persistent competition. And Gnedenko <strong>and</strong> Doeblin,a young Austrian mathematician who emigrated to France, accomplished, with variablesuccess as to greater breadth <strong>and</strong> finality of the results obtained, an entire cycle ofinvestigations connected with the application of these laws to the limit theorems of theclassical type.In wartime, intensive work abroad in the theory of probability was going on almostexclusively in the USA 15 , where not only American, but likely the best European scientificspecialists who fled from Germany, Italy <strong>and</strong> France, were concentrated. When examiningthe then arriving American scientific periodicals, it was possible to see how intensively <strong>and</strong>successfully they developed, in particular, the directions that originated here. For example,we have first perceived the importance of studying r<strong>and</strong>om functions, <strong>and</strong> Slutsky <strong>and</strong>Kolmogorov made the first relevant steps, but nowadays the most exhaustive works on thissubject belong to Americans. To retain their place in this competition after the war, <strong>Soviet</strong>specialists in probability theory will undoubtedly have to work very intensively.<strong>7.</strong> The modern period in the development of mathematical statistics began with thefundamental works of English statisticians (K. Pearson, Student, Fisher) that appeared in the1910s, 1920s <strong>and</strong> 1930s. Only in the contributions of the English school did the applicationof probability theory to statistics ceased to be a collection of separate isolated problems <strong>and</strong>became a general theory of statistical testing of stochastic hypotheses (i.e., of hypothesesabout laws of distribution) <strong>and</strong> of statistical estimation of parameters of these laws 16 .The first popularizer of this wide current in the <strong>Soviet</strong> Union was Romanovsky (Tashkent)who is also the author of important investigations in pure probability theory, – in Markovchains <strong>and</strong> other topics. In addition to his own interesting results achieved in the direction ofthe English school, Romanovsky published a vast course in mathematical statistics where hecollected with an exceptional completeness the new findings of this discipline most essentialfor applications.The Moscow school only introduced into mathematical statistics one new chapter naturallyfollowing from its theoretical investigations. With the exception of one isolated work due toMises, statisticians always assumed, when determining an unknown law of distribution byempirical data, that it belonged to some family depending on a finite number of parameters<strong>and</strong> reduced their problem to estimating these. Glivenko, Kolmogorov, <strong>and</strong> especiallySmirnov systematically developed direct methods of solving this problem, <strong>and</strong> of testing theapplicability of a certain law to a given series of observations. These methods are very simple<strong>and</strong> are gradually becoming customary.Indirectly, the Moscow contributions have also played an essential role in developingmathematical statistics in another sense. The investigations made by Fisher, the founder ofthe modern English mathematical statistics, were not irreproachable from the st<strong>and</strong>point of
- Page 4 and 5: [3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7: successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9: classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11: distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13: examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15: 12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17: generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19: one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21: is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23: Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25: abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27: last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29: charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31: motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33: phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35: Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37: The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39: automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41: 11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43: period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45: of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 48 and 49: logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53: will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55: nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63: P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65: 4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67: are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69: described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71: conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73: Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75: Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77: Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79: 2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81: Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83: 52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85: Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87: Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89: 30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91: 22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93: 10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95: Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97:
In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99:
to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101:
In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103:
as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105:
1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 106 and 107:
Smirnov, Romanovsky and others made
- Page 108 and 109:
determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111:
for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113:
Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115:
Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117:
Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119:
7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121:
Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123:
Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125:
observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127:
securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129:
of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131:
In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov