Smirnov, Romanovsky <strong>and</strong> others made a number of interesting investigations concerningthe estimation of statistical hypotheses. In §4 devoted to distribution-free methods we shalldescribe some studies of the tests of goodness-of-fit <strong>and</strong> homogeneity.3. The variational series is known to be the ordered sequence 1 (n) < 2 (n) < … < n (n) ofobservations of some r<strong>and</strong>om variable with continuous distribution F(x). Many scientistsexamined the regularities obeyed by the terms of a variational series. Already in 1935 <strong>and</strong>1937 Smirnov [3; 7] systematically studied its central terms. Gnedenko’s examination [17;25] of the limiting distributions for the maximal terms appeared somewhat later. Thesecontributions served as points of departure for further research.Smirnov [15] devoted a considerable study to the limiting distributions both for the central<strong>and</strong> the extreme terms with a constant rank number. A sequence of terms k (n) of a variationalseries is called central if k/n , 0 < < 1, as n . Magnitudes k (n) are called extremeterms of a variational series if either the subscript k, or the difference (n – k) are constant.Denote the distribution of k (n) by nk (x) <strong>and</strong> call (x) the limiting distribution of k (n) (k =Const), if, after adequately choosing the constants a n <strong>and</strong> b n , nk (a n x + b n ) (x) as n .The following Smirnov theorem describes the class of the limiting distributions. The properlimiting distributions for a sequence with a constant number k can only be of three types: (k) x(x) = [1/(k – 1)!] α (k) | x| (x) = [1/(k – 1)!] −α (k) e(x) = [1/(k – 1)!] x000e –x x k–1 dx, x, > 0;e –x x k–1 dx, x < 0, > 0; (1)e –x x k–1 dx, – < x < .Gnedenko earlier derived the limiting distributions for the minimal term; they can certainlybe obtained from (1) by taking k = 1. The conditions for attraction to each of these threelimiting distributions exactly coincide with those determined by Gnedenko [25] for the caseof the minimal (maximal) term.Smirnov established a number of interesting regularities for the central terms. We shallspeak about a normal -attraction if there exists such a distribution (x) that, if[(k/n) – ]n 0 as n <strong>and</strong> the constants a n <strong>and</strong> b n (which generally depend on ) are adequately chosen,P{[( k (n) – b n )/a n ] < x} (x) as n .The following four types exhaust the class of the limiting distributions having domains ofnormal -attraction: (1) (x) = (1/ (2) (x) = (1/αcx2 π ) −∞2 π ) − −∞αc|x|exp(– x 2 /2)dx, x ≥ 0, c, > 0; (1) (x) = 0 if y < 0;exp(– x 2 /2)dx, x < 0; (2) (x) = 1 if x, c, > 0;
(3) − αc1|x|2(1/ 2π) exp( −x/ 2) dx,x < 0;−∞(x) = αc2x2(1/2) + (1/ 2π) −> exp( x / 2) dx,x,c1,c2,α 0;0 4 (x) = (1/2) if – 1 < x ≤ 1 <strong>and</strong> = 1 if x > 1.;These domains are here indicated.Gartstein [1] examined the limiting distributions for the range n = n (n) – k (1) . In particular,she proved that the class of these distributions consists of laws of the following six types: (1) (x); (1) (x); (1) (x); (1) (x)* (1) (ax); (1) (x)* (1) (ax); (1) (x)* (1) (ax).The notation is here the same as in formulas (1). She [2] extended these results to the case ofan arbitrary extreme range (rank), i.e., to the difference rk(n)= n–k (n) – r (n) where r <strong>and</strong> (n –k) remained constant, as well as to mixed ranks when r (say) remained constant but k/n <strong>and</strong>, at the same time, [(k/n) – ]n t. In the first case the class of limiting distributionsconsisted of nine types, <strong>and</strong> in the second instance, of eleven types.Meisler [5 – 7] examined the maximal term of the variational series for independentobservations when the distributions depended on the number of the trial. Here is his mainfinding. The distribution (x) can be a limiting law for the maximal term of a series when<strong>and</strong> only when (with an adequate norming) either 1) For any > 0 there existed such a nondecreasingfunction (x) that the equality (x) = (x + ) (x) persisted for all values of x;or 2) For any (0 < < 1) there existed such a non-decreasing, continuous at point x = 0function (x) that the equality (x) = (x) (x) persisted for all values of x. Meisler [6]also studied the properties of the distributions of this class. Note that his theory developedparallel to the theory of the laws of class L in the limiting distributions for sums ofindependent terms 1 . And he [3] indicated conditions for attraction to the law (x) differingfrom those of Gnedenko [25]. His condition is {conditions are?} of a sufficiently definitivenature.Gnedenko [73] considered the distributions of the maximal term of a variational series in asomewhat different aspect. He indicated some interrelations between the limitingdistributions for sums of independent r<strong>and</strong>om variables <strong>and</strong> for the maximal summ<strong>and</strong>. Loeve(e.g., 1956) essentially developed these similarities.Finkelstein [1] examined the limiting distributions for the extreme terms of a variationalseries for a two-dimensional r<strong>and</strong>om variable. He [2; 3] also studied limiting distributions ofthe terms of a variational series for such r<strong>and</strong>om variables 1 , 2 , …, that for any a thesequence of events i < a <strong>and</strong> i ≥ a formed a homogeneous stationary Markov chain. Underthese conditions a theory generalizing the findings for independent trials is being developed.Note that the class of limiting distributions for the maximal term includes, in addition to thethree earlier discovered types, a fourth typeµ ,q (x) = qe –|x| for x < 0 <strong>and</strong> = 1 for x > 0.Here, q is constant <strong>and</strong> 0 < q < 1.4. It follows from the Bernoulli theorem that for a fixed x the empirical distributionfunction F N (x), constructed by drawing on N independent observations x 1 , x 2 , …, x N of somer<strong>and</strong>om variable , converges in probability to its distribution function F(x). The works ofGlivenko [13] <strong>and</strong> Kolmogorov [40] initiated deeper investigations. Glivenko proved that,with probability 1, the empirical distribution uniformly converges to F(x) <strong>and</strong> Kolmogorov
- Page 4 and 5:
[3] I bear in mind the well-known p
- Page 6 and 7:
successes of physical statistics. B
- Page 8 and 9:
classes of independent facts whose
- Page 10 and 11:
distribution is a corollary of the
- Page 12 and 13:
examine in the first place the curv
- Page 14 and 15:
12. According to Bortkiewicz’ ter
- Page 16 and 17:
generality, the similarities taking
- Page 18 and 19:
one on another, as well as the corr
- Page 20 and 21:
is inapplicable because the right s
- Page 22 and 23:
Instead, Slutsky introduced new not
- Page 24 and 25:
abandoned in August 1936, but it is
- Page 26 and 27:
last decades, mathematicians more o
- Page 28 and 29:
charged with making the leading ple
- Page 30 and 31:
motion and a number of others) are
- Page 32 and 33:
phenomena. It is self-evident that
- Page 34 and 35:
Such new demands were formulated in
- Page 36 and 37:
The addition of independent random
- Page 38 and 39:
automatic lathes, etc. Here, the ma
- Page 40 and 41:
11. Kolmogorov, A.N. Grundbegriffe
- Page 42 and 43:
period 1 and remained, until the ap
- Page 44 and 45:
of the analytical tool rather than
- Page 46 and 47:
with probability approaching unity,
- Page 48 and 49:
logic. The ensuing vagueness in his
- Page 50 and 51:
2. Gnedenko, B.V. (1949), On Lobach
- Page 52 and 53:
will be sufficient, although not ne
- Page 54 and 55:
nlimk = 1P(| k (n) - m k (n) | > H
- Page 56 and 57: favorite classical issue as the gam
- Page 58 and 59: and some quite definite (not depend
- Page 60 and 61: influenced by a construction that a
- Page 62 and 63: P ij (1) = p ij (1) , P ij (t) =kP
- Page 64 and 65: 4.2d. Bebutov [1; 2] as well as Kry
- Page 66 and 67: are yet no limit theorems correspon
- Page 68 and 69: described, from the viewpoint that
- Page 70 and 71: conditional variance and determined
- Page 72 and 73: Romanovsky [45] and Kolmogorov [46]
- Page 74 and 75: Let S be the general population wit
- Page 76 and 77: Part 1. Russian/Soviet AuthorsAmbar
- Page 78 and 79: 2. On necessary and sufficient cond
- Page 80 and 81: Gnedenko, B.V., Groshev, A.V. 1. On
- Page 82 and 83: 52. ( (Mathematical Principl
- Page 84 and 85: Kozuliaev, P.A. 1. Sur la répartit
- Page 86 and 87: Obukhov, A.M. 1. Normal correlation
- Page 88 and 89: 30. Généralisations d’un théor
- Page 90 and 91: 22. Alcune applicazioni dei coeffic
- Page 92 and 93: 10. A.N. Kolmogorov. The Theory of
- Page 94 and 95: Kuznetsov, Stratonovich & Tikhonov
- Page 96 and 97: In the homogeneous case H s t = H t
- Page 98 and 99: to such a generalization. He only s
- Page 100 and 101: In the particular case of a charact
- Page 102 and 103: as it is usual for the modern theor
- Page 104 and 105: 1. {The second reference to Pugache
- Page 108 and 109: determined the precise asymptotic c
- Page 110 and 111: for finite values of N, M and R 2 .
- Page 112 and 113: Mikhalevich’s findings by far exc
- Page 114 and 115: Uch. Zap. = Uchenye ZapiskiUkr = Uk
- Page 116 and 117: Khinchin, A.Ya. 43. Math. Ann. 101,
- Page 118 and 119: 7. DAN 115, 1957, 49 - 52.Pinsker,
- Page 120 and 121: Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A. (1952
- Page 122 and 123: Statistical problems in radio engin
- Page 124 and 125: observations for its power with reg
- Page 126 and 127: securing against mistakes (A.N. Kry
- Page 128 and 129: of the others, then its distributio
- Page 130 and 131: In Kiev, in the 1930s, N.M. Krylov