Guidance, Navigation, and Control Autonomy: Just as miniature applications have been(GN&C): those words epitomize enabled by modern electronics, autonomy is being enabled<strong>Draper</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong> and represent those by powerful yet inexpensive computers capable oftechnologies required to make systems performing the complex decision and control tasksperform such useful functions as fly to otherwise performed by human operators. Autonomousthe moon, launch satellites to system needs are being driven by economic and safetyprescribed orbits, accurately point satellite antennas, factors. Key applications include the Air Forceautonomously fly helicopters in surveillance missions, sailsubmarines autonomously in long-duration missions, orguide competent munitions accurately.Uninhabited Combat Aircraft (UCAV) and robust abortsfor reusable launch rockets. The successful developmentof autonomous systems will require a wide range oftechnologies. These new levels of autonomy are a naturalWe are proud to perform vital functions in theextension of our traditional GN&C role.development of these systems: concept development,The following six papers authored by the GN&C technicaltrade studies, requirements analyses, and algorithmstaff show the breadth and depth of our technical work:development to achieve GN&C functions for modernnaval and aerospace systems. We use advancedmathematical methods, modern computer tools, andhigh-fidelity simulations to develop our ideas, validateour designs, and support their implementation inchallenging first-of-the-kind applications.“An Integrated Safety Analysis Methodology for EmergingAir Transport Technologies,” by D. Allinger, G. Rosch, andJ. Kuchar (MIT) explains a reliability model analysis andsimulation tool that gives NASA, the FAA, and the airlineindustry one means to investigate a complex problemfacing our air traffic industry.Three trends are driving modern GN&C applications:C. D’Souza developed and evaluated a new guidance lawcomplexity, miniaturization, and autonomy.approach in his paper “An Optimal Guidance Law forComplexity: Complexity affects us in the increasingly large Planetary Landing.”number of design parameters and in what must be taken“A Control Lyapunov Function Approach to Robustinto account to achieve the demanding performanceStabilization of Nonlinear Systems,” by M. McConley, B.requirements of modern applications. For example, theAppleby, and M. Dahleh and E. Feron (MIT) describes aspace station attitude controller is made “complex” by thesystematic approach to generate a nonlinear control law,need to consider the high-order solar panel flex modedynamics.Complexity trends cause us to devise computer-basedmethods to develop suitable GN&C system designs.Indeed, we are able to develop complex systemssuccessfully because of the rapid advances in real-timecomputer technology.which gives locally optimal performance and is provablyrobust to bounded disturbances.“Relative and Differential GPS Data Transfer and ErrorAnalysis,” by R. Phillips explicitly defines high-performanceGPS measurement processing approaches, their performancecharacteristics, and their domain of applicability.<strong>Draper</strong> is performing fundamental research intoMiniaturization: Modern electronics and sensor methods for extracting image information and we aretechnologies enable complex functions to be achieved invery small packages. Today’s guidance systems are 10,000times smaller than those of 40 years ago—a trend that islikely to continue. Everyday, new applications becomeplausible and challenge our designers to model the uniquecharacteristics of these applications and devise innovativeways to solve specialized problems in areas such ascompetent munitions, personal navigators, hypervelocityapplying those methods to medical imaging as well asaerospace problems. “Segmentation of MR Images UsingCurve Evolution and Prior Information” by H. Pien, M.Desai, and J. Shah (Northeastern) illustrates oneapplication.“INS/GPS Technology Trends for Military Systems,” byG. Schmidt, Director of <strong>Draper</strong>’s Guidance TechnologyCenter, details the future of military navigation systemsvehicles, microsats, and biomedical instrumentation.Introductionapplications and their underlying drivers.
BiographyGeorge SchmidtGeorge Schmidt began his career at <strong>Draper</strong> in 1961 as a part-time undergraduate studentemployee, then became a research assistant, and finally a member of the technical staff in 1965. Heis currently Director of the Guidance Technology Center and Associate Director of Guidance,Navigation, and Control. His major activities have been in GN&C system design for missiles,aircraft, and manned spacecraft; Kalman filtering applications; and integration techniques for highresolutionsynthetic aperture radars, Global Positioning Systems (GPS), and inertial sensors. Since1968 he has served the NATO Advisory group for Aerospace Research and Development in manypositions, including as a U.S. member of the Guidance and Control Panel. He has participated inseveral U.S. Department of Defense committees, the two most recent being the DDR&E PrecisionStrike Architecture Study and the Defense Science Board Task Force on GPS. He has a facultyappointment as a Lecturer in Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT. He is a member of the AmericanInstitute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, andthe Institute of Navigation. He is an elected member of the Russian Federation, Academy of Navigation and Motion Control. Mr. Schmidt is anauthor or contributing author of more than 60 technical papers and reports, encyclopedia articles, and textbooks. He is the Editor-in-Chief of theAIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. He received SB and SM degrees in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Instituteof Technology and an ScD in Instrumentation also from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.e-mail: gschmidt@draper.comINS/GPS Technology Trends for Military Systems /Biography1
- Page 2 and 3:
Letter from thePresident and CEO,Vi
- Page 4 and 5: Information TechnologyMilton AdamsE
- Page 6 and 7: BiographyMilton Adams has been at D
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 1 represents a functional de
- Page 11 and 12: Programs. In effect, these controll
- Page 13 and 14: Although the terminal area traffic
- Page 15 and 16: Table 2. ATFM performance evaluatio
- Page 17 and 18: In the experiments, a nominal capac
- Page 19 and 20: [3] Wambsganss, Michael C. “Colla
- Page 21 and 22: Guidance, Navigation, and Control A
- Page 23 and 24: A Control Lyapunov FunctionApproach
- Page 25 and 26: x( 0) ∈ X and w(t) ∈Wfor all t
- Page 27 and 28: (b) Select a quadratic RCLF V i (x)
- Page 29 and 30: at each grid point. In the case w 1
- Page 31 and 32: References[1] Ball, J.A. and A.J. v
- Page 33 and 34: Guidance, Navigation, and Control A
- Page 35 and 36: Relative and Differential GPSData T
- Page 37 and 38: The first term on the right in the
- Page 39 and 40: H R# δρ R,GPS -H A# δρ A,GPSThi
- Page 41 and 42: selection; and (3) shown that the a
- Page 43 and 44: Guidance, Navigation, and Control A
- Page 45 and 46: Segmentation of MR ImagesUsing Curv
- Page 47 and 48: (3)where ν now represents a contin
- Page 49 and 50: Experimental ResultsThe results of
- Page 51 and 52: Table 1. A summary of segmentation
- Page 53: Guidance, Navigation,and ControlJim
- Page 57 and 58: clock and ephemeris errors, as well
- Page 59 and 60: maintained in a rigid structure, wh
- Page 61 and 62: Table 5. “Typical” absolute GPS
- Page 63 and 64: performed, then the target location
- Page 65 and 66: tightly-coupled system, however, ca
- Page 67 and 68: Concluding RemarksRecent progress i
- Page 69 and 70: As real-time systems evolve into th
- Page 71 and 72: Advanced Fault-TolerantComputing fo
- Page 73 and 74: The Viking and Voyager were both in
- Page 75 and 76: Containment Regions (FCRs). There a
- Page 77 and 78: well as reversing the whole process
- Page 79 and 80: As real-time systems evolve into th
- Page 81 and 82: Automated Station-Keepingfor Satell
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 2. Minimum elevation angles
- Page 85 and 86: anomaly M and/or the ascending node
- Page 87 and 88: However, since optimization and rec
- Page 89 and 90: is maintained in the Northern Hemis
- Page 91 and 92: autonomy. It must have the ability
- Page 93 and 94: [31] Neelon, Joseph G., Jr., Paul J
- Page 95 and 96: Draper’s primary goal is to Drape
- Page 97 and 98: )Rotordynamic Modelingof an Activel
- Page 99 and 100: Eq. (9) becomes:λ[ R ] { Φ } = [
- Page 101 and 102: chosen to be 24, for a total of 48
- Page 103 and 104: InertialInstruments/MechanicalDesig
- Page 105 and 106:
BiographyJeffrey Borenstein is curr
- Page 107 and 108:
process step. Process information i
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 4. Control chart for boron d
- Page 111 and 112:
References[1] Barbour, N., J. Conne
- Page 113 and 114:
Draper Laboratory continues to engi
- Page 115 and 116:
Validating the Validating Tool:Defi
- Page 117 and 118:
calculates miscellaneous terms, suc
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 1. Suggested specification sh
- Page 121 and 122:
User Accuracy as aFunction of Simul
- Page 123 and 124:
20-min averaging, this clock lockin
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 2. Sample high-level summary
- Page 127 and 128:
AcknowledgmentR.L. Greenspan, J.A.
- Page 129 and 130:
Systems IntegrationRich MartoranaPe
- Page 131 and 132:
BiographyAnthony Kourepenis is an A
- Page 133 and 134:
control is employed to maintain the
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 1. Summary of automotive yaw
- Page 137 and 138:
Resolution (60 Hz) deg/h10000000100
- Page 139 and 140:
References[1] Greiff, P., B. Boxenh
- Page 141 and 142:
Guidance, Navigation, and Control A
- Page 143 and 144:
An Integrated Safety AnalysisMethod
- Page 145 and 146:
Infrastructure ModelsSystemRequirem
- Page 147 and 148:
Figures 6 and 7 illustrate the bloc
- Page 149 and 150:
Notice that each flight track descr
- Page 151 and 152:
Table 7. Safety statistics at 1700-
- Page 153 and 154:
Guidance, Navigation, and Control A
- Page 155 and 156:
An Optimal Guidance Law forPlanetar
- Page 157 and 158:
Note that the states in the three d
- Page 159 and 160:
Crossrange (Kft)10090807060504030Cl
- Page 161 and 162:
The 1997 Charles StarkDraper PrizeT
- Page 163 and 164:
The 1997 Charles StarkDraper Prize1
- Page 165 and 166:
“Draper encourages its personnel
- Page 167 and 168:
Gimballed Vibrating GyroscopeHaving
- Page 169 and 170:
“Draper encourages its personnel
- Page 171 and 172:
Optical Source Isolator withPolariz
- Page 173 and 174:
“Draper encourages its personnel
- Page 175 and 176:
Hunting Suppressor forPolyphase Ele
- Page 177 and 178:
“Draper encourages its personnel
- Page 179 and 180:
Sensor Having an Off-Frequency Driv
- Page 181 and 182:
proof mass from transients and enha
- Page 183 and 184:
1997 Published PapersThe following
- Page 185 and 186:
monitoring of space structures and
- Page 187 and 188:
measured by kinematic degrees of fr
- Page 189 and 190:
i.e., what percent of the earth’s
- Page 191 and 192:
McConley, M. W.; Dahleh, M. A.; Fer
- Page 193 and 194:
unaffordable, or even misguided. Bu
- Page 195 and 196:
The Draper DistinguishedPerformance
- Page 197:
Educational Activitiesat Draper Lab