Adopted June 22, 2010Park Service AreasEvaluating service areas is an effective means of determining if the parks are welllocatedrelative to their users. While some communities have sufficient, or evenan abundance of parkland, the location of these opportunities plays a crucial rolein determining the effectiveness of the entire park system. This analysis allowsidentification of those areas of the community that have sufficient park areasavailable and, more importantly, those that are in need of parks and recreationareas and facilities in closer proximity to neighborhoods.Depicted in Map 2.2, Park Service Areas, are service area buffers around all existingparks. The service areas are shown separately to emphasize the difference in servicearea coverage based on the type of park. In some cases, such as the Superblock /Doug Lee Fields, parks are multi-use destinations, serving as both a communitypark and a neighborhood park for nearby residents.From a purely locational standpoint, the analysis indicates that, within the Citylimits, the developed areas of the eastern side of the community are fairly wellserved by the existing neighborhood parks system. On the west side, there is anavailability of community level parks that serve the local neighborhoods. However,some of the older neighborhoods near the City core and the fringes of the community,especially in the northwest, are deficient in park resources.<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>Findings of the service area analysis for each park type include:• Community parks have a primary service area of one mile, meaning that amajority of persons utilizing these area-wide parks generally reside within thisradius. As illustrated by Map 2.2, Park Service Areas, <strong>Carbondale</strong> currently hasfour community parks. While their associated service areas cover most of theCity limits, the central areas of the community have limited coverage. Sincethere is limited opportunity for creating a new community park in the nearDowntown neighborhoods, the community park needs might be met throughbetter access to the existing community parks. As future development takesplace in these areas, it will be important that commensurate trail and bikewayimprovements occur.• Illustrated in Map 2.2, Park Service Areas, are the one-half mile service areas ofthe four neighborhood parks, as well as the one-eighth mile service areas of thenatural areas maintained by Green Earth. The intent is to have well-distributedand evenly spaced neighborhood parks in close proximity to residential areas.As displayed, the current array of neighborhood parks provides good coveragein most places, with the exception of the original core of the City. However,under-served areas exist as pockets on the fringe areas of the City. For example,there is limited coverage along the spine of U.S. 51. Other areas currentlyunder served are located in the northwestern and far western portions of theCity. However, these areas are still sparsely developed and may not necessarilyneed additional neighborhood parks until more development occurs. As newresidential development occurs throughout the periphery of the City, there willbe a need for additional neighborhood parks to serve these new developments.• As shown in Map 2.2, Park Service Areas, natural areas have a limited servicearea of one-eighth mile, and, by nature, they serve the needs of people livingin their immediate vicinity. While these parks tend to benefit a relativelylimited population, they provide an additional form of recreation for nearbyresidents. These passive park areas complement the Park District’s more active2.13Land Use Character and Community Growth
Adopted June 22, 2010City of <strong>Carbondale</strong>INSERT TWO: THE PRINCIPLES OFSMART GROWTH INCLUDE:• Create a range of housing opportunitiesand choices• Create walkable neighborhoods• Encourage community and stakeholdercollaboration• Foster distinctive, attractive communitieswith a strong sense of place• Make development decisions predictable,fair and cost effective• Mix land uses• Preserve open space, farmland, naturalbeauty and critical environmental areas• Provide a variety of transportation choices• Strengthen and direct developmenttowards existing communities• Take advantage of compact buildingdesignSOURCE: SMART GROWTH ONLINErecreation holdings. Furthermore, these natural areasare an asset since Green Earth Inc. not only acquiresthe site for public use, but also assumes maintenanceresponsibilities for the site.• It should be noted that the University offers anumber of recreational opportunities that are opento the public but are not categorized as parks. Thewalking trail around Campus Lake is a majorrecreational attraction. While the Frisbee Golf course,Thompson Woods, and the Skate Park attract visitorsof all ages.Parks and recreation facilities serve a numberof purposes that relate to physical, social, andcommunity well-being. One of the hurdles tofulfilling park and recreational needs is balancingresources with demands. With a diverse populationthere is a wide variety of recreational resources thatthe community may utilize. These resources mayinclude everything from soccer and baseball fields,indoor and outdoor aquatic facilities, to communitygardens. The challenge for the <strong>Carbondale</strong> ParkDistrict is to concede to popular demand while alsoaccommodating specialized groups that otherwisecould not participate in that activity. The City shouldcontinue to facilitate a relationship with the ParkDistrict in order to achieve a strong park system andmeet the needs of its residents.2.4 <strong>Plan</strong> Focus Areas and StrategicRecommendationsThroughout the planning process, a number of issues and concerns wereexpressed related to land use compatibility, community growth, corridor designand appearance, Downtown and neighborhood redevelopment, and historicpreservation. These discussions formed the basis of the following focus areas, alongwith the analysis of existing conditions: review of current plans, ordinances, andpractices; and an examination of the planning and development process. Followingthe identification of the Focus Areas are a series of strategies and their rationales,along with the advisable implementation actions and initiatives. The areas of focusare as follows:Focus Area 2.1 - Managing Future Growth2.14The development form of the City and its 1.5 mile extraterritorial jurisdiction ismostly concentrated in each direction around the intersection of U.S. 51 and <strong>IL</strong>13. Over time, neighborhoods and supporting commercial districts have radiatedoutward from the original Town Square. Over the last two decades, the patternof land use has become increasingly fragmented, with both small and large-lotsubdivisions unfolding throughout the periphery of the extraterritorial planningChapter Two
- Page 1: Adopted June 22, 2010
- Page 4 and 5: Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 6 and 7: Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 8 and 9: Adopted June 22, 20101CommunityOver
- Page 10 and 11: Adopted June 22, 2010validates many
- Page 12 and 13: DemographicComparisonEducation% Pop
- Page 14 and 15: Adopted June 22, 2010will remain st
- Page 16 and 17: Adopted June 22, 2010factors for re
- Page 18 and 19: Adopted June 22, 2010strategies, in
- Page 20 and 21: Adopted June 22, 2010To facilitate
- Page 22 and 23: Adopted June 22, 2010A priority-set
- Page 24 and 25: Adopted June 22, 2010Infill Develop
- Page 26 and 27: Adopted June 22, 2010the community
- Page 28 and 29: 2Land Use CharacterAdopted June 22,
- Page 30 and 31: Adopted June 22, 2010• Strategy 3
- Page 32 and 33: Adopted June 22, 2010community char
- Page 34 and 35: Adopted June 22, 2010DesignationTab
- Page 36 and 37: Adopted June 22, 2010Summary of exi
- Page 38 and 39: Adopted June 22, 2010a priority (al
- Page 42 and 43: Adopted June 22, 2010area (see Map
- Page 44 and 45: Adopted June 22, 2010environmental
- Page 46 and 47: Adopted June 22, 2010as a valuable
- Page 48 and 49: Adopted June 22, 2010c. Improve acc
- Page 50 and 51: Adopted June 22, 2010District / Dev
- Page 52 and 53: Adopted June 22, 2010Actions and In
- Page 54 and 55: Adopted June 22, 2010The “communi
- Page 56 and 57: Adopted June 22, 2010Actions and In
- Page 58 and 59: Adopted June 22, 2010building place
- Page 60 and 61: Adopted June 22, 2010during the lat
- Page 62 and 63: Adopted June 22, 2010Plan. This dis
- Page 64 and 65: Adopted June 22, 2010monotony by re
- Page 66 and 67: Adopted June 22, 2010g. Amend the c
- Page 68 and 69: Adopted June 22, 2010effective in a
- Page 70 and 71: AIRPORT RDService2.2ParkAreasPARKS
- Page 72 and 73: COUNTRY CLUB RDS. OAKLAND AVEMurphy
- Page 75 and 76: Adopted June 22, 20103CommunityMobi
- Page 77 and 78: Adopted June 22, 20103.3 Existing C
- Page 79 and 80: Adopted June 22, 2010Existing Stree
- Page 81 and 82: Adopted June 22, 2010caused by turn
- Page 83 and 84: Adopted June 22, 2010secondary arte
- Page 85 and 86: Adopted June 22, 2010of traffic sig
- Page 87 and 88: Adopted June 22, 2010number and wid
- Page 89 and 90: Adopted June 22, 2010e. Coordinate
- Page 91 and 92:
Adopted June 22, 2010STREETSCAPE MA
- Page 93 and 94:
Adopted June 22, 2010c. Re-evaluate
- Page 95 and 96:
Adopted June 22, 2010streets’ imp
- Page 97 and 98:
Adopted June 22, 2010Downtown Carbo
- Page 99 and 100:
COUNTRY CLUB RDN. BILLY BRYAN STS.
- Page 101 and 102:
3.3SalukiExpress RoutesTRANSIT ROUT
- Page 103 and 104:
Adopted June 22, 20104Housing &Neig
- Page 105 and 106:
Adopted June 22, 2010Summary of Hou
- Page 107 and 108:
Adopted June 22, 2010the 1970’s.
- Page 109 and 110:
Adopted June 22, 2010Figure 4.3 | O
- Page 111 and 112:
Adopted June 22, 2010units. This su
- Page 113 and 114:
Adopted June 22, 2010poverty, conve
- Page 115 and 116:
Adopted June 22, 2010from increased
- Page 117 and 118:
Adopted June 22, 2010Rationale:In s
- Page 119 and 120:
Adopted June 22, 2010Strategy 2: Ut
- Page 121 and 122:
Adopted June 22, 2010building orien
- Page 123 and 124:
Adopted June 22, 2010Table 4.5Incom
- Page 125 and 126:
Adopted June 22, 2010including publ
- Page 127 and 128:
COUNTRY CLUB RDN. MARION STBig Mudd
- Page 129 and 130:
Big Muddy R.104.03Big Muddy R.Crab
- Page 131 and 132:
COUNTRY CLUB RDN. MARION STMurphysb
- Page 133 and 134:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 135 and 136:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 137 and 138:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 139 and 140:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 141 and 142:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 143 and 144:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 145 and 146:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 147 and 148:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 149 and 150:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 151 and 152:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 153 and 154:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 155 and 156:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 157 and 158:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 159 and 160:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 161 and 162:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 163 and 164:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 165 and 166:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon