Adopted June 22, 2010monotony by reason of equal lot sizes and identical setbacks) or, in many cases,undesirable variability.The character of the commercial districts is due to their design. For instance, retailuses including stores and restaurants are allowed downtown (Primary BusinessDistrict, BPR) and along Main Street near the mall (Secondary Business, SB),although both reflect a very different character (see Figure 2.14, Use and Character).Likewise, whether a building is located adjacent to or set back from the street, or hasmoderate or no open space and landscaping, a different character may be exhibited.Therefore, if the community desires to enhance its appearance and change itscharacter, a refocusing and restructuring of the zoning districts is necessary.The role of the natural environment and the use of open space in the design ofdevelopment are telling of the character. While the pattern – and even use or form– of development may change, its character may remain the same. This is to say,by way of example, that smaller lots that are surrounded by open space may becompatible and of the same character as larger lots (with less open space) by reasonof comparable densities and increased buffering and separation from abutting oradjacent developments. This is essentially the intent of the land use intensity systemfor planned developments (which may be greatly simplified and more effective).<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>Figure 2.14 | USE AND CHARACTERWhile the use is the same, their context and character are much different. Land usehas little influence on character, as exhibited by these photos.Through the course of the initial phase of public involvement, residents madeknown their views of the City and its character, as well as the designs of sites,buildings, and neighborhoods. They spoke of a lack of green space in development,preserving natural character, protecting environmental resources, Downtown andcommunity aesthetics, auto-centric design, and property maintenance, amongother references to their perspectives of the community. While these concerns mustbe balanced with those of economic development and property interests, this <strong>Plan</strong>and its implementation offer the opportunity to re-evaluate policies and practicesand make reasonable adjustments to the current approaches and standards.2.37Land Use Character and Community Growth
Adopted June 22, 2010City of <strong>Carbondale</strong>Strategy 1: Refocus the zoning ordinance to emphasize the character and formof development in appropriate zoning districts.RationaleThe City’s zoning ordinance includes many of the elements necessary to achievegood development outcomes. However, there are many opportunities to repurposeand recalibrate appropriate zoning districts to achieve the intended character ofdevelopment without placing as much emphasis on land use. While use shouldremain a secondary consideration, the form and design of development may bemore important if the City is to achieve enhanced character.Actions and Initiativesa. Revise the district purpose statements to define the intended character of thedistrict, rather than general use types.b. Recalibrate and consolidate, where possible, each of the existing districts. Revisethe dimensional standards to produce the intended character. For instance,many of the districts have the same setbacks although the use types anddensities are quite different. The dimensions should be changed accordingly.c. Review and revise the lists of permitted and special uses in each district. Includedevelopment and performance standards that relate to the district character.d. Adopt a housing palette that includes the dimensional standards for a varietyof housing types. As a by-right planned development option, allow mixedhousing types subject to district density restrictions and appropriate buffering.e. Replace the land use intensity system with applicable performance standardsin each district. The intent may be retained only with much simpler standardsthat achieve better quality outcomes.f. For the purpose of procedural streamlining and to better focus the appropriatelocations of uses, restrict the types and numbers of allowable special uses. Forthose uses with performance standards, make them a limited use whereby theyare conditionally permitted subject to the standards.Figure 2.15 | ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN CONCEPT2.38Multiple-family design standards provide certainty to the neighborhoodsince there are specific standards included in the zoning ordinance.Chapter Two
- Page 1:
Adopted June 22, 2010
- Page 4 and 5:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 6 and 7:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 8 and 9:
Adopted June 22, 20101CommunityOver
- Page 10 and 11:
Adopted June 22, 2010validates many
- Page 12 and 13:
DemographicComparisonEducation% Pop
- Page 14 and 15: Adopted June 22, 2010will remain st
- Page 16 and 17: Adopted June 22, 2010factors for re
- Page 18 and 19: Adopted June 22, 2010strategies, in
- Page 20 and 21: Adopted June 22, 2010To facilitate
- Page 22 and 23: Adopted June 22, 2010A priority-set
- Page 24 and 25: Adopted June 22, 2010Infill Develop
- Page 26 and 27: Adopted June 22, 2010the community
- Page 28 and 29: 2Land Use CharacterAdopted June 22,
- Page 30 and 31: Adopted June 22, 2010• Strategy 3
- Page 32 and 33: Adopted June 22, 2010community char
- Page 34 and 35: Adopted June 22, 2010DesignationTab
- Page 36 and 37: Adopted June 22, 2010Summary of exi
- Page 38 and 39: Adopted June 22, 2010a priority (al
- Page 40 and 41: Adopted June 22, 2010Park Service A
- Page 42 and 43: Adopted June 22, 2010area (see Map
- Page 44 and 45: Adopted June 22, 2010environmental
- Page 46 and 47: Adopted June 22, 2010as a valuable
- Page 48 and 49: Adopted June 22, 2010c. Improve acc
- Page 50 and 51: Adopted June 22, 2010District / Dev
- Page 52 and 53: Adopted June 22, 2010Actions and In
- Page 54 and 55: Adopted June 22, 2010The “communi
- Page 56 and 57: Adopted June 22, 2010Actions and In
- Page 58 and 59: Adopted June 22, 2010building place
- Page 60 and 61: Adopted June 22, 2010during the lat
- Page 62 and 63: Adopted June 22, 2010Plan. This dis
- Page 66 and 67: Adopted June 22, 2010g. Amend the c
- Page 68 and 69: Adopted June 22, 2010effective in a
- Page 70 and 71: AIRPORT RDService2.2ParkAreasPARKS
- Page 72 and 73: COUNTRY CLUB RDS. OAKLAND AVEMurphy
- Page 75 and 76: Adopted June 22, 20103CommunityMobi
- Page 77 and 78: Adopted June 22, 20103.3 Existing C
- Page 79 and 80: Adopted June 22, 2010Existing Stree
- Page 81 and 82: Adopted June 22, 2010caused by turn
- Page 83 and 84: Adopted June 22, 2010secondary arte
- Page 85 and 86: Adopted June 22, 2010of traffic sig
- Page 87 and 88: Adopted June 22, 2010number and wid
- Page 89 and 90: Adopted June 22, 2010e. Coordinate
- Page 91 and 92: Adopted June 22, 2010STREETSCAPE MA
- Page 93 and 94: Adopted June 22, 2010c. Re-evaluate
- Page 95 and 96: Adopted June 22, 2010streets’ imp
- Page 97 and 98: Adopted June 22, 2010Downtown Carbo
- Page 99 and 100: COUNTRY CLUB RDN. BILLY BRYAN STS.
- Page 101 and 102: 3.3SalukiExpress RoutesTRANSIT ROUT
- Page 103 and 104: Adopted June 22, 20104Housing &Neig
- Page 105 and 106: Adopted June 22, 2010Summary of Hou
- Page 107 and 108: Adopted June 22, 2010the 1970’s.
- Page 109 and 110: Adopted June 22, 2010Figure 4.3 | O
- Page 111 and 112: Adopted June 22, 2010units. This su
- Page 113 and 114: Adopted June 22, 2010poverty, conve
- Page 115 and 116:
Adopted June 22, 2010from increased
- Page 117 and 118:
Adopted June 22, 2010Rationale:In s
- Page 119 and 120:
Adopted June 22, 2010Strategy 2: Ut
- Page 121 and 122:
Adopted June 22, 2010building orien
- Page 123 and 124:
Adopted June 22, 2010Table 4.5Incom
- Page 125 and 126:
Adopted June 22, 2010including publ
- Page 127 and 128:
COUNTRY CLUB RDN. MARION STBig Mudd
- Page 129 and 130:
Big Muddy R.104.03Big Muddy R.Crab
- Page 131 and 132:
COUNTRY CLUB RDN. MARION STMurphysb
- Page 133 and 134:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 135 and 136:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 137 and 138:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 139 and 140:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 141 and 142:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 143 and 144:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 145 and 146:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 147 and 148:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 149 and 150:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 151 and 152:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 153 and 154:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 155 and 156:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 157 and 158:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 159 and 160:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 161 and 162:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 163 and 164:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon
- Page 165 and 166:
Adopted June 22, 2010City of Carbon