October 2011 Bassetlaw District Local Development Framework

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cost factorsDelivery factorsThere are no exceptional cost factors that would be incurred when developing thissite.No negative factors and good access.Achievability conclusionReasonedjustificationThe site IS achievableCurrent demand indicates some interest locally and this regular shaped plot with goodroad access likley to be of interest.Expected start dat Total number of dwellings 86When will the site be delivered? 6-10 yearsComments Based on 90% of the gross area (3.18ha) at a density of 30 dwellings per hectare.Initial assessment DevelopableReasonedjustificationThe site is suitable and could come forward within 5-10 years provided that the site isallocated.Final assessmentcommentsThe site is adjacent to the built form of Walkeringham. The site is considered suitablefor development provided that the highway requirements can be met. The owners ofthe site are promoting the land for development (either in part or in full) and wouldbe willing to provide a detailed proposal for the site if required. However, planningpermission has not been gained and the site is not allocated. If this was to changethen the landowners would sell the land. There is known market demand for suchsites locally.19 October 2011 Page 1280 of 1704
Site number 446 Other site referenceHouse number House name Land south ofStreet name Gringley Road Locality WalkeringhamTown Retford County NottinghamshirePostcode Parish WalkeringhamLocation Edge of settlement Grid reference 476883 392205Site area (ha) 0.98 Brownfield area (ha)Current use (s)Previous use (s)Surrounding landuse(s)Agricultural landNot knownNorth- road and open countrysideEast- residentialSouth- open countrysideWest- open countryside and treesConservationdesignation 1CommentsArchaeologyIDENTIFIED: The land to the east of the site is identified as an area ofarchaeological interest.Conservationdesignation 2CommentsConservationdesignation 3CommentsConservationdesignation 4CommentsPhysical problem 1 AccessCommentsIDENTIFED: Road improvements would be required. As it is a 60mph zone visibilitysprays would be important consideration along with satisfactory details of layoutaccess, parking, turning facilities and servicing. Requires visibility to be provided asstandard, on site highway layout to standard, planning contributions and off siteimprovements.Physical problem 2 Flood riskCommentsCOMMENT: Site is identified as being within flood zone 1. Comments fromEnvironment Agency suggest that current greenfield runoff rate is maintained andSUDs are utilised to manage the surface water on site such as soakaways or rainwaterharvesting etc. Should this form part of a phased development then a holistic19 October 2011 Page 1281 of 1704
Page 1 and 2: Bassetlaw DistrictLocal Development
Page 3 and 4: Site number 280 Other site referenc
Page 5 and 6: ReasonedjustificationMarket demand
Page 7 and 8: Physical problem 3CommentsPhysical
Page 11 and 12: ReasonedjustificationMarket demand
Page 13 and 14: layout access, parking, turning fac
Page 17 and 18: Achievability conclusionReasonedjus
Page 19 and 20: this source should be considered.Ph
Page 47 and 48: ReasonedjustificationCurrent demand
Page 49: Physical problem 3CommentsPhysical
Page 53 and 54: ReasonedjustificationCurrent demand
Page 61 and 62: CommentsPhysical problem 3CommentsP
Page 67 and 68: CommentsPotential impact 1CommentsP
Page 71: ReasonedjustificationCurrent demand

October 2011 Bassetlaw District Local Development Framework

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?